The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
Today in Supreme Court History: October 10, 2012
10/10/2012: Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin I argued.
To get the Volokh Conspiracy Daily e-mail, please sign up here.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Lucy v. Adams, 350 U.S. 1 (decided October 10, 1955): Court reinstates injunction, meaning that University of Alabama can’t deny two black students admission; District Court had found that sole basis for denying entry was skin color; Ms. Lucy had been trying for three years to get in; she was still excluded from dorms and dining halls; riot broke out when she actually showed up and, being pelted with bricks and eggs and death threats, she was suspended for her own safety; University then expelled her for being litigious (!) and she moved out of state, at first staying with Thurgood Marshall’s (her lawyer’s) family in New York; returned to the University and got her degree there in 1992
Montanans for a Balanced Federal Budget Committee v. Harper, 469 U.S. 1301 (decided October 10, 1984): Rehnquist refuses to overrule the Montana Supreme Court which had held that placing a “Balanced Federal Budget” initiative on the ballot violated the state constitution (it would have directed the state legislature to apply to Congress for a convention to consider a balanced budget amendment; one assumes the Montana court believed it would usurp the power of the legislature)
United States ex rel. Skinner & Eddy Corp. v. McCarl, 275 U.S. 1 (decided October 10, 1927): shipping corporation created during World War I isn’t a United States entity (even though created by statute and the U.S. held all its stock) and therefore company about to get sued by it can’t get Comptroller General to rule on setoff; Brandeis, who wrote the opinion, points out that such corporations are an “instrumentality of the Government” but are formed so that they can be free to “employ commercial methods and to conduct their operations with a freedom supposed to be inconsistent with accountability to the Treasury under its established procedure of audit and control over the financial transactions of the United States” (wow that that phrase smell funny)
Your comments are the only reason I bother to open these history posts. You’re a lot better at this than Blackman.
Thanks!
What about October 10, 1973? On that day, the Court was hearing oral argument. Justice Potter Stewart assigned one of his clerks to monitor the NL playoff game between the Reds and the Cubs and pass him an update after each at-bat. NBC interrupted its coverage of the game to announce that vice president Spiro Agnew had resigned after pleading nolo contendere to corruption charges. Stewart’s clerk passed him a note saying, “Cranepool flies to right. Agnew resigns.”
So Cranepool and Agnew were both out.
It was Kranepool, and the Mets not the Cubs, but you’re right.