The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
Today in Supreme Court History: August 9, 1974
8/9/1974: President Richard Nixon resigns from office, President Gerald Ford takes oath of office.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
...and this relates to the SC, how?
President Ford appointed John Paul Steven to the Supreme Court.
That's quite a stretch and he certainly didn't do it on his first day in office.
Either because had the SC supported Nixon's claim of executive privilege, the investigation would have stalled and so he wouldn't have resigned, or because Ford would have been sworn in by CJ Burger.
United States v. FMC Corp., 84 S.Ct. 4 (decided August 9, 1963): Goldberg says he has no jurisdiction to stay a merger which allegedly violated the Clayton Act. Here, the U.S. brought suit in the District Court which denied its motion for a stay. The U.S. appealed to the Circuit Court, which held that it had no jurisdiction. At issue was the "Expediting Act", 15 U.S.C. 29, under which final judgments in antitrust cases brought by the U.S. can only be appealed directly to the Supreme Court. This had been construed to mean that there can be no appeal (to any court) of nonfinal orders in such suits. Goldberg notes that there is a split in the circuits (the Third Circuit disagreeing with everybody else) but he goes along with the majority view. (Of course, as Circuit Justice he didn't have the power to resolve the split; in fact it has never been resolved.) Also at issue was the "all writs" statute, 28 U.S.C. 1651(a), which codifies the common law view that an appellate court has the power to order injunctions (and any other relief) in aid of its appellate jurisdiction. Goldberg held that the Expediting Act, being specific to this situation, was controlling.