The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
Edited Version of NYS Rifle & Pistol v. Bruen for Barnett/Blackman 2022 Supplement
I distilled the 132 decision down to about 40 pages. Dobbs is next.
Rest assured, I will have much more to say about the past twenty-four hours, and Red June more broadly. For now, I would like to share an edited version of NYS Rifle & Pistol v. Bruen, which I prepared for the 2022 Barnett/Blackman supplement. I distilled the 132-page decision down to about 40 pages. It is always a tough judgment call of what to include, and what to omit. Given the gravity of this case, I erred on the side of inclusion. In particular, I focused on the historical materials on which the majority and dissent disagreed. For those sources on which there was no back-and-forth, I excerpted. I could probably teach an entire seminar on this decision, coupled with McDonald and Heller. Much more to come.
Now, onto editing the 213-page Dobbs decision.
Update: Maybe it should be Red Flag June. Between Dobbs and Bruen, hundreds of cases now have red flags next to them.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Spending only 24+ hours with the opinions in Bruen (135 pages), Josh has edited them into a publishable form for his casebook and is prepared to teach an entire seminar course on the decision.
Well, whoever calls FIRST wins. Congrats Josh.
I know, right? It would take most people weeks to highlight some text and push control-x a handful of times.
Seriously: how long SHOULD it take to cut the least-salient bits from the opinion in your view? And why?
Correction: Blackman thinks he could teach a seminar on the subject.
I’m sure he could bloviate, but I think his confidence in teaching anything is misplaced.
Should I bring my glock to a mediation and ask for dismissal of the case? Is that a sensitive area? Would I be able claim mahhhh rightzzz at a disciplinary hearing?
Is there a point to this. A syllabus* is always published with the SCOTUS opinions. If you really want to understand the opinion, you read it in full. So what is the point of a 40 page summary.
______________
* Of course, if you are a total moron, each opinion contains a disclaimer:
"The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321, 337. "
That is probably the most cited SCOTUS decision, since it appears at the heading of EVERY later SCOTUS decision. And on an incredibly stupid point.
This should be a law review t-shirt.
I believe the post says it's for a supplement to a casebook -- presumably this one.
IANAL but I'll "distill" (don't think it's used accurately) it to 2 sentences.
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. (Insert "Common Sense" infringing law/rule/regulation here) is Unconstitutional, NEXT!!!!!!!!!!!!!"
Whew! That's a load off my mind.