The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
Harlan Institute-Ashbrook Virtual Supreme Court Championship Round
The top two teams presented oral argument in NYS Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen at the Georgetown Supreme Court Institute
The topic for the 10th Annual Harlan Institute-Ashbrook Virtual Supreme Court competition was NYS Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen. On April 25, 2022, the top two teams presented argument at the Georgetown Supreme Court Institute. Presiding were Judge Neomi Rao (U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit), Judge Gregory Maggs (U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces), and Judge Stephen S. Schwartz (U.S. Court of Federal Claims).
Representing the Petitioners were Campbell Collins & Gabriella Lovins from Austin, Texas.
Representing the Respondents were Arjun Kishore & Nicole Orlofsky from Greenwich, Connecticut.
After a well-argued match, the Petitioners narrowly prevailed, and Campbell Collins was selected as best oralist. The students are truly phenomenal, and could participate in any law school moot court competition.
Congratulations to all of the the students, coaches, and parents, who participated.
After the argument, we took pictures outside the Supreme Court--thankfully before the barricades went up.
We plan to launch next year's tournament in August. The topic will be the Harvard and UNC affirmative action cases.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Gosh, who is that tall, distinguished-looking man in the middle with the big feet? (signed, by someone who wears size 14 shoes)
One small, irrelevant comment. Everyone looks really stupid and annoying wearing a coat and tie. Those should be prohibited. They make people hate you, and stop listening.
This competition shows that high school students can easily replace Supreme Court appellate lawyers. The $600 an hour fees are a total ripoff.
A three-judge panel featuring three Federalist Society favorites, two Thomas clerks (and one Thomas clerk wannabe), three Trump nominees?
So much for that Heterodox Academy crap this white, male, right-wing blog tries to peddle as part of its "affirmative action for wingnuts" campaign.
Carry on, clingers.
Can I suggest that the official name for the award be changed from "best oralist"? Maybe "Best Argument"?
I'm changing my mind about Josh. He doesn't look like Josh Mostel so much as Penn Jillette.