The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
Slippery Slope Arguments in History: 1823
From Harrington v. Commissioners of Roads of Newberry District. (S.C. Const. Ct. App. 1823), an opinion dealing with whether a court clerk should be seen as explicitly exempted from the then-existing common duty of working on road construction:
If once the door be opened, by construction, for any officer to escape from the duties of the citizen, the lock is not opened, but the key is useless, and the bolt broken; and however narrow the first opening, there will never be wanting hands to push it wide, and those will be the hands of the strong, the sagacious, and the interested.
If the clerk were to be the only officer thus privileged, I should not greatly regard it, but the peculiar reason given for this exemption will not be regarded. The principle received, will, and must be, that an officer understood to be occupied in his official duties becomes exempt, whether it appeared by statute or common law….
[S]omething peculiar may be found in every case, and future judges will look to the principle alone, and lay aside the guards and qualifications. The people will not comprehend such subtleties. The practice of the country will be upon the general principle. Other officers will be excused and considered exempt. Some circuit decisions will be predicated upon the habit of expectations of the country.
Finally, another qualified decision will creep in, and the two will be enough to beget a race of exempts that may put at defiance the principle to which we are allowing only one harmless exemption. But these little exemptions in favor of individual privileges are as contagious as the leprosy….
A principle once surrendered in a particular case is no longer firm, but trembles at every new attack. As then, in treating of great principles, we would willingly say, "esto perpetua [let it be perpetual -EV]:" So in resisting the first encroachments, our rule should be "obsta principiis [resist at the beginning -EV]."
"Stop innovation in its early stage,
For when the upstart thing grows strong from age,
No time, nor strength of tenets stop its rage."
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
NOW I understand why 2022 South Carolina resembles 1823 South Carolina.
Can't have progress because that'll lead to. . . more progress.
S. Carolina is avoiding a slippery slope.
"why 2022 South Carolina resembles 1823 South Carolina"
Tolerant liberalism on display.
Its 25th by state GDP so it seems its economic progress is pretty average.
On the other hand, it got Joe Biden the nomination so you are probably right, it is backwards and ignorant.
See also arguments over the draft in the late 1960s.
Hi, Queenie. Sounds like white enslavement, working on a chain gang. This was an unknown benefit. Sitting is the new smoking.
There's something about that I find appealing. I can think of one guy on the township Board of Supervisors I'd take great pleasure in watching wield a shovel full of cold patch.
Read the Supreme Court case of Butler v. Perry. Said that it didn't violate the 13th amendment for the government to compel private citizens to build roads.
Hi, Queenie. When we meet, let's go for a walk, Honey.