The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
Free PACER! (Or At Least Free PACER Docket Searches)
The judicial conference endorses making PACER searches free for non-commercial users.
The Judicial Conference of the United States has endorsed ending fees for online docket searches through PACER, at least for noncommercial users. Charges may continue for downloading documents, however.
Here is the relevant language from the Judicial Conference's report on the Conference's March proceedings:
The judiciary provides electronic public access to court documents primarily through the Public Access to Court Electronic Records (PACER) service, which, pursuant to Public Law No. 102-140, is funded by electronic public access (EPA) user fees set by the judiciary. Congress does not appropriate funds for the operation of the PACER service. Except in limited circumstances, PACER users are charged a per page fee for searches, with no fee owed unless a PACER account holder accrues charges of more than $30.00 in a quarterly billing cycle (JCUS-SEP 2019, p. 9). The Committee on Court Administration and Case Management considered feedback from the Administrative Office's EPA Working Group on the feasibility of the Committee's proposal to make PACER searches free for non-commercial users. Noting that making searches free would require extensive development work to the current PACER system and all operational versions of the Case Management/Electronic Case Files system (currently 17) and impact several aspects of the EPA program, including fee revenue, program requirements, and system performance, the Working Group recommended that the Committee endorse making searches free for non-commercial users in any future modernized systems. After considering this feedback, the Committee on Court Administration and Case Management recommended that the Conference endorse making all searches free of charge for all non-commercial users of any future new modernized case management, electronic filing, and public access systems implemented by the judiciary. The Conference endorsed the proposal.
This change has been a long time in coming. As Reuters reports, the move comes as Congress is considering even more far-reaching reforms to increase access to federal court filings and materials.
The plan to eliminate some, though not all, of those fees and modernize PACER came as Congress considers whether to pass the Open Courts Act, a bill that would require the judiciary to update PACER and make downloading filings free for the public.
The Senate Judiciary Committee in a bipartisan vote in December advanced the bill to the full Senate for its consideration. The U.S. House of Representatives during the last Congress passed a similar bill in 2020.
The judiciary has raised concerns about the bill's impact on its own efforts to modernize PACER and how eliminating user fees would affect revenue to support it. The judiciary projects it will collect about $142 million in fees this fiscal year.
A cynical read would be that the Judicial Conference is acting so as to forestall more sweeping legislative reforms. Whether this is the cause or not, eliminating fees for PACER docket searches is a positive and long overdue step.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
You wanna know how public servants are conducting the public's business? It's gonna cost ya.
The Conference should request a statute that requires all legal utterances read at the 6th grade or below or be void.
Do you lawyers believe criminal defendants should receive notice? Do you think your worthless, garbage, lawyer gibberish provides adequate, real notice? This is another lawyer delusion you have. Or do you believe the purpose of lawyer language is force people to hire a lawyer to explain it for rent seeking purposes?
When it comes to other technical languages, I do not really care. I want my toilet fixed, my knee pain stopped, to arrive at my destination by plane. I do not care what those people say among themselves. I just want the results. In the case of the law, I have no choice but to get involved. I am owed understandable language as required by the Fifth Amendment.
That would still be beyond your comprehension level.
It's not as bad as reluctant agencies responding to FOIA requests. It used to take a Massachusetts police officer four billable hours to open a filing cabinet and pull out a piece of paper. A few years ago the legislature said the first four hours of search time were free.
I assume now it takes them at least six.
Free searches in a hypothetical unscheduled future version of PACER. I'm going with the "cynical read". I understand the system already has a way to let parties see their cases for free, so charging admission is something that can be turned off.
The New York state filing system allows free access and free downloads of case dockets. (Except certain cases like matrimonial cases, where there is no public access). Just saying.
I’ve seen some extremely local courts give full image access to traffic tickets.
More states are moving to this. In Minnesota, where I am, most substantive filings are now available. I've also had cases in California state court, and most of the substantive filings are available there.
These days, data storage and data transfer are so cheap, and the files are usually sufficiently small, that there's no reason they are not more widely accessible.
Pacer is a decrepit system, designed by idiots, operated by morons. Turn the whole think over to google, amazon, Microsoft, let them run it, sell advertising and make it free for all. Letting 'lawyer's run an information system is silliness. Next lawyers will run the sewer systems too, because brainless morons with law degrees are a threat to humanity ... mostly jewish too.
I use https://www.courtlistener.com/ for my initial searches. Not only is it free, but it works better than PACER. There are some free downloads there. For the items that are not available, the links go directly to the PACER link.
Anybody who is able to do so should download and install the RECAP browser extension.
https://free.law/recap
If you have it installed, whenever you buy a document on PACER and view it, the extension automatically uploads said document to the RECAP archive — which is where Courtlistener gets its documents.
PACER is effectively free as long as you only download less than $20 during a billing cycle. Just FYI for those who only occasionally access the service. You still have to register using a credit card though.
Heard of a truly penny pinching person doing some research that signed up with a prepaid credit card then used the credit card for other stuff. Turns out that when the bill came due the government didn't get their money and didn't know who to charge. I suspect this is a crime and in theory they could track this person down, but in reality it wouldn't be worth the government's hassle to pursue this.
I've long wanted to drop a big V8 mid-engine in a Pacer!
(Talk about a sleeper!)