Today in Supreme Court History: May 21, 2007

5/21/2007: Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly decided.

The Roberts Court (2006)

Comments

[Dan Schiavetta]

Bell Atlantic v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (decided May 21, 2007): mere allegation of parallel conduct insufficient to state an antitrust claim by subscribers against local telephone companies created in the wake of the antitrust breakup of AT&T

Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis: 584 U.S. --- (decided May 21, 2018): Federal Arbitration Act bars Fair Labor Standards Act class actions by employees whose employment contracts have arbitration clauses despite the FAA's exception for federal law violations

May v. New Orleans, 178 U.S. 496 (decided May 21, 1900): when imported bulk goods were opened and sold as separate packages they were no longer "imports" and therefore City's tax assessment was not unconstitutional State-based tariff in violation of Import-Export Clase (art. I, s. 10, cl. 2)

In re Green, 369 U.S. 689 (decided May 21, 1962): picketer arrested for defying anti-picketing state court order should have been allowed a hearing to argue that contempt order was void because picketer's grievance fell within NLRB's exclusive jurisdiction

Wagner Electric Mfg. Co. v. Lyndon, 262 U.S. 226 (decided May 21, 1923): District Court appeal which should have gone directly to the Supreme Court (under 28 U.S.C. 238(a), now repealed) but was appealed to the Circuit Court would be decided directly by the Supreme Court instead of sending it back to the Circuit Court to transfer back to Supreme Court (!)

Baltimore & Ohio Ry. Co. v. ICC, 221 U.S. 612 (decided May 21, 1911): statute setting maximum hours of common carrier employees was properly within Commerce Clause (even though business was mostly intrastate) and Interstate Commerce Commission was properly empowered by Congress to enforce it; requirement that carriers supply monthly reports of excess hours did not violate Fifth Amendment because privilege against self-incrimination is enjoyed by individuals, not corporations

Barnicki v. Vopper, 532 U.S. 514 (decided May 21, 2001): First Amendment protected broadcast of surreptitiously recorded cell phone call between teacher's union officials during collective bargaining negotations (distinguishing Pamela Anderson/Tommy Lee sex tape case (Michaels v. Internet Entertainment Group, 5 F. Supp. 2d 823 (C.D. Cal. 1998)) which involved matter of private concern)

Chaffin v. Stynchombe, 412 U.S. 17 (decided May 21, 1973): higher sentence imposed by jury on retrial is not "Double Jeopardy" because jury not informed of first conviction and sentence not due to vindictiveness (charge was robbery, sentenced to 15 years, lawyer thought he was doing client a favor by getting conviction thrown out due to incorrect jury instruction; retrial sentence was life imprisonment -- d'oh!!)

[DaivdBehar]

Anti trust is based on lawyer feelings. It should not even exist. Technology is a category killer. It is divorced from reality.