The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
Servant of the People
Volodymyr Zelensky's TV series makes for interesting viewing.
Netflix is now streaming two seasons of "Servant of the People," the 2015-2018 Ukrainian comedy series created and produced by (and starring) Volodymyr Zelensky as Vasily Goloborodko, a high-school history teacher who is catapulted to the presidency of Ukraine after his profane rant against government corruption and incompetence is filmed by one of his students and goes viral on social media. This is the show, as everyone knows by now, that catapulted Zelensky himself to the presidency of Ukraine in real life.
It's worth watching. It is much funnier that I expected - Zelensky is a very talented comic actor. And the "production values" are much higher than I expected, too; I think that I was, rather stupidly, expecting it to look like one of those films from Eastern Europe in the 60s - all grainy black-and-white, badly lit, dull and depressing backdrops, etc. - but in fact it looks a lot more like "Friends" or "Parks and Recreation." Very professionally put together, well-directed, well-acted, nicely-paced.
The current events in Ukraine, needless to say, add a terribly somber subtext to what was originally a very light-hearted show. It gives the show a very strange emotional resonance, unlike anything I've ever experienced before. A number of episodes take place out of doors, as "President Goloborodko" travels from one part of Kyiv to another, and the scenes of life on the streets of Kyiv are simultaneously lovely - it looks to me like all of the filming was done in springtime, and the city is gloriously awash in flowers and flowering trees - and heart-breaking, given the recent images showing the savagery that the Russians have unleashed in and around the city.
It's a better show, by a good margin, than its US counterpart, "Celebrity Apprentice: The White House Years." To be sure, "CA:TWHY" was, at times, pretty hilarious; who can forget the episode where "President Trump" is tearing up all of the classified documents on his desk, and his aides are crawling around on the floor collecting the fragments so that they could tape the documents back together? Or the one with the Sharpie? Or the "Drink Your Bleach!" episode. Or the one where head consigliere "Rudy Guliani" holds his press conference in the driveway of the Four Seasons Landscaping Company (mistaking it for the Four Seasons hotel in downtown Philadelphia), to unveil their crack legal team's bombshell evidence of election fraud?
It gave new meaning to the phrase "You couldn't make this up."
But overall, the guy who played "President Trump" didn't have Zelensky's gift for comedy. There was too much anger behind his humor, too much snarl behind the smile, for my taste.
And, like so many shows, CA:TWHY got progressively more outlandish and less believable - more desperate to hang onto those eyeballs - as it went into season four and beyond. The whole premise of Season Five - that "President Trump" would foment the storming of the Capitol to overturn the results of the 2020 election and pay no price, political or otherwise, for having done so, but would instead emerge from the debacle as the titular head of the once-respectable Republican Party - was just too absurd to be credible. And satire, to be any good, has to have some foundation of credibility.
And if you've seen any of the more recent episodes from Season 6 - and ratings are way down, so you probably missed them - you know exactly what I'm talking about. Could anyone possibly believe that "Ex-President Trump" would, in a rare one-on-one interview in the midst of a brutal attack on Ukraine and its people, call on the Russian President - with whom he has had fairly cordial relations - not to cease fire, or to allow for more humanitarian corridors, or to stop murdering civilians, but to send him some dirt on Hunter Biden?! I mean, really. It calls to mind Tom Lehrer's memorable comment that "political satire became obsolete the moment Henry Kissinger won the Nobel Prize."
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Why is Putin still alive? From a utilitarian viewpoint, this is ridiculous. The life of a lawyer dipshit vs $trillion in breakage, and the deaths of tens of thousands of people on both sides. Not much of a calculation is needed.
Ouch. Just ouch.
Donald Trump is just being Donald Trump. With his version of insanity; I don't expect anything more. But the fact that countless "real" Republican politicians have been, are being, and will be, perfectly willing to completely whore their integrity . . . that's been a surprise to me. It hasn't forced me to resign from my Republican party. But it's been a huge embarrassment. And if the 2024 elections are at all close, I shudder to think at what we'll be doing, at the state level, to try and steal victories.
It is really like watching a horrific car crash at super-slow speed.
"...at the state level..."
Should have been, "...at the state and national level..."
LMAO
btw, Tom Lehrer is timeless. I almost shed a tear when I discovered my teenage daughter had Poisoning Pigeons in the Park on her playlist. I had not heard it since college.
Universal bereavement, an inspiring achievement!
My favorite of his is the old Clementine song, which he thumps through in various styles -- Mozart, Gilbert & Sullivan, bebop -- just tosses them off like it's second nature.
Does Donald Trump sublet the space you let him have rent-free in your head? Or is it just vacant?
If better (modern, educated, reasoning, elite) Americans can't scorn and mock people like Donald Trump and his delusional, downscale followers, what would be the point of keeping the bigoted, lying, half-educated hayseeds around?
you tell me "Rev", why haven't you killed yourself yet?
In the mind of liberals, Trump is still in the White House, he became dictator of the United States, the secret service is going to evict him, and our democracy is on the brink....
Wow, seems Post misses Trump even more than people who voted for him.
Indeed
You guys should probably cover your eyes and ears -- and drone something like na-na-na-na-na-na -- when that Piers Morgan interview of Trump is released in full.
Wow, halfway through I thought that Mr. Post had, for the first time in a long while, made a sane post. But no, apparently his dementia continues unabated.
TDS is kind of like BSE; Once you get it, fast or slow, it always progresses.
I know leftists find "Trump humor" irresistible and funny, but in reality it is mean spirited, offensive, and highly distorted. What makes things humorous or funny is when the jokes have some kind of grounding in some kind of real basis, not just made up BS that the liberal media invented to tarnish the character of a great American.
Here it just sounds awkward and "trying" almost like the author was concerned the left was going to take away his party card....
made up BS that the liberal media invented to tarnish the character of a great American.
Nope, JtD. Not made up BS. OK, the bleach drinking is off - he suggested injections, and maybe swallowing light bulbs or something - but the rest is pretty much accurate.
Great American? You are deranged.
The only deranged people are those who are continuing to deny they were pumped and dumped by the media, used as rubes and useful idiots, and not even given enough cash to grab a city bus home.
Do you repeat every breathless, improbable headline you read? Not even Politifact will go with you on that one.
These people lie so much they can't even keep the lies straight anymore....
What's worse, he was referencing treatments that had been in the news the week prior (actual experimental treatments that were done pre-antibiotics and had been done on multiple-resistant bacteria), with peroxides not bleach (he never actually said the word bleach, just cleaner)
He also dismissed the approach in the same paragraph, saying "it would do a number on your lungs" and continued on. It was a throwaway comment from start to finish and no one would have cared or done anything about it if the media didn't try to use it as an attack.
Actually, I remember at the time research that involved purging lungs for transplant of a virus by UV irradiation. And respiratory infections in the sinus can frequently be cured by a sinus rinse with a mild bleach solution.
While I agree that Presidents shouldn't blue sky in public, nothing he was talking about was particularly stupid if you follow the medical literature. And don't start from the assumption that everything he says has to be stupid.
Sigh....
Post goes off on another Trump rant.
Here's the sad truth. Trump understood Putin. And in doing so, he was able to effectively prevent the massive Russian invasion of Ukraine. Using the concept of strategic ambiguity (and by threatening to bomb Moscow), Putin delayed his full invasion for the entire Trump presidency. Trump also firmly discouraged the NordStream 2 pipeline, while encouraging US energy production, and demanding our allies spend more in defense against...exactly this risk. He ran a program of lethal military aid to Ukraine, that the Obama-Biden administration didn't want, while providing much of the critical training that Ukrainian forces are relying upon today.
Biden was the best thing that ever happened to Putin. Biden cut US energy production, while encouraging the NordStream2 pipeline. He said basically straight out "the US won't defend Ukraine"...ending any strategic ambuguity. Even today, Biden is limiting arms transfers...more than Congress (on both sides of the aisle!) want.
https://rollcall.com/2022/03/16/bidens-sending-arms-to-ukraine-but-some-in-congress-call-it-lacking/
Trump understands that him just publicly calling on Putin to "pull out of Ukraine" wouldn't accomplish a damn thing. Trump has no political power over foreign affairs right now, Trump knows it, Putin knows it, and ultimately such a statement would likely be counterproductive. But Putin is quite happy with the Biden presidency. It's everything he could've wished for.
What flavor Kool-Aid did you drink.
Putin knew that if Trump were re-elected Ukraine would fall in his lap. He would only have to ask Trump for it. Once trump lost that wasn't going to happen.
Trump understood Putin. And in doing so, he was able to effectively prevent the massive Russian invasion of Ukraine. Using the concept of strategic ambiguity (and by threatening to bomb Moscow), Putin delayed his full invasion for the entire Trump presidency.
What a fantasy Trump you have built up.
Come back to the light Bernard. It is 2022. You can drop the whole Trump thing. No one is doing it anymore and even fewer people believe in that shit anymore....
The entire Republican Party is still doing the "Trump thing," in all of its delusional, bigoted, vainglorius, downscale, stupid, un-American glory.
It is funny you are still stuck in mass psychosis land. OK it isn't actually that funny. We have a guy who is president that clearly is losing it on a daily basis yet you are concerned about what Trump said even though he hasn't been in the White House now for 1.5 years. So who is crazy again?
You're the one who hypothesizes that Prob would behave under Trump II than under Trump I, without any explanation of what would change.
Trump isn't the one who tried to sneak a message to the Russians that he would have more flexibility after getting reelected.
Bernard,
Your logic leaves something to be desired.
"Putin knew that if Trump were re-elected Ukraine would fall in his lap. He would only have to ask Trump for it."
If....hypothetically...that were in any way true. Why on earth would Putin wait? Why not "ask Trump for it" (assuming that somehow Trump could "give" Putin Ukraine) when Trump was already in office?
I know you have severe TDS, but seriously. Look at the facts.
Funny how no one mentions that Biden seemed to be in bed with Ukraine corruption prior to 2020 as well. Or at least Hunter was reaping the benefit of that.
Because you never interrupt your enemy when he's destroying himself.
"Because you never interrupt your enemy when he's destroying himself."
Care to elaborate on that a little more?
Among Putin's greatest aspirations are to undermine America's democratic norms and institutions and destroy NATO. Trump was doing that for him.
Subjugating Ukraine could wait.
Yup. I have no reason to doubt Bolton's claim that Trump wanted to pull the US out of NATO in a second term.
Whether Putin genuinely has kompromat on Trump, I know not, but Trump's behaviour before and since was not inconsistent with the hypothesis that he had.
"Whether Putin genuinely has kompromat on Trump, I know not, but Trump's behavior before and since was not inconsistent with the hypothesis that he had."
Yeah, absent a second term it's basically falsifiable; No reason to doubt Bolton's claim, but likewise, no reason to believe it, either.
Unless TDS counts as a reason. Which for a lot of people it does.
Or was the "We'll pull out of NATO" discussion merely a threat to get other countries to pull their weight?
An alliance means nothing when it's entirely one-sided
Wow, you are delusional.
It takes a very special level of chutzpah to give credit to Trump for the program he opposed and tried to thwart — it shouldn't be hard to remember this; he was impeached for it! — just because Congress successfully enacted it over his efforts.
"just because Congress successfully enacted it over his efforts."
So, you've got a record of Trump vetoing such a bill? No?
I don't understand why someone like you would proudly, loudly, and boldly display that they are an ignorant tool.
None of your 'analysis' of Trump v. Biden v. Putin is accurate.
Trump was destroying our alliances. Trump was weakening NATO as a result. Why would Putin bother upsetting that apple cart when he was getting exactly what he wanted?
Now that Putin's invaded, what has happened to NATO? What has happened to the "West" as a whole? We've united. Something Trump could never dream of accomplishing.
You are a fucking imbecile.
Oh, yeah, weakening NATO by demanding that the other members actually live up to their treaty commitments.
Except that's not what Trump did, is it? He didn't use diplomacy, he ranted about how NATO was a bad deal for America, and did what he could to undermine *our* commitments.
Pretending what Trump did was actually some 4D chess move to strengthen NATO Is ridiculous. He hated the thing.
It was actually just 2D checkers: He told the other members of NATO that they had to either live up to their end of the bargain, or we were pulling out, right?
If all he'd wanted to do was pull out, why give them the option of actually complying with their treaty obligations?
Yep
Once more: you've been told that there are no such "treaty commitments." Trump just made that up as an excuse to argue that the U.S. should pull out of NATO.
(Every president for decades has argued that our fellow NATO members should invest more in defense; none of them argued that this was a reason for the U.S. to quit NATO.)
Yes, yes, the NATO 2% expenditure commitment agreement was not, technically, a treaty.
Right, the treaty involves agreeing to contribute, the exact number wasn't in the treaty itself, but had been agreed to, and was being violated.
I don't think that's going to be an issue going forward, for at least a couple years anyway.
No, still wrong. The 2% thing — which was not an "agreement," and thus could not be 'violated" — was not a "contribution." It was a (nonbinding) commitment to spend more on their own militaries. Trump maliciously or ignorantly (or, as usual in his case, both) kept trying to portray that as a contribution to NATO.
More to the point David, NATO article 3 reads as follows.
"In order more effectively to achieve the objectives of this Treaty, the Parties, separately and jointly, by means of continuous and effective self-help and mutual aid, will maintain and develop their individual and collective capacity to resist armed attack"
Now, if a NATO country "did not maintain" its capability to resist armed attack, it would be...problematic...in terms of its treaty committments.
This has often been interpreted as the "2% of GDP" spending rule, by multiple conferences between NATO members...a level that allows for NATO members to be able to maintain its capability to collectively resist armed attack.
But to put some of these numbers in context, German defense spending used to be 4-5% of GDP in the 1960's. Today, it's just above 1% of GDP, while the German Army is training with painted broomsticks instead of machine guns. When Germans were called on to support their Article 5 commitment in Afghanistan...the results weren't pretty. They were basically incapable without outside armed forces providing support.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/german-soldiers-in-afghanistan-cant-shoot
In order to field CAPABLE armed forces, it is necessary to adequately support them. And from the real world reports...the German army was not capable. They did not maintain their readiness and capability to effectively fight. It required more funding and training than the Germans were providing...they spent the money elsewhere. And relied upon the US to support their defense needs, if anything happened.
That's not collective defense. That's basically just relying on someone else to do all the real work and funding.
Funding NATO
"Indirect funding of NATO
"The 2% defense investment guideline
In 2006, NATO Defence Ministers agreed to commit a minimum of 2% of their Gross Domestic Product (GDP) to defence spending to continue to ensure the Alliance’s military readiness. This guideline also serves as an indicator of a country’s political will to contribute to NATO’s common defence efforts since the defence capacity of each member has an impact on the overall perception of the Alliance’s credibility as a politico-military organisation."
Also, no previous president told Trump's oft-repeated lie that NATO member defense spending shortfalls were a dollar for dollar debt those countries owed to the United States.
So, in other words, Trump was "weakening" NATO by preventing Russia from invading Ukraine.
Sure...go with that.
Reminiscent of the classic "review" of the History Channel's programs about WWII - can't find original but below is text from another website - https://stevewolfgang.wordpress.com/tag/world-war-ii/
the worst offender here is the History Channel and all their programs on the so-called ‘World War II.’ Let’s start with the bad guys. Battalions of stormtroopers dressed in all black, check. Secret police, check. Determination to brutally kill everyone who doesn’t look like them, check. Leader with a tiny villain mustache and a tendency to go into apopleptic rage when he doesn’t get his way, check. All this from a country that was ordinary, believable, and dare I say it sometimes even sympathetic in previous seasons.
I wouldn’t even mind the lack of originality if they weren’t so heavy-handed about it. Apparently we’re supposed to believe that in the middle of the war the Germans attacked their allies the Russians, starting an unwinnable conflict on two fronts, just to show how sneaky and untrustworthy they could be? And that they diverted all their resources to use in making ever bigger and scarier death camps, even in the middle of a huge war? Real people just aren’t that evil. And that’s not even counting the part where as soon as the plot requires it, they instantly forget about all the racism nonsense and become best buddies with the definitely non-Aryan Japanese.
Not that the good guys are much better…. It’s pretty standard “shining amazing good guys who can do no wrong” versus “evil legions of darkness bent on torture and genocide” stuff, totally ignoring the nuances and realities of politics. The actual strategy of the war is barely any better…. one example: in the Battle of the Bulge, a vastly larger force of Germans surround a small Allied battalion and demand they surrender or be killed. The Allied general sends back a single-word reply: “Nuts!”. The Germans attack, and, miraculously, the tiny Allied force holds them off long enough for reinforcements to arrive and turn the tide of battle. Whoever wrote this episode obviously had never been within a thousand miles of an actual military.
Probably the worst part was the ending. The British/German story arc gets boring, so they tie it up quickly, have the villain kill himself (on Walpurgisnacht of all days, not exactly subtle) and then totally switch gears to a battle between the Americans and the Japanese in the Pacific. Pretty much the same dichotomy – the Japanese kill, torture, perform medical experiments on prisoners, … and the Americans are led by a kindly old man in a wheelchair.
Anyway, they spend the whole season building up how the Japanese home islands are a fortress, and the Japanese will never surrender, and there’s no way to take the Japanese home islands because they’re invincible…and then they realize they totally can’t have the Americans take the Japanese home islands so they have no way to wrap up the season.
So they invent a completely implausible superweapon that they’ve never mentioned until now. Apparently the Americans got some scientists together to invent it, only we never heard anything about it because it was “classified.” In two years, the scientists manage to invent a weapon a thousand times more powerful than anything anyone’s ever seen before. Then they use the superweapon, blow up several Japanese cities easily, and the Japanese surrender. Convenient, isn’t it?
…and then, in the entire rest of the show, over five or six different big wars, they never use the superweapon again. Seriously. They have this whole thing about a war in Vietnam that lasts decades and kills tens of thousands of people, and they never wonder if maybe they should consider using the unstoppable mystical superweapon that they won the last war with. At this point, you’re starting to wonder if any of the show’s writers have even watched the episodes the other writers made.
I’m not even going to get into the whole subplot about breaking a secret code (cleverly named “Enigma”, because the writers couldn’t spend more than two seconds thinking up a name for an enigmatic code), the giant superintelligent computer called Colossus (despite this being years before the transistor was even invented), the Soviet strongman whose name means “Man of Steel” in Russian (seriously, between calling the strongman “Man of Steel” and the Frenchman “de Gaulle”, whoever came up with the names for this thing ought to be shot).
So yeah. Stay away from the History Channel. Unlike most of the other networks, they don’t even try to make their stuff believable.
I don't know. I much preferred the plot of "World War II" to its prequal "World War 1". Sure, World War II had fantastic elements, but it was action-packed at least.
"World War 1" (or its original title "The war to end all wars"), it was just so boring. It started out OK, but then it just became a duller version of Squid Game, where it was the same game every time. "Let's go all charge the machine gun nest from this trench line". There were seriously like six episodes of that in a row. That was only broken up by a little bit of low-budget air warfare. And seriously, naming the bad guy the "Red Baron" after the Snoopy comic? Couldn't they do anything better?
There was that one potentially good naval episode "Jutland" but then...it was just so unfurfilling. You finally had this massive naval clash of massive battleship fleets coming together, and in the end...not a single one of these massive floating fortresses was sunk. Not one, out of more than 40 on both sides, just some little ships. And the results of this potential clash...both fleets just stayed home the rest of the series.
No, World War II was much better than its prequal, in every way,
I am reminded of the last chapter of Norman Spinrad's "Iron Dream". The conceit of the novel is that after his time in prison following the Beer Hall Putsch, Hitler becomes a pulp fiction novelist and eventually writers a book called "Lord of the Swastika" - which contains much Nazi imagery.
The last chapter is a critical review of the novel, pouring scorn on the idea that all this imagery, propaganda, etc. would actually be effective in the real world.
Post is trying to compare a comedy to a farce.
If you chose 109 people throughout the world at random you'd have a better track record than the Nobel Peace Prize Committee at choosing non-warmongers.
Nothing Trump did was as Stupid as Sleepy Joe's "Tuskegee Airmen" remark.
You remember, when he attributed Afro-Amuricans reluctance to take shots recommended by Honkey Doctors on the "Tuskegee Airmen" (pretty sure he through in a "Folks" and a "Man!") when he really meant the "Tuskegee Experiment".
But Hey, Sleepy's ended Covid, finally overturning the Mask Mandate for Air Travel!
After he fell down the stairs of Airforce One a few times and then tried to shake the hand with a ghost apparently. Yet no one in the media seems concerned that he is not mentally fit to continue to hold office.....Wonder why.....?
You must have forgotten about the Revolutionary Army occupying the airfields.
That doesn't even resemble what happened. Like most normal people, Trump tore up pieces of paper after he was finished with them (classified documents could simply be re-printed). But the National Archives people say they must preserve any piece of paper the president touches. So they collected them and taped them, which they didn't have to do.
Trump never told anyone to drink bleach. In the episode I assume you are referring to, he never even used the word "drink" or the word "bleach". So you were accurate - except for the part where every word was made up.
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2020/jul/11/joe-biden/no-trump-didnt-tell-americans-infected-coronavirus/
I assume you missed the sequel where the feds charged 12 people with sedition and conspiracy - almost as if they planned the riot, instead of it being spontaneously fomented by President Trump.
The sad bit is that if Mr. Post had managed to retain a firm grip on reality over the last few years, the second half of his post could have easily been some really trenchant and sardonic commentary on how media coverage of Trump resembled a scripted TV series because so much of the coverage was over-the-top fiction.
David Post takes the "Rent Free" meme to a whole new level.
Now that how you TDS. Kudos.
Whatever happened to statesmen? Zelensky has a Netflix appearance with "his profane rant against government corruption and incompetence", and yet it continued in the Ukraine, with the Biden Family now loosing their chance at becoming Ukrainian oil and gas lease billionaires. Zelensky - globalist puppet, actor, dancer, comedian (similar to globalist drama-major Trudeau) - with some of his broadcasts from stage sets in a Polish-American embassy, and with offshore accounts that will keep him comfortable in later life. He's against Putin, a ruthless former KGB nationalist. Kissinger once said that Ukraine is Russia. Putin told President Bush that Ukraine is not a country. Would things have been different if we had a true statesman as U.S. President (is there a statesman left in the federal government?). As it is, a U.S. client state is becoming a Russian client state. Ukraine should have tried to remain a neutral state. The world will probably never totally be Marxist, Globalist, or Nationalist. Politicians may make out well in the end, but the people suffer and are told lies.
Setting aside the rest of Vlad Jr's ignorance and stupidity here, what the hell does this mean?
“This is the show, as everyone knows by now, that catapulted Zelensky himself to the presidency of Ukraine in real life.”
News flash: it was Kolomoisky, Zelensky’s boss, the gangster who runs Ukraine and the the Azov, who put Zelensky, the puppet, where he is as an actor pretending to be president. In case folks here haven’t noticed, gangster-Oligarchs like Kolomoisky are adept at moving money to corrupt American politicians like the Bidens.
Please, no more of this Russia/Ukraine nonsense without putting the gangsters and their role in context (including the role of the state dept as gangster groomers).
News flash: it was Ukrainian voters who put Zelensky where he is, Mr. Putintroll.