The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
Harlan Institute-Ashbrook Virtual Supreme Court Semifinalists
25 Teams of HS Students presented oral argument in NYS Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen
The topic for the 10th Annual Harlan Institute-Ashbrook Virtual Supreme Court competition is NYS Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen. This past weekend, twenty-five teams of high school students presented oral arguments in the semifinal round. The teams were superb. Truly, these high school students could compete in any law school moot court competition. The Round of 8 will be held in two weeks.
Semifinal Match #1
Semifinal Match #2
Team #8715 v. Team #8977
Semifinal Match #3
Team #8853 v. Team #8870
Semifinal Match #4
Team #8748 v. Team #8889
Semifinal Match #5
Semifinal Match #6
Semifinal Match #7
Semifinal Match #8
Semifinal Match #9
Semifinal Match #10
Semifinal Match #11
Semifinal Match #12
Semifinal Match #13
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
These young people make my point, adult at 14. With a little effort and support, they write excellent briefs, and argue well. Get rid of high school and college.
So, you OK giving 14 year olds voting rights?
Driving?
Purchase weapons?
Be tried as adults?
Age of consent?
Just wondering where you draw the line.
No lines. Full adult privileges and responsibilities. They are totally superior to current adults, not just in their legs and dancing. They are totally superior in their brain functions, and are hobbled by babysitting services of high school, and of college. Go to the occupational training in 9th grade.
As to maturity, it comes from experience and from suffering. That is being artificially delayed. It is done by the lawyer profession keeping out top competitors to protect their clients from competition.
Plato would disagree.
Plato did not have to adjust the scoring of 40 year old people downward by 50% to get the average at IQ = 100. The average 40 year old qualifies for Special Ed in high school, and scores in the retarded range compared to age 16.
Yes indeed. Those students did very well.