The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
Why Does the Supreme Court Refer to Preferences for Hispanics/Latinos as "Racial Preferences"?
Officially, Hispanics are an ethnicity that can be of any race, not a racial minority. I clear up the mystery in this blog post.
As discussed in my forthcoming book, Classified, when the Office of Management and Budget created the official Statistical Directive 15 "Hispanic" (later changed to Hispanic or Latino) category in 1977, it dictated that Hispanic was an ethnic classification, not a racial one. Despite occasional efforts to change the category to a racial one, most recently with the blessing of the Obama administration, it has remained an ethnic category ever since. This surprised me, because not only are Hispanics often colloquially often referred to a racial minority, but the Supreme Court has consistently referred to preferences for Hispanics in higher education as "racial preferences."
In the course of my research, I cleared up the mystery. When the Statistical Directive 15 categories went into effect, most government agencies that collected racial and ethnic statistics responded by placing a two-part race/ethnicity question on demographic forms. These forms asked individuals if they were Hispanic and, separately, what race they saw themselves as belonging to (White, Black, Native American, or Asian American).
The Department of Education, however, demurred. Its Office of Civil Rights left it up to the schools and universities gathering statistics about their applicants and student bodies to decide whether to use a two-part question or a one-part question. A one-part question asks individuals whether they are Black, White, Hispanic, Native American, or Asian.
Universities overwhelmingly chose the one-question route. This made Hispanic status the equivalent of a racial status—for example, one could not be both Hispanic and White on these universities' admissions forms.
The Department of Education did not change its rules to require a two-question ethnicity classification until 2007, about a decade after OMB told the Department it had to do so. By then, the notion that Hispanic affirmative action preferences in university admissions amounted to a "racial" preference was entrenched. But for whatever it's worth, as far as the U.S. government is concerned, preferences for African Americans, Native Americans, and Hawaiians and Pacific Islanders are "racial" preferences, while preferences for Hispanics are "ethnic" preferences, and Hispanics can be of any race. [About fifty percent of Hispanic check the White box on forms, most of the rest identify themselves as "other"].
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I'm not sure there's as much of a distinction between race and ethnicity as many people thing, after all, one of the definition or race is "a group of tribes or peoples forming an ethnic lineage".
That said, "Hispanic" is barely an ethnicity.
The difference is, legally speaking, that one can be a "White Hispanic" or a "Black Hispanic" but one can't be a "White Asian" or a "Native American African American" or an "Black Pacific Islander," though as of the late 1990s one can check off more than one "racial box." In which case the government then assigns you a single race for statistical purposes, so that, e.g., someone who checks off "White" and "Black" is classified statistically as Black.
There are no white people in Asia? I find this claim doubtful.
Especially in the Caucasus region. -- Duh!
Not to mention all those Indo-European derivatives.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-European_studies
More than a few slaves found freedom among the Nations
I decided last year that when asked, my race is 'Sephardic'.
I have heard that identifying one's race as 'human' is racist.
What about Terran or Earthling?
"Race" seems to be nothing more than variations in genetic markers among discrete populations. So, my race is lactose tolerant.
"Son of Adam" may be my go to.
David,
A genuinely fascinating post. Thanks...I learned something new today.
Right? This is the most interesting and useful thing DB has written on this site.
I would say that the general public probably doesn't have a decent understanding of the differences between race and ethnicity. SCOTUS Justices should know better, but as we've seen with Sotomayor, common or even educated sense isn't really a given.