The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
California Stops Requiring Academic Prerequisites for Horseshoeing Schools
The change stems from a First Amendment case brought by the Institute for Justice, a leading libertarian public interest law firm.
From an Institute for Justice press release:
After more than four years of litigation, Bob Smith and Pacific Coast Horseshoeing School (PCHS) are free to return to teaching horseshoeing to students who have not completed high school or an equivalent government-mandated exam….
"Horseshoeing has nothing to do with calculus, writing or social studies[," Bob said. "]Horses don't do math, and horses don't read books. If you can shoe a horse, you can shoe a horse." …
No state in the country prevents people from actually shoeing a horse, but California prevented Bob from teaching horseshoeing to certain students. Under California's so-called "ability-to-benefit" law, schools like Bob's couldn't accept students who lacked a high-school degree or a GED (or who had passed a government-approved examination).
Both teaching and learning are protected by the First Amendment. That doesn't change just because someone pays to learn or gets paid to teach. If Bob were to write a book or record a YouTube video on horseshoeing, the State of California couldn't punish him. Teaching a group of tuition-paying students is no different. To protect his First Amendment rights, as well as the rights of his students, Bob and PCHS partnered with IJ and challenged the law….
In June 2020, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that California's law burdened the First Amendment rights of both Bob and his students. Following that decision, the case was sent back to the federal trial court in Sacramento, where the state would have been required to prove that its law could survive First Amendment scrutiny.
Then, in September 2021, the California Assembly passed a bill that repealed the "ability-to-benefit" requirement. That change will go into effect on Jan. 1. Going forward, schools like Bob's can admit students regardless of their level of education or their score on a state exam.
For more on the Ninth Circuit decision, see here; I had filed an amicus brief in support of the School on behalf of Profs. Jane Bambauer, David Bernstein, Clay Calvert, and Mark Lemley, Dean Rodney Smolla, and myself.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I applaud (and financially support) IJ's efforts; my only objection to them is how small so many of their victories are.
Can you ask them to start linking to the underlying court documents in their press releases?
Click on the link on the left sidebar of the press release (which is of course linked above by Professor Volokh) entitled "California Trade Schools" under the heading "Related Case."
Scroll down, and you'll see links to many court documents, including (in this instance): the Complaint, the Motion to Dismiss, the Opposition and Reply, the Order, the Appellants' Brief, the opposition and reply.
This one isn't very small, it's evidentiary not just about horse shoeing, it also slows barber, beauty and nails schools to teach people, which was a major roadblock for people learning a trade.
I don't understand the "ability-to-benefit".
Paternalism: We don’t want you to be able to take advantage of stupid people.
With the assumption that if you don’t have a state certificate, your too stupid to decide to pay for training. (Questions about how sumb you can be and still get the cert is left to a different discussion.)
Many trade schools are pure scams, taking money from anyone with a pulse while providing little or no benefit to the students. One way states have tried to regulate away that problem is to require that those schools only enroll people who (the state thinks) have a hope of getting something out of it.
Someone who doesn't successfully complete the trade school is effectively just throwing money away. So they don't want those schools to enroll people who aren't likely to complete it. One screen that California chose was graduating from high school.
But… horseshoeing isn't something that it takes a whole lot of academic ability or accomplishment to master. So even granted the consumer protection aspect of the regulation, it makes little sense here.
Yeah, you don't need a high school education to shoe horses, but you know what else you shouldn't need a high school diploma for?
Driving a truck driver, being barber, or a hairdresser, or a manicurist, etc. All of which requires training, and a license, and requires a diploma or a GED for no good reason.
Unless those were independent requirements for the required license then it shouldn't make any difference. On the other hand not all of those occupations should High School diploma.
I'm not defending the licensing schemes in those professions either, but what makes this regulation particularly irrational is that there is no licensing scheme. Anyone can be a horseshoer. You don't need a diploma, GED, or license. And yet the state still didn't want people without diplomas to learn horseshoeing.
Next you will claim that baby-sitters ("free" child care workers) don't need college degrees, and could be paid less than "real" teachers.
Without government regulations and wage requirements, how can we know how to live our lives?
This new rule sounds much .... ferrier.
*bah dum tss*
Crickets
Naaaay.
But I assume if it were a federal law it would be constitutional because teaching horseshoeing affects interstate commerce.
I took the test and almost met the threshold. But they told me that "almost" counts in horseshoes.
"Horses don't do math"
au contraire:
https://youtu.be/hAJlAuEo7Ac
The fact that California stops requiring all academic prerequisites for horseshoeing high schools is not a good idea. Because the fundamental education should be general and be transportable, I provide educational assistance online, students can get help with transformation properties from my equations at https://plainmath.net/secondary/geometry/high-school-geometry/transformation-properties, and I always face the case when specific formal math question, in other words, problem, seems to be not will be used anywhere is a critical point of view to general problem-solving skills. Also, you will not expect those horseshoeing students to have their jobs forever, so that they will need proper academic fundamentals for other jobs.