The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
Get Back!
Thoughts on the new Beatles documentary
If you have not yet seen the recently-released Beatles documentary streaming (exclusively, I believe) on Disney+, let me highly recommend it to you. It is a truly remarkable video document.
You probably have heard, in the barrage of publicity, the story of how the film came to be. In Jan. 1969 the band had decided that they wanted to do a live show, with new songs. It would be their first live show in 3 years (which seemed, at the time, like a very long absence); after having spent most of 1963-66 on the road, playing to prodigiously large and increasingly hysterical crowds, often in massive outdoor stadiums (unheard of before the Beatles came along), they disappeared into the studio. Over the next three years, they created a series of masterpieces which changed popular music forever: Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band, Magical Mystery Tour, and The Beatles (the "White Album") - an explosion of musical creativity with very few parallels in the history of music, popular or classical.
They gave themselves 3 weeks to work up a new set of songs (which ultimately culminated in the fabulous "rooftop concert" at Apple Records and the final two studio albums, Abbey Road and Let it Be). The entire 3-week process was filmed by filmmaker Michael Lindsay-Hogg, resulting in several hundred hours of video, and director Peter Jackson has put together 9 hours showing them working on the new stuff - basically writing most of it on the fly, rehearsing different versions, etc., along with a lot of just goofing around, and arguing with each other about the music, and many other things.
I had anticipated that the music, and the musicianship, would be terrific, and it is. They remain, in my ears at least, the best band of all time.
I was unprepared, though, for how moving - even heart-breaking - I found it. To begin with, there is the whole backstory that many of us already carry around in our heads. Personally speaking, I grew up with the Beatles; they were a large and constant presence in my life (and in the lives of pretty much everyone I knew) from junior high school (the Ed Sullivan Show performance) to my junior year in college (the release of Let It Be), and it is difficult for me to think of any people (other than people with whom I had actual face-to-face contact) who were more important to me in those years than The Beatles. They created much of the soundtrack for the whole period during which I was growing up, and the illusion of being a fly-on-the-wall with them for three weeks is pretty powerful.
Added to which there's this terribly melancholy feel to it all, given that we all know (though of course they don't) that they'd never play together again as a band, that things would turn nasty and they wouldn't even be on speaking terms with each other in a few years, and that John would be murdered in another 10 years or so (as it happens, on this date 40 years ago).
But nostalgia aside, I can't think of anything I've ever seen or read that conveys the process of collective artistic creation like this film does. The way they would take little snippets of things - stuff that didn't really sound terribly good at the start - and play around with them, discarding some and turning some - many - into little rock-and-roll masterpieces (Get Back, The Long and Winding Road, Two of Us, Don't Let Me Down, Let it Be… ) is pretty breath-taking. A surprising amount of stuff on the film actually sounds pretty lame, as they try out harmonies that don't work, lyrics that don't work, keyboard parts that don't work, dopey rhymes, rhythms that sound stupid, etc. But then they finally really nail it, and it's like the gates of heaven open up.
I can't recommend it highly enough. It is DEFINITELY worth the $7.99 for a one-month Disney+ subscription. Whether you have 9+ hours to spare to dig into it is another question, but if you've got any Beatles in your blood you should check it out - you'll enjoy it.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"even heart-breaking"
It was a pop band. 4 multi-millionaires.
I wonder why it's so hard for some people here to seemingly enjoy ANYTHING
So many of the commentariat (plus a couple conspirators) remind me of Hunter Thompson's line about Nixon: "I couldn't imagine him laughing at anything except maybe a paraplegic who wanted to vote Democratic but couldn't quite reach the lever on the voting machine."
God, Thompson was a great writer!
Bob's just an ass generally.
Sometimes music is just music.
Why do you hate money and profit and earnings? That;s lefty talk.
That is correct. a pop band, and 4 multi-millionaires. Your point being ...???
Its not "heart-breaking" at all.
Pop bands break up every day. OMG THE BEATLES like a school girl is sad, not "heart-breaking".
9 hours watching a pop band singing and talking in a studio is also just sad.
You're a fool, Bob. "Pop bands break up every day." True! If you think the Beatles are just another pop band ... well, you're a dope.
You should open yourself up a little bit to the world - I know you love snark, but really, it doesn't become you.
Eight hours a day -- every day -- of proofreading $17,000 residential deeds in Lower Jesusland, Ohio for typographical errors is not quite so sad, though?
I never had to deal with that level of desolation, but it sounds like enough to make anyone a basket case.
Sadly, it's on Disney+. I wont subscribe to watch it.
Thanks for letting us know!
and who gives a fuck?
$7.95 can be a bit stiff for some people.
Or even a free trial.
ok, boomer
Funny, I tend to be equally, if not moreso, dismissive of anyone under the age of about 40.
So you're cool with a lot of millennials then.
OK, Wigger
I Got Blist-uhs on mah Fing-Uhs!!!!!(Distorted Power Chord)
Even that nut-job Charlie Manson loved the Beat-les, any haters really do suck.
First, thank you for the post, Post. I love the Beatles, my teenage sons have an encyclopedic knowledge of all things Beatles (and Dylan)—far surpassing me. I forget how stupid the comments section is; please ignore the haters.
Second, I assume you didn’t mean to imply that Let it Be was their final album. I judge harshly those who don’t (rightly) list Abbey Road as the final album, lol. Abbey Road is the greatest album ever released in music history IMO, and it’s B-side was the PERFECT ending to the band. I still get a bit emotional when they go from Golden Slumbers to Carry That Weight (with the You Never Give Me Your Money reprise) to The End. The greatest band ends its career with the greatest album, ending with the greatest B Side, itself ending in a song titled The End (I don’t count Her Majesty). It was the perfect ending.
I have long considered myself fortunate that the three bands I liked most -- Stones, Who, Springsteen and E Street -- have survived and thrived for so long. I have seen each relatively recently and expect to see each next year. That's after more than four decades of following them to every corner of the country.
Had I chosen the Beatles, the Doors, and Led Zeppelin, or Creedence Clearwater, Pink Floyd, and Emerson, Lake, and Palmer, I would have been stranded 30 or 40 years ago. I liked the Beatles, Creedence, Pink Floyd, and ELP -- and dozens of others -- but lucked into focusing on bands that endured. Even some of the less prominent bands I particularly liked -- Southside Johnny, Doobies, Tubes -- have stuck around. Sometimes luck counts a great deal.
I think that’s where our entertainment preferences differ. For many of my favorite bands and artists, I prefer listening to the studio albums at home with a good pair of over-the-ear headphones and a good drink, in my trusty recliner, as opposed to attending a concert. (Now I’ve never gotten into Springsteen, and if I did I’d imagine he would be an exception, since I’ve read many times how legendary his and his band’s shows are.) Maybe that’s because I’m not into much newer or even semi-recent music/artists, and it kind of depresses me to see artists I love performing well past their prime and butchering their tracks or having to rely on backup singers to hit any notes higher than Middle C. (If the older artists could/would lean into their age like Johnny Cash did on Hurt, etc., that would interest me, as it’s almost like a new or reimagined artist.)
I do like concerts though, but more of my and my wife’s guilty pleasure, which is seeing local tribute bands in fairly small venues. I love those shows, and I won’t apologize for it, lol. The nostalgia factor for us and all of our fellow Gen X-ers packed into a small concert space (500 people, standing room only) listening to The Smiths, The Cure, or Depeche Mode tribute bands is dialed up to 11.
You can listen to concerts at home by getting into a band like the Grateful Dead (inarguably the greatest American band).
Whereas I don't think there is a huge benefit to listening to a Rolling Stones (or the Beatles, or any other brand not incorporating improvisation) show at home.
Let It Be is the best ending for the band because it's just them, doing their thing, together, just like it was at the beginning. Abbey Road, and the others, are great. But it wasn't the boys working together like they did on Let It Be.
I disagree, with respect. Let it Be was the Get Back sessions, with the music then famously (infamously?) overproduced/ruined by Spector IMO (Let it Be Naked is far superior and improved). Abbey Road was the band’s “one last rodeo,” with a commitment (demanded by the Fifth Beatle, the genius producer George Martin) to do it right. And get it right they did. Very fitting that the recording of The End was the final time they recorded together as a band.
I've read that the last time they played in the studio together was actually I Want You. I don't disagree that Abbey Road is a better album and that the naked version of Let It Be is way better w/o Spector. All that being said, watching Get Back makes it feel like those sessions were a bit of a coda for the boys.
Fair enough. My teenage sons and I are waiting till my other son returns home from college for Winter Break in a week or so to watch the Get Back documentary on Disney+. So maybe I’ll feel differently then. We are all very excited to watch it together. We’ll probably need to agree that each of us can complain about Yoko Ono sitting there only 5 times each episode, lol.
It's a blast, I'm sure you'll enjoy it greatly. I watched it with some bandmates and it was deeply relevant to all of us.
Well, regarding the chronology, it is true that Abbey Road was the last album they worked on, though Let it Be was the last one in terms of the release date; I guess Phil Spector needed lots of additional time to ruin most of the cuts on the latter. 🙁 [As someone mentioned, the "Let It Be - Naked" release, without all that Spector junk, was a real revelation]. But you're absolutely right that in terms of the arc of the Beatles' outpouring of music, Side 2 of Abbey Road - which I distinctly recall listening to in total amazement - makes for the absolutely perfect ending.
"Whether you have 9+ hours to spare to dig into it is another question, but if you've got any Beatles in your blood you should check it out - you'll enjoy it."
- Relax. Don't do it.
[Frankie]
David leave out (IMO) the most important reason for the group's fans to watch this: All of us who have seen "Let It Be" came away with one view of the breakup. A bunch of unhappy blokes who spent their time bickering and sullenly snarking through much of the movie.
I came away from "Get Back" with an *entirely* different sense of all four of them, of Yoko's relationship to John and her (lack of?) role in the group dissolving. Fascinating, to me. If you're not a fan of this group, then by all means skip it. But that's true about pretty much any documentary, right?
I will happily still blame John and Yoko, even if she’s not the sole reason. It was creepy and inappropriate for her to literally be in their faces day after day, eating Melba toast and balancing her checkbook, or whatever she did. Get a hint! Lol. I can’t even imagine how annoying the others found it to be (even if they’re too nice or diplomatic to say so).
I’ve read that John, in an interview given in 1980 (I think), said he thought Paul intentionally looked at Yoko every time he sang “get back to where you once belonged” during the recordings of Get Back. Whether Paul did or didn’t (hard to tell I’m sure, since she literally insisted on sitting directly in front of them the entire time!), it tells me that John was aware that they were imposing. (Of course, John being a jerk—a totally genius jerk, admittedly—I’m sure that was a feature not a bug of her presence.)
Right - and quite apart from who's to blame the breakup of the band, the original Let It Be film made it look like they all pretty much hated what they were doing, and each other. Get Back gives a very different picture of all that - there was a helluva lot of real love in that room, and it's delightful to see.
It really drives home the fact that the maker of the documentary is telling a specific story through inclusion and editing choices, and that story isn't necessarily a complete or even a true version of events.
Thank you for the review.
Most of the songs that were the product on this on-camera “collaberation” were . . . not good. And the Beatles were perfectly aware of it. Which is why they abandoned the project and left it to others to cobble an album out of it.
You are certainly entitled to your opinion that songs like "Let It Be" aren't good. But they worked on a lot of songs on-camera that found their way onto Abbey Road (Octopus's Garden, Bathroom Window, Something, I Want You). They worked on at least two songs that were released as singles (Old Brown Shoe, Don't Let Me Down), and even a few songs that would eventually turn up on various solo projects (All Things Must Pass, Gimme Some Truth, one of Paul's which I can't remember now). So many songs here were not "abandoned." I don't think I agree that's why they abandoned the Let It Be album anyway. And a pox on the horrible Phil Spector for what he did to that album, as well as ruining Harrison's All Things Must Pass.
I'm not a Peter Jackson fan, but he did an incredible job here. Watching these songs come together (no pun intended) was fascinating, and then hear them really come to life as soon as Billy Preston sat down at the keyboard. Also as you said, many of the little snippets Jackson left in were heartbreaking, like John talking about Allen Klein, the man who probably had more to do with breaking up the Beatles than Yoko ever did. And listen to Glyn Johns try to gently talk John out of using Klein. Both the Beatles and Stones would soon learn the truth about Klein.
It also drove home the fact that Paul was absolutely on fire writing songs during this period. At one point he basically says "Oh I've also written this" and begins playing "Let It Be." Incredible. Plus he'd just written "Come And Get It" and given it to Badfinger.
The only thing I could've done with a little less was all the footage of them singing songs in "funny" voices. But a small quibble with an absolutely great documentary.
"hear them really come to life as soon as Billy Preston sat down at the keyboard:
Preston was a total revelation for me in this film. John and Paul were both really good at the keyboard - Paul could even be brilliant at it, on some of the slower ballads (Let It Be and Long and Winding Road) - there's that wonderful moment when the band's on break and Paul is noodling around with what will ultimately become "Let It Be," and Ringo, who's been standing there listening, turns to whoever was next to him and says "Man, I could listen to him play piano all day." But they had worked for a long time on the song "Get Back," with sometimes John and sometimes Paul on keyboard, and they couldn't get it - until Preston comes along. And I love that moment, just after they've done a really terrific take, where John looks at Preston and says: "I want you in the band." Whew. And he had only dropped by to say hello!
Preston was a brilliant musician, who led an incredibly sad life. You would never know it from the footage here, he always had a huge smile on his face. Why wouldn't he, he was playing with the freakin' Beatles!
"The only thing I could've done with a little less was all the footage of them singing songs in "funny" voices. But a small quibble with an absolutely great documentary."
This is one of my favorite parts, actually. If you've ever been in a band, this is what you do. One of the most humanizing things I've seen about the boys that otherwise have a god-like mystique to them. They are just four blokes having a good time at band practice!
Yes, that's true. I enjoyed a little bit of it, but Jackson included a lot. He agrees with you.
Also great to hear George bring out "Old Brown Shoe" and everyone starts working on it. And Ringo has a bit of "Octopus's Garden," and it's George of all people who comes over and starts helping with it! Tons and tons of little snippets that make this worthwhile. Jackson is obviously a very knowledgeable fan.