The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
Today in Supreme Court History: September 17, 1787
9/17/1787: The Constitution is signed.

Happy Constitution Day!
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
It contained some mistakes. It did not end slavery, causing the Civil War. It had a life term at the Supreme Court, resulting in sclerotic, and stupid series of decisions. It ensconced patent terms which crushed innovation.
And to this day, the Constitution can be viewed under glass during normal visiting hours in the imperial capital.
Liberals should think more about how this, admittedly imperfect, document was a big step in the right direction.
Conservatives should think more about how this document failed and/or just left out so many people.
"Conservatives should think more about how this document failed and/or just left out so many people."
They think about it plenty . . . it generates most of the applause lines at meetings of the Federalist Society, the Council For National Policy, the Heritage Foundation, the Klan, the American Legislative Exchange Council, and the various Family groups.
OK, but what was the practical alternative?
I presume you're not in the group which says the U. S. should have stuck with the Articles of Confederation (those people tend to be hardcore libertarians), which in any event wouldn't have solved the problem of leaving people out.