Dean Joseph Kearney & Prof. Thomas Merrill Guest-Blogging About "Lakefront: Public Trust and Private Rights in Chicago"

|

I'm delighted to report that Dean Joseph Kearney (Marquette) & Prof. Thomas Merrill (Columbia) will be guest-blogging this week about their new book, Lakefront: Public Trust and Private Rights in Chicago, which has just been released by Cornell University Press:

How did Chicago, a city known for commerce, come to have such a splendid public waterfront―its most treasured asset? Lakefront reveals a story of social, political, and legal conflict in which private and public rights have clashed repeatedly over time, only to produce, as a kind of miracle, a generally happy ending.

Joseph D. Kearney and Thomas W. Merrill study the lakefront's evolution from the middle of the nineteenth century to the twenty-first. Their findings have significance for understanding not only Chicago's history but also the law's part in determining the future of significant urban resources such as waterfronts.

The Chicago lakefront is where the American public trust doctrine, holding certain public resources off limits to private development, was born. This book describes the circumstances that gave rise to the doctrine and its fluctuating importance over time, and reveals how it was resurrected in the later twentieth century to become the primary principle for mediating clashes between public and private lakefront rights. Lakefront compares the effectiveness of the public trust idea to other property doctrines, and assesses the role of the law as compared to more institutional developments, such as the emergence of sanitary commissions and park districts, in securing the protection of the lakefront for public uses.

By charting its history, Kearney and Merrill demonstrate that the lakefront's current status is in part a product of individuals and events unique to Chicago. But technological changes, and a transformation in social values in favor of recreational and preservationist uses, also have been critical. Throughout, the law, while also in a state of continual change, has played at least a supporting role.

And here are some jacket blurbs:

"In this remarkable book, Kearney and Merrill describe how Chicago came to have one of the world's most glorious urban waterfronts. They masterfully weave together this surprisingly contingent story, relating two centuries of on-the-ground events, influential personalities, and fluctuating legal developments that together created the city's justly celebrated lakefront." —Carol M. Rose, University of Arizona and Yale Law School, author of Property and Persuasion

"A magnificent and exquisitely told story, replete with scoundrels and corrupt politicians, Lakefront solves the longstanding puzzle of the origins of the Supreme Court's famous nineteenth-century ruling in Illinois Central Railroad Co. v. Illinois and reveals its no less extraordinary epilogue, including the ruling's unlikely resurrection by 1970's activists to become powerful legal precedent for environmental protection." —Richard J. Lazarus, Aibel Professor of Law, Harvard University, author of The Making of Environmental Law

"Grant Park and the Chicago lakefront are among the nation's great public spaces. This stimulating book uncovers the troubled historical, legal, and social roots of these parklands. Consistently painstaking, judicious, and readable, Kearney and Merrill are role models for work in urban history." —Robert C. Ellickson, Walter E. Meyer Professor of Property and Urban Law, Yale University, author of Order Without Law

"Thanks to its authors' exhaustive research, clear prose, colorful cast of characters, exceptionally helpful maps, and enviable ability to illuminate for all complex concepts of private and public property, Lakefront is a wonderful read for not only those interested in Chicago but anyone who wishes to understand how urban built environments come into being and continuously evolve." —Carl Smith, Northwestern University, author of City Water, City Life and Chicago's Great Fire

"Lakefront is an excellent book that adds much to our understanding of development along Lake Michigan within the City of Chicago." —Ann Durkin Keating, North Central College, author of The World of Juliette Kinzie

"A fascinating, beautifully crafted historical account of one of America's greatest waterfront cities and the legal doctrines that shaped its development by preserving its greatest natural asset. A must read for all interested in urban history, property law, and the preservation of public spaces." —Nicole Stelle Garnett, University of Notre Dame, author of Ordering the City

"The making of Chicago's extraordinary landscape along Lake Michigan required law, lots and lots of law. That is the core insight that shapes Kearney and Merrill's Lakefront. This is a transformative study, rooted in imaginative research into arcane case files and innumerable government records, as well as illuminating mapmaking. It will be essential reading for urban historians, for students of the planning process, as well as for legal historians and for property lawyers. For those most interested in property law, Kearney and Merrill challenge sentimental understandings of the power of public trust doctrine and argue for the significance of possession and vested rights in shaping development. For city planners and others, they make a strong case, though one that will inevitably provoke controversy, that contingency and unintended consequences were more important than aesthetic vision in producing the wonder and the beauty that we admire as Chicago's lakefront." —Hendrik Hartog, Class of 1921 Bicentennial Professor in the History of American Law and Liberty, Emeritus, author of Public Property and Private Power

"The authors build their fascinating story case by case easily accessible to the lay reader. We learn how, legally or not, agencies, urban planners, individual personalities, the courts, and one railroad shaped today's uniquely beautiful Chicago lakefront." —Libby Hill, author of The Chicago River

"Lakefront provides a detailed history of the making of the Chicago lakefront. Each chapter recounts an episode of local legal history, with the authors briefly and skillfully explaining legal concepts where necessary. This is a thoroughly researched, well organized, and extremely well written book." —Stuart Banner, UCLA School of Law, author of Speculation

I very much look forward to their posts!

NEXT: Today in Supreme Court History: June 14, 1810

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. I wonder if Ilya will weigh in on the takings involved. Could be interesting.

  2. Does it go into the death of Meigs Field? Sometimes “The making of Chicago’s extraordinary landscape along Lake Michigan required” crimes, lots of crimes.

  3. Really, I think this falls under, “Authoritarian regimes can accomplish big things. While forgetting to manufacture toilet paper.”

    I’ll grant that the area of Chicago’s waterfront near the Museum of Science and Industry is quite nice. Pity Chicago is has such a high crime rate… They might be better off with an uglier waterfront and a government that’s less corrupt and cares more about public safety.

    1. Chicago used to be safe as long as you stayed north of the ballpark.

      Has this changed?

      1. Good question. I know the South side can be pretty scary, I got forced into an exit ramp once by a truck and had to drive through it via the surface streets, instead of taking 90. Reminded me of some of the nastier parts of Detroit.

        The dividing line seems to be I-55. North of there isn’t too bad. Of course, a lot of the lakefront we’re talking about IS is South Chicago, but it may be that, like Greektown in Detroit, (Man, I could go for some moussaka!) you’re OK so long as you stick to the patrolled areas, and don’t walk a hundred feet in the wrong direction.

  4. This is wonderful antiquarian detail, but all this “proves” is that one can “deconstruct” any Supreme Court decision and “prove” that it reflects, not the will of the Founders, but the will of the “deciders”, the justices of the majority, their particular values and interests. “Originalism” has a curious way of refuting itself.

    One can also point out that future Courts always have the option of expanding or shrinking the application of any previous decision. to the extent of simply overturning or abandoning it. And thus the Constitution gets continuously rewritten, often unconsciously.

  5. This is the New York Central in 1905: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JD5z0pN58_M

    It would be a whole lot easier to do this if you were running across a lake (note the third rail to guide the scoop) and you need fairly clean water (distilled is ideal) to make steam as everything else is left behind as crud in the boiler.

    Lake Michigan water is nice — I’ve drank some — and as it was/is Chicago’s water source, the railroad was already using it to fill its trains. So why not grab it offshore?

    There’s a public interest in fast trains that don’t have to stop to take on water, and if the RR could argue that the ability to go offshore and draft water expedited train travel throughout the Midwest, would the court have ruled differently?

  6. Welcome Dean Kearney! Fantastic for this former student to see you on Volokh. And with Tom Merrill! I don’t suppose the Melms mansion is going to work its way into this series.

Please to post comments