The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
Today in Supreme Court History: January 9, 1919
1/9/1919: Schenck v. United States argued.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Yes you are right this was an amazing to watch discussion Cafe Racer Jacket amazing biker jackets on sale
"The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theatre and causing a panic."
Ollie Holmes, master of the pithy straw-man.
The “straw man” became real on Wednesday. Do you read this blog?
Someone published an anti-draft leaflet on Wednesday?
I don't know . . . but a Republican member of Congress (Miller of backwater Illinois) said on Tuesday that 'Hitler was right about one thing' (the importance of persuading a nation's youth to great applause at a rally of conservative women.
I'm starting to think Republicans and conservatives are going to go down without much of a fight.
You don't have the right to say "march on the Capitol! Fight!" when you're speaking to a large, well-armed mob. You are liable for the resulting stampede and any predictable injury.
Mr. Schenck published a leaflet against the military draft. He neither shouted "fire" in a crowded theater nor urged a mob to march on the Capitol.
I don't even know if Mr. Schenck was related to Donald Trump.
You need to remember that was back when movie film was made of explosive nitrocellulose (aka guncotton) and I'm told that it would even burn underwater.
Theaters were made of wood, with no sprinklers, and the firefighting equipment of the day was primitive at best. Horse-drawn steam powered pumpers -- you had to start a fire and build up steam before they would work.
Fire was much more of a concern then than now -- and a shouted warning was the only fire alarm in most cases. No fancy flashing strobe lights and klaxons.
Yes, free speech doesn't protect *that,* and if the case were about *that,* Holmes' remark would have had some relevance.
I believe his line was "shout 'fire' in a crowded theater" but I may be mistaken....
There can do what they want, I'm just concerned about my online business. Well said, I aptly agree with all your points. Have you visited second.com.ng- a blog that curates the latest Jobs in Nigeria such as the https://www.second.com.ng/frsc-recruitment/ and https://www.second.com.ng/frsc-shortlisted-candidates/