The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
Any Tips for Video Parties?
Any suggestions for how best to do a video party (not just a small-group video conversation)? Since it's hard to have good video conversations with more than 6 people at once (or maybe even more than 4), the party would at least need a breakout room feature, where people can choose to join one group and then move on to others.
I was thinking of doing it by Zoom, setting the option letting people join the breakout room they choose. But are there other platforms that are better? I noticed Evite has configured one; do any of you have experience with it? Are there other tips beyond just what platform and configuration to choose? Let us all know!
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
If it's a party with your fellow conservatives, Zoom will censor everything you and others have to say, because big tech is working with Hugo Chavez. You should probably stick to Parler.
What kind of party is this?
Maybe a plaintiff, maybe a defendant.
Any thoughts on what's the chance that Zoom will find adequate nationwide bandwidth during prime party times this Christmas season?
Professor Volokh...Look into MSFT Teams. We use it extensively where I work. It is a worldwide outfit, so I interact with colleagues in South America, Europe and Asia regularly.
I did a larger-ish group zoom thing early in the pandemic. (Maybe about 16 people?) We didn't do breakout rooms, it was still fun. I'm not sure breakout rooms are going to be a good approximation for the conversational groups that naturally occur at parties. Entering and leaving them is so abrupt. I am not sure think any platforms are going to be able to replicate this well.
Tip: Don't invite Jeff Toobin.
Somebody had to do it.
Why? Who knows what kinds of Zoom parties Eugene throws? Maybe all sorts of weird Caligula shit goes on there. My advice: if the invitation says, "Come as you are.", I'd be careful to see which spelling he used for the first word.
Shorter Tip: Don't.
Thanks -- why not? Are there particular reasons these events are unlikely to be enjoyable? I've had some very nice Zoom drinks with a four to six friends; is there a reason this wouldn't scale, even with breakout rooms?
I've used Skype and MS Teams for work. I've tried Zoom once or twice. Zoom sucks.
Mozilla Hubs is a service designed for this. It's a virtual space, with the volume of others modified according to their distance from you.
So you can wander off with a small group to chat semi-privately, or hang out with a larger group to listen to a speaker, all in the same space.
gather.town is another, similar service you could compare for your needs.
Sharper: Thanks for the suggestion! But am I right that you'd be visible in Mozilla Hubs as a cartoon avatar, rather than as your real-life video image?
Play games! Stuff that dictates who acts/talks when to cut down on cross-talk.
Not sure how much you've been following it, but given your earlier research into VR, this might be of interest: https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2020/12/vr-meetings-are-weird-but-they-beat-our-current-reality/
Of course it's of limited value to groups in which everyone doesn't have a VR setup (i.e. just about all of them).