The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
Tip for Law Students (and Young Lawyers) on Formatting Decisions
"Plagiarize! Only be sure always to call it please 'research.'"
A student asked me how to structure the Table of Authorities in a brief that we'll be filing in a particular state court—whether the Table of Authorities should have all the cases together in one Cases section (which many courts require) or have in-state cases in a separate section from out-of-state cases (which some courts call for), perhaps further broken down by court.
The commonly (and correctly) recommended answers to such questions, of course, are:
- Check the rules.
- Ask local counsel.
- Call the clerk of court's office.
But sometimes the rules don't give the answer, and you don't want to take up local counsel's time (or the time of the clerk's office) with the question. So there's another option:
- Figure out what the top firms are in the state, and then search in Westlaw (or Lexis or Bloomberg) for briefs filed in the relevant court by those firms.
Here, it turns out that they put the cases together in one section, so that's how we'll be doing it. There is safety in numbers.
Naturally, this might not be the optimal solution if it costs money to do the Westlaw search, but law students have free Westlaw access, and many firms have a flat-rate plan. Just remember what your mother asked you when you wanted to do what your junior high school classmates did: "If everyone was going to jump off the bridge, would you do that, too?" When it comes to legal formatting conventions, the answer is, "Yes."
It's similar to what H.W. Fowler wrote about pronunciation:
The ambition to do better than our neighbours is in many departments of life a virtue; in pronunciation it is a vice; there the only right ambition is to do as our neighbours.
Of course, as Fowler notes, the one needs to consider who counts as "our neighbours" for this purpose, which is why I recommend following the top firms. Or, elaborating on the response to your mother, "Yes, if all the cool kids are doing it."
(The subtitle, of course, is from the great Tom Lehrer; but remember, you borrow from your friend in Minsk only if you're filing in Belarus courts.)
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
If you want to look like you're doing a good job, imitate the "top" firms. Actually doing a good job is another matter.
Actually, Lehrer's victim is in Dnepropetrovsk.
True, but he has a friend in Minsk, who has a friend in Pinsk...
Victim, shmictim. Lehrer's fictional Lobachevsky (let's not blame the real Lobachevsky for this) got it from the Minsk guy, whoever the Minsk guy got it from. Likewise, if you copy a formatting approach from, say, a Mayer Brown brief or a Gibson Dunn & Crutcher brief, you're likely copying from someone who copied from someone who copied from ....
I disagree.
As the lyric makes clear, the guy in Minsk was just the first link in a conspiratorial chain which delivered the goods to the singer (not the fictional Lobachevsky, but his student).
No Anglo-American lawyer has done original work since 1066.
I've had to tell new lawyers that plagiarism is for law school. As practicing lawyers, we copy a LOT. There's no need to reinvent the wheel on a basic motion or a standard of review.
"Law is the only discipline in which the phrase 'That's an original idea' is a pejorative."
Creative accounting is also considered bad ...
My experience has been that judges don't care HOW you format cites, only that you are actually making citations and being accurate about them.
It's funny, because of the transition.
For UG and law school, you are told, repeatedly and often, NEVER PLAGIARIZE. Do not even come close to that boundary. Ever. In fact, in law school you are often reminded that plagiarism is one of those things that can keep you from ever becoming an attorney (character & fitness).
But if you're a practicing attorney, all you do is plagiarize. You plagiarize yourself. You plagiarize other attorneys at your firm. You plagiarize other attorneys at other firms.
The only sin you can have is to waste your client's money by drafting something from scratch. When you get wet-behind-the-ears associates, this is something you have to drum into them. "NEVER, EVER, EVER start writing from scratch- this firm has a document management system, so learn to use it. I guarantee that someone else has written a motion for extension for time." Heh.
Of attorney "errors" and "typos" I would estimate that at least 70% come from copying from a prior filing and forgetting to change something.
I felt like half of my 1L career was spent changing "Guarantor" to "Guarantors" and "is" to "are." Pro tip: Avoid saying "Guarantors"; use "each Guarantor" instead.
It is kinda gratifying to see your own original drafting get adopted in other people's forms though. Even more gratifying is when a judge cuts and pastes chunks of your brief into their opinion.
"Even more gratifying is when a judge cuts and pastes chunks of your brief into their opinion."
You know my favorite thing? Those judges (usually only state court and some older federal judges) that have you "submit" the opinion.
That's right, lay people. That opinion that was written by the judge? Nope. It was written by one of the attorneys in the case.
I didn't know that, but I'm not at all surprised given that lobbyists and not legislators write most of the laws.
.
Well, it's a little more respectable than having the lobbyists write the law!
It's more common in state courts, but often you will have a hearing, and the judge will ask the winning party to write the order reflecting what the judge ruled.
More rare (and usually on complex issues) are when the judge asks both parties to submit lengthy proposed orders.
You don't have software that can format documents?
I used to let the software format the TOA but I gave up. Too many minor mistakes, and in the time it took me to detect and fix them, I could have generated the TOA myself. It's easy with Ctrl+F and Shift+Ctrl+F. Also the briefs I write have as few citations as necessary.
1. I generally use Word's Table of Authorities feature, in which I mark each citation, and then use Insert Table of Authorities to generate the table based on those markings. I am told some software automatically generates the tables well from the document, but I haven't experimented with it enough.
2. In any event, though, one needs to tell the software (whether Word or some other program) what format it should use for the Table of Authorities, given that different courts expect different ones.
The business version of this principle used to be "nobody ever got fired for buying IBM".
One of the partners when I was a young associate was fond of saying: "Original drafting [in the M&A context] is malpractice per se."
On this particular topic ...
"COMES NOW ...."
Ugh.
It beats " 'Sup "
I'd have more respect for a 'sup.
Besides, I have a life-long dream to submit a brief written entirely in emoji.
How about an all-emoji hospital admissions system:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LXzJR7K0wK0
And "Comes Now" has nothing on "WITNESSETH" with spaces between each letter, and the letters (but not the spaces) underlined. Try typing that out freehand rather than just Cut & Pasting it from another deal. In witness whereof, I have hereunder affixed my signature and seal.
Here's a better idea: Find out how the state Attorney General or Solicitor General does it. In most states, they handle well over 50 percent of the state Supreme Court's docket, and they generally have a good working relationship with the state Supreme Court. Because of their volume of cases, they set the practice standard. If you do what they do, you'll look like you belong more so than copying an infrequent appellate practitioner from a big firm. I say this having worked in both a state Attorney General's office and a big firm. On appellate practice matters, go with the state Attorney General's office.