The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
Fun Facts About Judge David C. Westenhaver of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio (1865-1928)
The Wilson appointee presided over the sedition trial of Eugene Debs and declared unconstitutional the Village of Euclid's zoning code
Most District Court judges can spend their entire careers without the Supreme Court reviewing one of their decisions. Very few have two of their decisions reviewed by the Supreme Court. And outside of D.D.C., a very, very small number of federal judges preside over two cases that give rise to two landmark decisions. Judge David C. Westenhaver of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio (1865-1928) fits in this august group.
President Wilson nominated Westenhaver to the District Court in 1917. That seat opened up when Wilson nominated Judge John H. Clarke to the Supreme Court in 1916. (Wilson had appointed Clarke to the District Court only two years earlier.).
In 1918, Judge Westenhaver presided over the sedition trial of Eugene Debs. The prominent socialist had given an anti-war speech in nearby Canton, Ohio. Debs was convicted, and Westenhaver sentenced him to ten years in prison. On appeal the Supreme Court affirmed the conviction 9-0.
Seven years later, in 1926, Judge Westenhaver presided over Ambler Realty Co. v. Village of Euclid, Ohio. He declared the Village's zoning law unconstitutional. (You would think that a nominee of such a Progressive president would rule uphold this attempt at central planning.) Judge Westenhaver quipped in his opinion, "This case is obviously destined to go higher." He was right. On appeal, the Supreme Court reversed the District Court's decision by a 6-3 vote. Justice Sutherland wrote the majority opinion. He left his fellow three horseman in the dust.
In the span of seven years, a single District Court judge in Ohio was randomly assigned two cases that would become landmark decisions. One was affirmed unanimously. The other was reversed by a 6-3 vote.
Judge Westenhaver died two years later in 1928.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
What's so landmark about either of them? The Debs case is presumably no longer good law, thanks to our original understanding of the first amendment. And zoning is inherently too boring to be landmark. (Not to mention that the Supreme Court was obviously right, notwithstanding various VC bloggers' and commenters' enthusiasm for extending the takings clause to any regulation they don't like.)
Village of Euclid v. Ambler is actually considered a pretty important case in property law.
"And zoning is inherently too boring to be landmark."
It completely cleared the way for zoning to spread in the US. More significant than 2/3 of so called landmark cases.
If you’re a district court judge frustrated by anonymity, issue bad decisions. You’ll get appealed more often and if you’re really lucky Supreme Court justices will see your name often enough to invite you into their country clubs.
“You would think that a nominee of such a Progressive president would rule uphold this attempt at central planning.” Perhaps there are more things in heaven and earth than are dreamt of in your philosophy, eh, Josh? The majority opinion for Village of Euclid was written by George Sunderland, nominated by that flaming liberal Warren G. Harding, joined by fellow Harding nominees Pierce Butler and Edward Sanford (“Incorporation Sanford”, I guess Professor Blackman would call him), along with Cal Coolidge pal Harlan Stone, William Howard Taft, and Satan himself, Oliver Wendell Holmes.
Well, I screwed it up a little. Subtract Butler and add Brandeis to the majority.
You also screwed up by forgetting your sense of humor.
Wow, someone got up on the wrong side of the bed this morning! Turn that frown upside down, partner!
How about Kenesaw Mountain Landis as a judge with multiple landmark cases:
1. Federal Baseball League
2. Victor Berger
3. Standard Oil
Plus he became Commissioner of Baseball. Pretty good for a District Judge in Chicago!
"Very few have two reviewed"? Is this really so? In a sample of one for district court judges reviewed by SCOTUS that constitutes Justice Breyer's brother, Charles Breyer, it appears SCOTUS has reviewed half a dozen or so of his cases:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Breyer#Personal_life
And the number of Judge Breyer's cases heard by SCOTUS might well be higher if Justice Breyer weren't there, because of his absence at the cert stage probably reducing the number of cases in which cert is granted.