The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
The Environmental Protection Agency Is Turning 50
A symposium looking back at the agency's history, and forward to its future.
On July 9, 1970, President Richard Nixon informed Congress of his plan to create a new federal agency tasked with protecting the nation's people and resources from pollution and environmental harm. Although there were a range of environmental programs and offices throughout the federal government, Nixon argued that a reorganization of federal efforts, concentrating them in a single agency, was necessary to "effectively ensure the protection, development and enhancement of the total environment itself."
The new Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) opened its doors on December 2. The first EPA Administrator, William Ruckelshaus, immediately adopted an aggressive enforcement agenda, and the new agency quickly made its presence felt. For the next fifty years, the EPA would be one of the most powerful and controversial federal regulatory agencies.
Last fall, the Coleman P. Burke Center for Environmental Law at the Case Western Reserve University School of Law hosted a day-long conference on the EPA's first 50 years. The papers from the conference have now been published in the Case Western Reserve Law Review, and are available online. The collected presenters and authors included the current EPA Administrator, Andrew Wheeler, and EPA veterans from each of the last four administrations.
Here is a listing of the papers:
- Jonathan H. Adler, The Environmental Protection Agency Turns Fifty
- Andrew Wheeler, The EPA at Fifty Symposium: Keynote Address
- E. Donald Elliott, A Critical Assessment of the EPA's Air Program at Fifty and a Suggestion for How It Might Do Even Better
- Joseph Goffman and Laura Bloomer, Disempowering the EPA: How Statutory Interpretation of the Clean Air Act Serves the Trump Administration's Deregulatory Agenda
- Joseph E. Aldy, Evaluating Regulatory Performance: Learning from and Institutionalizing Retrospective Analysis of EPA Regulations
- Cary Coglianese and Daniel E. Walters, Litigating EPA Rules: A Fifty-Year Retrospective of Environmental Rulemaking in the Courts
- Emily Hammond, Toward a Role for Protest in Environmental Law
- Michael A. Livermore, Polluting the EPA's Long Tradition of Economic Analysis
- Brian F. Mannix, The EPA at Fifty: Time to Give Bootleggers the Boot!
- Wendy Wagner, It isn't Easy Being a Bureaucratic Expert: Celebrating the EPA's Innovations
- Michael P. Vandenbergh, Jonathan M. Gilligan, and Haley Feuerman, The New Revolving Door
- Robert V. Percival, The EPA as a Catalyst for the Development of Global Environmental Law
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Just like with war in Europe (1939-1989), it's time to declare victory and go home. We won -- human feces is no longer floating down our rivers and cars really don't pollute anymore.
So declare victory and shut it down.
CO2 is not a pollutant. As long as the EPA continues its lawful mission Americans will continue to support it.
Why is CO2 not a pollutant? While it is naturally made so are many other pollutants. CO2 is a pollutant because excess CO2 is produced by anthropogenic activities. That excess CO2 can produce harmful effects on the environment, most notably climate change.
When it hits 65, can we force it to retire?
When it hits 64, will we still love it?
Nowadays it needs a new name. Not doing much “protecting”.
In 1996, then Gov. William Weld plunged into the Charles River weeks after a report that it was finally free of raw sewage.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yiGbMmqrYrY
He wouldn't have done that 25 years earlier,
And while Massachusetts can't do anything without regulating it, an organized public swim was permitted in 2013, the water is that clean now. (The color is tannin from leaves and is natural.)
Exactly my point.
For that, we can thank an EPA which was for the most part left free to do its job. Not like now.
It is easy to look around today and see clean air an water. This is because we have had a strong agency committed to maintaining a strong environment. We must pass that environment on to future generations. The words of Gaylord Nelson where never more apt, “The ultimate test of man's conscience may be his willingness to sacrifice something today for future generations whose words of thanks will not be heard.”
Congratulations to the environmental protection agency! I am very glad that their activities continue to increase the pace, because our world really lacks this. But I notice that every day there are more and more defenders. I myself am thinking about creating my own brand for environmental protection. I think to use the services of the agency from the article medium.com/theymakedesign/branding-agency-san-francisco-2a8a3308a038 after all branding is an important and difficult matter. All the best!