The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
Livestreamed Oral Arguments Will Continue at SCOTUS
October arguments will be over the phone again.
This morning, the Supreme Court issued the following announcement about oral arguments for the October sitting:
The Court will hear all oral arguments scheduled for the October session by telephone conference, following the same format used for the May teleconference arguments. In keeping with public health guidance in response to COVID-19, the Justices and counsel will all participate remotely. The Court building remains open for official business only and closed to the public until further notice. The Court will continue to closely monitor public health guidance in determining plans for the November and December argument sessions.
The Court will provide a live audio feed of the October oral arguments to a media pool as it did for the May arguments. The pool participants will in turn provide a simultaneous feed for the oral arguments to livestream on various media platforms for live public access. The oral argument audio and a transcript of the oral arguments will also be posted on the Court's website following oral argument each day.
Additional details regarding media pool distribution will be provided in the coming weeks.
The schedule of arguments for the October term can be seen here.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Looking forward to more toilets flushing!
That’s why it’s called live streaming.
Live streaming AND plopping!
Plop, plop, whiz, whiz, oh what a relief it is!
I think the changes in format are nothing but good: the public gets real-time access to the arguments, and the questioning is more orderly and allows for more balanced participation by the Justices.
I agree. Hopefully this will inspire some reconsideration about public access when the court reopens.
I don't know if the seriatim questioning will survive, but I suspect the Court will have a hard time going back to no-live-broadcast.
I think it would be helpful to have juuuuuuust a little bit more ability for the justices to interact with each other. A little bit of ability to do followup on subsequent justices' questions would be nice.
Overall, tho, I would take the current format over the previous format any day.
I'm glad for this! I enjoyed listening to arguments, and watching arguments of my state court. I'd be happy for this trend to continue.
RBG can hide, but she can't run ...