The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
Today in Supreme Court History: January 13, 2014
1/13/2014: NLRB v. Noel Canning argued.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Man, five years already? Crazy. I went to four of the six arguments that week -- this one, EBIA v. Arkison (bankruptcy), Marvin Brandt v. United States (railroad law and whether abandoned railways were easements that reverted to the owner), and McCullen v. Coakley (sidewalk protests outside abortion clinics). Great week of cases. Strange term overall, tho -- they ended up unanimous in something like 60%+ of the cases, but some of that "unanimity" was in outcome only, with significant disagreement among concurrences (including in Noel Canning).
*six years
Also Scalia read his concurrence (!) from the bench in Noel Canning, and given the theoretical hash of things that was Breyer's opinion, I was entirely unsurprised and quite gratified to see it.