The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
The D.C. Circuit Will Soon Livestream Oral Arguments
And yet the Supreme Court is still reluctant to release same-day audio recordings.
Starting this fall, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit will provide livestream audio of almost all oral arguments. A statement released by the court reads:
Chief Judge Garland announced today that the Court has voted to live stream audio of all oral arguments, except when classified or sealed matters must be discussed. The Court has been live streaming audio of oral arguments upon request since October 2017. Chief Judge Garland stated that "this is an important additional step in bringing transparency to our proceedings."
The court will also post audio recordings of oral arguments by 2pm on the days of argument for those who miss the livestream. [Update: As I should have noted in the initial post, the posting of same-day audio is not new for the D.C. Circuit. It has been doing this in most cases since 2013.]
Meanwhile, a few blocks away at One First Street, oral argument audio is not released until the Friday after argument. Even though the Supreme Court has released same-day audio without incident or problem in high-profile cases, the justices remain reluctant to allow people to hear the Court's arguments the day they are delivered.
Whatever the merits of livestreaming (or argument video) the Supreme Court's policy is unduly and unreasonably restrictive. Perhaps the new openness of the D.C. Circuit will help induce a change.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Personally, I'd like to see justice kept "off the street", if you will. The sc breaking with its tradition seemed like an error.
Not clear how having oral arguments as they occur as compared to Friday (except for a few cases ... but the public shouldn't think the others aren't important!) affects that much one way or the other.
"Chief Judge Garland announced today "
Ha ha.
"the Supreme Court's policy is unduly"
...or un-duely?
They will come around. The slow way is the sure way.
No wonder the NFL decided it needs to get its viewers back...with this sort of competition breathing down their necks.