How Does the National Debt Affect You? A Budget Expert Explains.
Higher debt means lower wages, higher interest rates, and fewer opportunities, says Romina Boccia of the Cato Institute.
HD DownloadThe federal government is on track to borrow nearly $2 trillion this year. And while that budget deficit is a major concern for many Americans, the specifics of how and why the government borrows so much money can often seem confusing.
That's why Reason asked Romina Boccia, director of budget and entitlement policy at the Cato Institute, to break it down into more manageable morsels.
So why does the federal government borrow so much? Because "it's much easier for Congress to promise benefits to certain constituencies than to ask U.S. taxpayers to actually pay" for those benefits, explains Boccia, who also writes a Substack newsletter about federal fiscal issues.
The most expensive of those benefits are the so-called entitlement programs—Social Security, Medicaid, and Medicare—which run on autopilot and are not subject to the regular appropriations process. "Most of the spending growth now, and most of the growth in the budget deficit in the United States, doesn't come about as a result of Congress voting for spending bills but rather is automatically baked into the budget," she says.
Higher debt and bigger deficits could create the circumstances for a "severe fiscal crisis," warns Boccia. Even if that doesn't happen, the growing budget deficit can have serious consequences for Americans.
"Because debt is so high, it is actually reducing economic growth," says Boccia. That means lower wages and fewer opportunities. The higher debt is also driving interest rates higher, which means "you have to pay more in interest if you want to borrow money" for a mortgage, to start a business, or to pursue higher education.
So what can be done about this mess? Boccia says that's the "trillion-dollar question."
Channeling Milton Friedman, Boccia says the key is to give politicians the right set of incentives so that even the wrong people can make the right decisions. She favors the creation of a fiscal commission within Congress that could give lawmakers political cover to make necessary changes to Social Security and Medicare, the two old-age entitlement programs.
Those programs should be reconfigured to focus on keeping older Americans out of poverty, says Boccia, "rather than just transferring income from working Americans to retirees, regardless of need."
- Video Editor: Danielle Thompson
- Video Editor: Regan Taylor
- Camera: Cody Huff
- Camera: César Báez
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I pay less in taxes next year.
Quick article.
Kamala would have extended the tax cuts for low income Americans like you…but even if you make $500k a year, which I doubt you make, the tax cut that ostensibly lowers the top rate ends up making housing and private school tuition more expensive and thus it costs you money. The top tax rate cut only helps people that make several million dollars a year and they drive up housing costs which drives up property taxes and property insurance and then will pay however much necessary to send their kids to private school. And guess what? The upper income hike is all that is necessary to get the deficit/GDP ratio to 3%!!! So as someone with a net worth in the millions I prefer a lower deficit/GDP ratio to lower taxes because it is better for my investment portfolio for America to have manageable deficits than out of control deficits like we will have if this monstrosity passes.
lol
Yes, Bessent’s 3-3-3 Plan is hilarious. And him lying to Congress is very funny.
Social Security, Medicaid, and Medicare—which run on autopilot and are not subject to the regular appropriations process.
Is this the same 'autopilot' process that DOGE started to look at and Reason went into fainting spells, trying to explain to us about COBOL code and how it's literally unfixable and therefore has incorrect dates?
No. It's the same autopilot responsible for most of the spending that reason is ignoring when they use the cbo debt metrics despite it not being able to be changed by reconciliation.
Because "it's much easier for Congress to promise benefits to certain constituencies than to ask U.S. taxpayers to actually pay" for those benefits
LOL. You could also drop the benefits you know. we ARE paying for the benefits. Through inflation.
All I can say is Thank God Reason has access to experts who can tell us shit we already knew. Bravo Reason!
You didn’t know Dick Cheney was assraping for 8 years…or maybe you just enjoyed it?? 😉
The [Na]tional So[zi]al[ism] BILL is coming home.......
Guess the people shouldn't have built a ILLEGAL (by the US Constitution Supreme Law) Nazi-Empire in the first place.
Welcome to the soon to-be Venezuelan repeat story.
This is why literally every commenter here, and literally every single human being on the planet - including your parents - hate your f'ing guts Eric. Because you're a gutless coward gimp faggot wannabe jOuRnAliSt.
Just SAY IT.
Say it out loud, make it very clear, and very decisive:
End social security. End Medicare/Medicaid.
But you can't even bring yourself to say that, can you. Because you're afraid of how unpopular it might make you. Just like the Congressmen do. You coward faggot.
You’re on point, but stop coddling Boehm. You’re being far too nice and sugar coating it. You need to really take the gloves off and tear into him.
Let's start with
At just under $36 trillion, or over $270,000 per household, the national debt has become America’s second mortgage.
Now what is causing this?
The debt is a byproduct of an expansionist federal government that now spends roughly 25 cents of every dollar earned in America.
What to do?
We must cut government spending. Far from conferring free benefits, government spending robs the economy of its strength today and stunts its growth tomorrow.
There , all the rest is commentary
“She favors the creation of a fiscal commission within Congress that could give lawmakers political cover to make necessary changes to Social Security and Medicare, the two old-age entitlement programs.”
Yeah, a fiscal commission, that’s the answer!
The commission would release the report recommending many ways to cut the budget and there would be a lot of sound and fury before nothing was done.
No, something would be done. It's just that that something would be even higher spending and no cuts.
A Plan
Excerpt from the novel, Retribution Fever:
We have defined the problem as follows: An excess of governmental spending incurring debt fueled by excessively taxing the creative and productive and by outright robbing the savers.
We have targeted an appropriate, achievable goal as follows: To have a sound economy with a sound, stable currency.
We have designed a plan as follows:
1) To abolish the Sixteenth Amendment; thereby, terminating the federal income-tax and replacing it with a basic, flat, national sales-tax of 10% — 15% including universal medical coverage through the private sector.
2) To stabilize the currency based upon production not consumption.
3) To issue a new dollar with value equal to that of 1913 when the Federal Reserve Board came into existence.
4) To withdraw the power to steal by way of the balloting box; whereby, recipients of governmental welfare had determined the largesse that they themselves received.
5) To limit coinage and printing of new monies. Of note, recently, the introduction of a voluntary, private, alternate system of virtual monetary exchange paradoxically created a new path for complete economic tyranny via an involuntary system of governmental, virtual, monetary exchange identifying the holder of each unit via his Social Security Number or other number and every exchange transacted.
6) To set interest-rates by investors in a free and open market rather than by governmental bureaucrats closeted in a closed room.
7) To prohibit federal debt except during declared wartime.
We have provided a system of measurement. Track the Gross Domestic Product with no items “off-budget”.