Why These Workers Want a Lower Minimum Wage
Eliminating the tipped wage in Washington, D.C., has led to higher prices and fewer restaurant jobs.
HD DownloadWhen labor activists came to D.C. demanding higher wages for restaurant workers, they clashed with an unexpected adversary: restaurant workers.
A few decades ago, waiting tables or bartending in the nation's capital could be quite lucrative. "The money was amazing. At the end of a good bar shift, what some people had to spend an entire week scraping in an office nine to five, I could make that in a night," says Damon Dixon, a restaurant worker of 30 years.
In 2016, a national movement started pushing to raise the minimum wage to $15 an hour. But D.C.'s tipped workers, including servers and bartenders, weren't affected, thanks to a carve-out that let restaurants pay employees a fraction of the minimum wage as long as their tips covered the difference. Known as the "tip credit," this policy is common across the U.S.
Labor activists aimed to eliminate the tip credit, arguing that workers should receive the full minimum wage on top of any tips they earned. Saru Jayaraman, founder and president of One Fair Wage, has led the movement.
When D.C. voters passed a referendum to eliminate the tip credit in 2018, the city council overturned it at the urging of restaurant workers. "The tipping system works well for everybody. It works well for guests, for them to show their direct appreciation," says Joshua Chaisson, a bartender who runs the advocacy group Restaurant Workers of America. "Most importantly, [it] allows us to maximize our income."
According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, in 2022 D.C. waiters and waitresses were making on average $50,790 a year, including tips—the highest wage for restaurant workers in the country. Asked about this figure at a local press conference, Jayaraman told Reason that the data were wrong. "We have a research department. We look at the Bureau of Labor Statistics. We look at Square, which tells you how much people earn in tips. That's so not true. I'm happy to send you the data," she said. Her team didn't respond to any follow-up requests.
One Fair Wage got the measure back on D.C.'s ballot in 2022, and it passed by a wide margin. "Seventy-five percent of them voted for it because it was a free toaster," says Geoff Tracy, the owner of two D.C. restaurants. "I would say that 98 percent of voters don't understand the compensation structure for full-service restaurants."
The elimination of the tip credit is happening gradually, but restaurants are already feeling the pressure. Tony Tomelden—owner of The Pug, a beloved dive bar—says he's feeling the strain. "It is daunting trying to figure out how to make all these ends meet," he says. "For the first time in 17 years, I raised prices." He is currently required to pay $10 an hour, double what it was two years ago. By 2027, that will likely climb to around $18 an hour before tips.
Meanwhile, Tracy estimates the wage hike will add $400,000 to his payroll per location each year. "That's like doubling my rent," he says, adding that these costs will inevitably get passed on to customers.
"We're watching a beloved bar back, a beloved busser, a dishwasher have their jobs taken away," says restaurant worker Valerie Graham. "Not because our owner-operator is an evil billionaire but because they're an independent business owner who had to make some business decisions and there's a callousness with which our industry is talked about."
Jayaraman claims that restaurant closures and job cuts in D.C. aren't caused by the elimination of the tip credit. "Since the initiative, more restaurants have opened, more workers hired," she explains, referencing a report that One Fair Wage published last year, titled "The Sky Is Not Falling; the Floor Is Rising."
While restaurant employment did initially rise after the measure passed, jobs have decreased by 4.3 percent since their December peak, according to Federal Reserve data.
Jayaraman challenged those numbers too. "If you look at government data that the D.C. Attorney General has approved, we have 10 percent more restaurants in the District of Columbia, seven percent more restaurant jobs, and 6.8 percent higher wages. And that data was confirmed by The New York Times in April of this year," she told Reason.
The New York Times article that she cited (actually published in March) in fact contained inaccuracies about the number of restaurant employees in the District. When Reason asked the Times about the errors, the paper ran a correction.
As D.C. restaurant jobs decline, some establishments are introducing "service charges" to help cover wage expenses. Yet servers are often taking home less, and some believe the policy caps their earning potential.
Voters, Dixon argues, are "on a savior complex trying to save people that didn't need saving in the first place. The tips is the main reason why we got into this industry."
Despite dictating how restaurants are supposed to work, Jayaraman has yet to operate a successful restaurant. In 2006, a group she cofounded—the Restaurant Opportunities Center—launched a New York City establishment called Colors that tried to pay its wages along the lines Jayaraman has been demanding. It quickly faced financial trouble, cut salaries, faced lawsuits, and ultimately closed. The group's two other restaurant ventures also failed.
One Fair Wage aims to end the tip credit in at least 25 states by 2026. Those jurisdictions would do well to take note of what is happening in D.C. Formerly thriving businesses are now grappling with closures, vacant storefronts, staff shortages, and escalating prices.
"Put the pieces together in the puzzle," says Graham, "and we can see that this is not working."
Photo credits: Aashish Kiphayet/Sipa USA/Newscom; Erik McGregor/Sipa USA/Newscom; Murray Head / Splash News/Newscom; Zhao Hanrong / Xinhua News Agency/Newscom; ERIC MENCHER/KRT/Newscom; TOM PENNINGTON/KRT/Newscom; GEORGE SKENE/KRT/Newscom; Chris Maddaloni/Roll Call/Newscom; Tom Williams/Roll Call/Newscom; Douglas Graham/Roll Call Photos/Newscom; Lezlie Sterling/ZUMA Press/Newscom; John Pendygraft/ZUMA Press/Newscom; Doug Duran/Contra Costa Times/ZUMA Press/Newscom; St Petersburg Times/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom; Kyndell Harkness/ZUMA Press/Newscom; Bob Larson/ZUMA Press/Newscom; Jeff Malet Photography/Newscom; DAVID MAIALETTI/TNS/Newscom; Brian Cassella/TNS/Newscom; Antonio Perez/TNS/Newscom; Lenin Nolly/Sipa USA/Newscom; Leigh Vogel/UPI/Newscom; Allison Bailey/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom; Peter DaSilva/San Francisco Chronicle via AP; Amy Harris/Invision/AP; ROCUnitedCreative/Flickr; US Department of Labor/Flickr/ sipaphotostwenty104835; imageBROKER/Jim West/Newscom; krtphotoslive943170; dpaphotosseven459233; Karl-Josef Hildenbrand/dpa/picture-alliance/Newscom; Douglas Graham / Loudoun Now/Newscom; Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call/Newscom; rollcallpix159022; imageBROKER/Jim West/Newscom; Bob Kupbens/Icon Sportswire CCO/Bob Kupbens/Icon Sportswire/Newscom; Lindsey Nicholson/Universal Images Group/Newscom; Frumm John/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom; Leigh Vogel/UPI/Newscom; Erik Mcgregor/ZUMA Press/Newscom; Fibonacci Blue, CC BY 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons
Music Credits: "Eureka" and "Currents" by Ardi Son via Artlist; "Novembers" by New Day via Artist; "Singularity" by ANBR via Artlist; Sophisticated Nostalgia via Nobou via Artlist; "The Morning Light" buy Fancesco DAndrea via Artlist; "Loreland" by Marco Martini via Artlist; "Life's Journey" by idokay via Artlist; "Odd Numbers" by Curtis Cole via Artlist; "Separation" by ANBR
- Audio Production: Ian Keyser
- Graphics: Regan Taylor
- Writer: Katarina Hall
- Color: Cody Huff
- Graphics: Adani Samat
- Cinematography: César Báez
- Cinematography: Alex Rosen
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I often give waitresses a big tip.
But do you pay them?
Let’s just say I make a deposit.
I don't know if the people who want to raise server wages are stingy assholes who don't want to tip, delusional assholes who think everything is better in Europe, or hubristic assholes who think servers don't know what's good for them.
Either way they're assholes.
None of the above. It's hard for Unions to collect dues from people working in a "tipped" position. Just look at who funds "One Fair Wage". It's SEIU, and other Unions. When San Francisco and other Blue Cities were raising their minimum wage the Unions that were pushing for it wanted their members to be exempt.
And givermints which want wages documented so they can tax them.
"...When San Francisco and other Blue Cities were raising their minimum wage the Unions that were pushing for it wanted their members to be exempt..."
Nope.
The SEIU had various union wages keyed to M/W; when it goes up, the union members wages go up, and the same low-skill workers are replaced by automation.
I will be the very first person onboard the "tipping is a stupid cultural practice and we should all just stop doing it" train, so in a sense I do believe server wages should "rise", but the market sets wages, not the government. The minimum wage is always zero. If these people weren't happy earning $2 an hour (plus tips), they wouldn't work these jobs. No one puts a gun to their head and tells them to bus tables for a living.
My objection to tipping is that it adds a weird sense of uncertainty about how much a transaction will (or should) cost.
My objection to tipping is that it adds a weird sense of uncertainty about how much a transaction will (or should) cost.
Another objection is the more recent expansion of expectations. If you take care of me at the table, that's tipworthy. If you deliver food to my house that's tipworthy. If I'm picking up at the counter that's not tipworthy. If I pick up something in a package and your machine asks for a tip I'm never coming back.
Also I used to round to 20%. But once I found out that's the new expectation I went back to 15 unless the service is great. Otherwise we'll be at 100% before I die.
Another objection is the more recent expansion of expectations.
I agree with you there. The proliferation of those card readers with a tip on the screen for people who are not being paid server wages really ticks me off. Unfortunately the solution will likely be to end server wages, not to tell people in roles that don't deserve a tip to get bent.
When did this start changing? I remember 10% decades ago. 15% then followed for a while. That slunk up to 18 and 20 quickly. Now I see it trying to default to a 22% tip.
Who the fuck is driving this and why the fuck should we be expected to follow along without even acknowledging tip inflation?
I would say it started in the 2010s, pre-covid. But it really accelerated in and just after covid.
> ... If I pick up something in a package and your machine asks for a tip I’m never coming back.
That trend, I believe is likely less of a condemnation of the establishment and more so of the programmers of the point-of-sale transaction machines. I suspect it is more likely a case of lazy developers making "Do you want to add a tip" the default of the machines with less-than transparent instructions on how to (if possible) customize the machines to forgo the tip prompt.
more so of the programmers of the point-of-sale transaction machines.
That's just an excuse. The business is the customer when buying those, if they wanted an option of zero there would be one or they would pick a different supplier.
> That’s just an excuse. The business is the customer when buying those, if they wanted an option of zero there would be one or they would pick a different supplier.
I disagree. Far too often, the suppliers all provide the same base-line kind of product, then hide the ability (if it exists) to customize the software by turning certain features on or off. It’s kind of like finding pockets in women’s dresses. Women for damned sure want them, but sparingly few clothing manufactures make any that are worth a damn.
Often times, the people making the purchasing decisions of point-of-sale products either (a.) don’t have the time, the tech-savvy, or the budget to wade through the options and pick the best fit for their business or (b.) are too far removed from the day-to-day running of the retail/service outlets to care.
And, while more manufacturers may be putting reasonable pockets in women's dresses, it has taken a long time to get there. The same goes for the point-of-sale systems. It's going to take a long time for the message to reach the manufacturers before it changes.
Why is the tip amount based on the bill? How much more service in involved when I order steak instead of a sandwich?
Correct. I'd rather have the fair price of my product and service up front. It's bullshit that businesses and society feel the need to bully us into paying the inflated wages of servers. I don't understand why this entry level job is somehow outside of minimum wage laws and simultaneously they earn much more in less hours than entry level construction.
I think tipping is good because it weeds out bad servers. In places that don't do tipping, service tends to suck. There's no incentive to for servers to give a fuck. They're just another drone getting paid shit wages, whereas good servers can make bank off of tips. That makes being a tipped server a great job for college students, single mothers, etc. Another great thing about tips is that they're cash in hand. Don't have to wait weeks for a paycheck.
My objection to tipping is that it adds a weird sense of uncertainty about how much a transaction will (or should) cost.
I generally tip 20% unless the service sucks. So I anticipate adding $10 to every $50. The math isn't that hard. I always tell people that if they can't afford to tip well, they can't afford to go out.
Where did you get that 20% number though? I’m old enough to remember when a 13% tip was considered “standard” and I still tip that much as a “standard” amount. The server doesn’t tell me what the expected tip is, but yet clearly they expect something. If they are expecting 20% from me and they get 13%, suddenly without anyone saying a thing they are working for less money than they expected to.
If the restaurant set its prices and wages appropriately, I can make informed decisions about how much I want to spend, the waiter can make informed decisions about how much he wants to earn, and everyone is happy. Tipping just makes a mess out of something that should be fairly simple.
> My objection to tipping is that it adds a weird sense of uncertainty about how much a transaction will (or should) cost.
My objection to tipping is that it directly offloads the cost of labor onto the consumer.
For one, that distorts the market feedback regarding the cost of labor in those sectors. Where other sectors of employment rely on wage-signals to set their compensation to compete with other employers, the tipped industries don't have nearly as much information.
Secondly, in most any other transaction, I can choose who I "hire" for a service. Not so much in tipped services. Furthermore, if I am paying the greater share of a laborer's wages, then they work from me. I am their employer. But that's not how it worked in tipped services. It grossly distorts the employer-employee relationship.
"...My objection to tipping is that it directly offloads the cost of labor onto the consumer..."
Imbecilic. You think raising wages would do otherwise?
"I will be the very first person onboard the “tipping is a stupid cultural practice and we should all just stop doing it” train,..."
No surprise; you are an ignoramus who has probably never found effort on your part to help your income.
Being a janitor isn't a career.
Wait a little while and the unions who promoted the minimum wage change will demand the restaurants cut wages and allow the employees their tips, especially if the tips become non taxable.
Impossible. Paul Krugman assures us that increasing minimum wages do not reduce jobs.
The New York Times article that she cited (actually published in March) in fact contained inaccuracies about the number of restaurant employees in the District. When Reason asked the Times about the errors, the paper ran a correction.
It would be interesting to see how these errors occurred. Given that NYT writers function as far left activists it's very likely they were given the original numbers by an activist group, maybe ever One Fair Wage specifically. This is how media works in collusion with academia and NGOs to make legislation seem justifiable even when it's smoke and mirrors, similar to how the media used Elizabeth Warren's propaganda study on personal bankruptcies to help pass Obamacare.
And the basis is criminal and a zero-sum resources game.
‘Guns’ against those ‘icky’ people will supply us a living wage.
but ‘Guns’ don’t make sh*t; so the zero-sum resources begin.
DEMANDS don't make sh*t. They require a Supply.
Every Demand requires respect of the Supply. ( You have to *EARN* )
> The proliferation of those card readers with a tip on the screen for people who are not being paid server wages really ticks me off.
I touched on this buried upstream in a reply, so let me reiterate it here. It is a problem, but I (perhaps naively) don’t believe it is the fault of the businesses using those readers. I suspect that it is more likely a problem with lazy developers of point-of-sale transaction machines making “Do you want to add a tip?” the default setting. Very few build point-of-sale systems for specific companies or industries. They have a model of churning out one-size-fits-all, out-of-the-box solutions that simply don’t adequately fit all needs, business styles, or practices.
As a Gen-X, legacy systems business applications developer of 27 years, I regularly cringe at just how bad consumer-facing user-interfaces are.
I may be the first person in the world who've noticed this. In my former service sector job, when I gave extra, proactive, attentive service to customers, I got bigger tips. Maybe this discovery could be of use in the business world.
A fair wage! Let your feather hat soar over that one, because it's already been invented. Something must be keeping a business open, mustn't it? And it will need to hire the best employees to remain open unless it cannot get any of the best ones to apply. Do not think of raising the wage to attract better laborers when you have detached people wanting to raise the wage only for poor laborers who can't get jobs when effective laborers do not need this service. Meanwhile, these detached persons can sabotage motivational notions to work smarter by guaranteeing that fair wage.
Along with such ideas, we could retool the wheel so that it adheres to the pavement fairly rather than only when it rolls onto a surface. And why shouldn't the bulk of the car compensate the wheels more, seeing as wheels have a harder job to do because of the load?
Your wheels really ought to be given more income to do their job. Tread would be the very stuff! You need a tire that can hold up to more pressure than it has been holding up to so that its compensation can be measured fairly. "Equal tread for equal pay!"
V 10.
"If you look at government data that the D.C. Attorney General has approved"
At which point someone should have punched her in the throat.
Is it the higher wage that eliminated restaurant jobs?
Or that COVID shut down many of them down?
Or that remote work has reduced teh customer base to a point where there aren't enough to support the excess of restaurants to feed them?
Or is it the higher cost of food?
Or is it the inflated prices some restaurants have charged post-COVID to make up for the crash in revenue and they're desperately trying to hold on?
The wage being the single source of restaurant jobs dropping seems dubious.
Bullshit.
You can argue a house isn't selling because it's painted pink. In which case, I'll happily call you an idiot.
Simply, it isn't selling because it is overpriced for a pink house there. Lower the price and it WILL sell.
All goods and services (labor) will sell at the market price.
You.
Are.
Full.
Of.
Shit.
A fundamental problem is the idea that the voters should decide what free economic interactions are permissible. If an employer wants to hire a worker, spelling out the conditions for the employment, the worker can accept them or refuse. The voter should have zero input into that transaction. This is how successful economies are created.
Yes.
Planned economies do not work everywhere and always.