Jennifer Burns on Milton Friedman's Legacy
Was Milton Friedman the most important libertarian of them all?
HD Download"Was Milton Friedman the most important libertarian of them all?" Reason's Nick Gillespie asked Stanford historian Jennifer Burns during a live taping of The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie podcast in New York City. Burns is the author of the masterful and definitive new biography of the Nobel Prize–winning economist, titled Milton Friedman: The Last Conservative.
Friedman was arguably not just the most influential free market economist of the 20th century but the central figure in building the broad political and intellectual coalition that successfully challenged Keynesian economics and the top-down rule of experts in so many aspects of our lives.
Gillespie and Burns discussed Friedman's conceptual and methodological breakthroughs in economics; his way-ahead-of-his-time collaboration with female economists such as Anna Schwartz and his wife Rose; his role in popularizing free market economics through his columns in Newsweek and the TV series Free To Choose; his controversial engagements with politicians such as Richard Nixon and Augusto Pinochet; and his role in ending the military draft and championing school choice.
This discussion was taped at the Reason Speakeasy, a monthly, unscripted conversation in New York City with outspoken defenders of free thinking and heterodoxy that doubles as a live taping of this podcast.
1:51– Milton Friedman's life, ideas, and influences
18:48– Friedman's ideas and impacts on economics
38:22– How Friedman thought about school vouchers and guaranteed minimum income
46:24– Friedman's ties to the Pinochet regime and his role in Chilean economic reforms
1:19:50– The monetary revolution in Brazil and Friedman's views on the International Monetary Fund
- Video Editor: Adam Czarnecki
- Audio Production: Ian Keyser
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Milton Friedman was wonderful. But if Milton Friedman were still alive, you'd be complaining that he was too conservative, because supported the death penalty, and was tough on crime (other than drugs, which should not be a crime to begin with). The Libertarian Party was once tough on crime, but today, the libertarian intelligentsia are often soft on crime. Indeed, some self-described "libertarianish" intellectuals view criminals as victims of society who deserve handouts: https://libertyunyielding.com/2023/08/03/bad-vs-good-libertarians/
Wow; that was GREAT Nick! Many thanks to Jennifer for that enlightening presentation! Keep up the good work!!!
OK, the comments for this piece are seriously fucked up.
To expand on that, I saw about 10 comments and added my own (but with only partial success). When I refreshed the page, I saw only 2.
For regular viewers of the Soho Forum debates, Gene Epstein asks a question as an audience member at 58:00 and Nick imitates him by telling him over and over to get to the question.
And Gene actually deserved it. His "question" goes on and on....
Disagree. Friedman was of the Eastern European Libertarian School (EEL) and not of the American Libertarian School (AL). He was wrong on monetary policy, didn't understand the cause of the great depression, and applied eastern european social norms on America (abortion/marriage/traditional marriage). Ron Paul did much more for libertarians in America than Friedman ever did. Old world libertarianism is more akin to cultural degeneracy and Keynesian economics.
Uncle Milty was a slaver.
Uncle Milty sold out self-government and Americans to enrich the the international ruling class, particularly the CCP.
He was surely aware of Adam Smith's argument for tariffs to offset local taxes on production. Instead he calls it a "free" market to tilt the US market in favor of the CCP's slave produced goods.
Disagree. Friedman was of the Eastern European Libertarian School (EEL) and not of the American Libertarian School (AL). He was wrong on monetary policy, didn’t understand the cause of the great depression, and applied eastern european social norms on America (abortion/marriage/traditional marriage). Ron Paul did much more for libertarians in America than Friedman ever did. Old world libertarianism is more akin to cultural degeneracy and Keynesian economics.
https://triamtmt.com/tmt-bar-price/