Blame the Government for the New Banking Crisis? Live With Lyn Alden, Arnold Kling and Zach Weissmueller
Join Reason on YouTube and Facebook Thursday at 1 p.m. Eastern for a discussion of the Silicon Valley Bank meltdown and bailout of depositors with economist Arnold Kling.
"We have learned over the last few days that many small and mid-sized banks in this country are Zombies," writes Arnold Kling, a senior scholar at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University and former economist for the Federal Reserve system and Freddie Mac.
Following the run on Silicon Valley Bank, former U.S. Treasury Secretary Larry Summers urged the federal government to guarantee the money of all the bank's depositors and warned that "now is not the time for lectures about moral hazard." But Kling insists that "past crises," such as the savings and loan collapse of the 1980s, "were bungled by authorities who were blind to the moral hazard problem."
And Lyn Alden, founder of Lyn Alden Investment Strategies, says "banks are basically highly-leveraged bond funds with payment services attached, and we treat it as normal to keep our savings in them." She argues that the Federal Reserve makes it nearly impossible for banks to hold the bulk of their customers' deposits in cash because "regulators want banks to be reasonably safe, but not 'too safe.' They want all banks to be leveraged bond funds to a certain degree, and won't allow safer ones to exist."
Join Reason's Zach Weissmueller this Thursday at 1 p.m. E.T. for a discussion about the federal government's decision to guarantee all deposits at the failed Silicon Valley Bank with Alden and Kling. Watch and leave questions and comments on the YouTube video above or on Reason's Facebook page.
Photo credit: Shen Hong / Xinhua News Agency/Newscom
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"[N]ow is not the time for lectures about moral hazard."
Perhaps. But now *is* the time for investigations into banking "regulation".
I have just received my 3rd payment order and $30,000 that I have built up on my laptop in a month through an online agent…!v76) This job is good and his regular salary is much better than my normal job. Work now and start making money online yourself.
Go here….… http://Www.Smartjob1.com
Always fair game, that.
Perhaps it could start with the relaxation of regulations on small- to mid-size banks during the Trump Administration?
Okay, fine. It was all Trumps fault.
BUT. You need to design your government so that people like Trump don't periodically screw everything up. Remember? You probably blamed the last financial crisis on Bush deregulation. It seems like there are always going to be horrible horrible idiots like Bush and Trump .... so maybe you need to think about that before you create a system where politicians run the banking system?
You know how Republicans blamed Obama and Biden for failures in Iraq and Afghanistan? Well, just MAYBE you ought not try nation building that requires competence across a 20 year span.
Your blaming Trump for the banking failures is just like blaming Obama for Iraq failures. DON'T PURSUE GIANT BOONDOGGLES IN THE FIRST PLACE.
it is also the time to investigate the Biden Crime family. Not that much will happen a long as Joe occupies the oval office and controls the corrupt FBI and DOJ. But exposure is important too, Joe, Hunter and his brothers need to be exposed for what they are, and new family members in on the influence peddling and selling out America scheme for cash are being exposed too. Try NewsMax, OAN, the First, Gateway Pundit or Breitbart to hear about it, because Reason’s Biden supporters will not report on Biden’s corruption or will cover it up.
While Reason also doesn’t put the problem with banks right now where it belongs, on Bidenflation, at least they were able to restrain themselves from blaming this on Trump.
I've made $1250 so far this week working online and I'm a full time student. I'm using an online business opportunity I heard about and I'AM made such great money. It's really user friendly and I'm just so happy that I found out about it. Here's what I do, .for more information simply.
Open this link thank you......>>> http://Www.jobsrevenue.com
Oh, but it is indeed a time for commenting on moral hazards, just different ones than in 2008. ESG and DIE crap are moral hazards in their own way.
True, but they're unlikely to trigger a financial crisis. They're just a trendy way to make our banking systems relatively uncompetitive.
Can anyone say “toxic assets”?
British shrike was too busy pushing other leftist narratives like the Southern Strategy party switch to comment.
Excellent work, Mike. I admire your effort because I currently generate more than $36,000 each month from just one simple online business! I am aware that you may start earning a solid life en-10 online with as little as $29,000 and these are just basic internet operations tasks.
.
.
Click the link—————————————>>> GOOGLE WORK
"...She argues that the Federal Reserve makes it nearly impossible for banks to hold the bulk of their customers' deposits in cash because "regulators want banks to be reasonably safe, but not 'too safe.'..."
Pretty sure the alternative would also require a large delta between interest paid for deposits and interest charged for loans in order for a bank to be profitable, or even cover expenses for a non-profit credit union.
JFC- you blame the government for doing too much, you blame them for doing too little. Absurd.
This article is like first grade levels of thinking on display.
The die was cast for not letting banks fail with the Clinton Administration when Larry Summers and Rueben convinced Clinton to buy Mexican bonds to save the large banks that had bought them. Banks learned that they could pass risk on to the Federal government. So much bad banking policy came out of the Clinton Administration like the repeal of Glass-Steagel (which gave us to big to fail and allowed Wall Street investment brokers like Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan to become federal banks) coupled with the Mexican Loan policy. I also believe they forced banks to extend high risk loans to inner city borrowers for which Obama, as a community activist, helped get get a bunch of loans that defaulted.
"...I also believe they forced banks to extend high risk loans to inner city borrowers for which Obama, as a community activist, helped get get a bunch of loans that defaulted..."
The sub-prime mortgages 'encouraged' by the gov't which, at the time, turd assured us was evidence of 'market failure'.
They main problem with bad mortgages was not the subprime loans in formerly redline areas. It was the altA loans - mostly white folks flipping or leveraging up their house in order to buy consumer shit. It's why the crisis started in FL, NV, AZ, and CA. Not Detroit, Baltimore, New Orleans, or Mississippi
As always, citation(s) missing.
Assertions from lefty shits =/= argument or evidence.
Glass-Steagall had nothing to do with GS and JPM becoming banks (nor much with the 2008 crisis--it was the pure investment banks which failed first, not the TBTF banks). JPM has always been a federally regulated bank, but you probably meant Morgan Stanley. GS and MS became banks during the 2008 crisis so they could qualify for bailouts.
Banks could have written sub-par loans all day long if they hadn't been combined with good loans into crack securities like CDOs...
In any case, saying "Clinton started it" is a juvenile excuse for continuing to do it, isn't it?
Where did you get that I was advocating continuing the policy. I indicated that it was bad policy. Repealing Glass-Steagal allowed banks to expand their businesses into areas that banks traditionally did not go, like insurance. Some of the banks indicated that they were going to become real estate agents and inspectors.
Regardless of who did it first, it led banks to believe that the Feds would backstop them and protect them from the risk of bad judgement. Repealing Glass-Steagel reduced government control which was a good thing, however, the Clinton Admin removed the risk for making bad decisions. It is what is happening with the current Biden policy.
I’ve made $1250 so far this week working online and I’m a full time student. I’m using an online business opportunity I heard about and I’AM made such great money. It’s really user friendly and I’m just so happy that I found out about it. Here’s what I do, .for more information simply.
Open this link thank you……>>> http://www.join.hiring9.com
Silicon Valley Bank meltdown and bailout of depositors with economist Arnold Kling.
The Biden admin says it's not a bailout.
We've been over this. It is not a TAXPAYER funded bailout.
And the 2008 bailouts actually made money for taxpayers!
Vaccines, safe and effective!
Masks work!
No one was ever locked down!
Rig count up!
No haperinflation!
Who needs bills/bonds?
The Fed pays 4.65% on reserves.
https://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/reserve-balances.htm
That is a spread any stupid ass banker (Woke or Wingnut) can profit on.
1.5% below inflation. Good deal.
Inflation is profit.
turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
Google is by and by paying $27485 to $29658 consistently for taking a shot at the web from home. I have joined this action 2 months back and I have earned $31547 in my first month from this action. I can say my life is improved completely! Take a gander at it what I do.....
For more detail visit the given link...................>>> http://www.jobsrevenue.com
Yes, it's all the government's fault. The grifters and incompetents who wrecked the bank did it because the government made them do it. They were forced Under Threat of Prison by Government Employees With Guns to make stupid decisions and profit from self-dealing.
It's the government. It's always the government.
Jesus H. Christ! What is the matter with you people at Reason?
The libertarian way to deal with this is to privatize deposit insurance. The FDIC is the government doing its usual crappy job of something better left to the private sector.
Then banks could go out and buy deposit insurance for whatever maximum amount they want, not just $250K. They'd then be able to advertise that your deposits are insured up to $100M or whatever, but in return for the security, you'd earn a lower interest rate, commensurate with the increased cost of the insurance.
Make sense?