Livestream: Homeland Security's Backdoor Social Media Speech Regulation
Livestream with Nick Gillespie, Robby Soave, and Zach Weissmueller
The Department of Homeland Security has greatly expanded its efforts in recent years to control the flow of information across major social media platforms, documents obtained and published on Monday by Lee Fang and Ken Klippenstein of The Intercept reveal. Texts and emails show tech executives in regular communication with government agents about their efforts to battle "misinformation" related to topics ranging from the pandemic to U.S. elections to the war in Afghanistan. One document shows that Facebook even created a special portal for government agents to report problematic posts.
"Behind closed doors, and through pressure on private platforms, the U.S. government has used its power to try to shape online discourse," write Fang and Klippenstein.
Reason's Nick Gillespie, Robby Soave, and Zach Weissmueller on Thursday at 1 p.m. Eastern will discuss these revelations, what it means for free speech on the internet, and what steps might be taken to counter these attempts by the national security state to police American political discourse by exerting pressure out of the sight of the American people.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Over/under on:
Republicans pounce
Build/buy your own Twitter
mY pRiVaTe CoMpAnY
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35400 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot (odi-04) of greenbacks online from $28000 dollars, its simple online operating jobs
…
Just open the link————————————–>>> http://Www.RichApp1.Com
It wasn’t homeland security who banned, censored, cancelled and erased the sitting president of the United States along with every citizen who spoke up about election irregularities.
True. In fact, no one did that.
Haven't listened yet. I'm guessing that they all act like The Intercept revelations were unanticipated and they totally never saw this coming.
Yeah, it's not like POTUS let this cat out of the bag at a press conference in front of the MSM or something.
I am making 80 US dollars per hr. to complete some internet services from home. I did not ever think it would even be achievable , however my confidant mate got $13k only in four weeks, easily doing this best assignment and also she convinced me to avail.
For more detail visit this article… http://www.Profit97.com
It’s not like this hasn’t been going on for at least 4 years if not longer. I submit that the DHS Ministry of Information was merely a way of codifying what they’d already been doing for years, but just wanted an official department to coordinate efforts.
Then of course when they got called out, they simply returned back to the shadows to continue what they'd already been doing.
Musk saw it.
Well, we're finally to "It's happening"
So WHICH internet company has actually been PUNISHED by Government Almighty, and in what way? "The bum under the bridge threatened to hold his breath until I did what he told me to do" doesn't qualify!
None. They all obeyed and got weekly briefings on who to censor from government agents.
Are you keeping ignorant on this on purpose?
Yeah that's a really weird line.
"Hey look, gov and biz colluding together!"
"WELL WHO GOT PUNSIHED FOR THAT, SMARTY PANTS?"
“WELL WHO GOT PUNSIHED FOR THAT, SMARTY PANTS?”
That's the very simple question that I am asking. (Well actually, who got PUNISHED, for those of us smart enough to use a simple and intuitive built-in spell-check). And you have NO answer!
They obeyed so escaped punishment. Is that a possibility?
If they had REAL balls they would DISOBEY so that they could then take it to court!
Also this...
I pay (PAY! With MY money! I OWN!) for my own web site at Go-Daddy. I say some VERY sarcastic and un-politically-correct, intolerant things about cults like Scientology there (and Government Almighty as well). I am QUITE sure that a LOT of “tolerant” liberal-type folks at Google etc. would NOT be happy with the types of things I wrote! Yet, if you do a search-string “Scienfoology”, Google will take you STRAIGHT to MY web site, top hit! #1!
https://www.google.com/search?q=scienfoology&nfpr=1&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjPzZqf0dXsAhUCT6wKHez9DNwQvgUoAXoECDEQKg&biw=1920&bih=941
So WHERE is all this bias on the internet? Also see my post below...
Parler and Trump's "social" site obeyed mere THREATS from Biden's liberal Government Almighty... And Biden told them to CENSOR LIBERALS?!?! What planet did you say you were from?
Parler censors liberals... https://www.techdirt.com/2020/06/29/as-predicted-parler-is-banning-users-it-doesnt-like/
Hey you conservaturds! You should STEP UP TO THE PLATE and put up a NON-censored web site, and IGNORE the mere THREATS from Government Almighty... I bet you could make a KILLING on this wide-open market! (Pussy-shit 'fraidy-cats!)
Guess getting called out by the rest of the libertarian community for two years finally sunk in to the establishment liberaltarians.
It is purely perfunctory. Now that can say they've dealt with it and never mention it again.
Just like the Paul Pelosi incident, which only grows ever more curious.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11390497/Paul-Pelosi-answered-door-cops-did-NOT-say-distress-new-police-account-claims.html
Rather strange way to report someone who just "broke in" to your home late at night.
At this point, how have they NOT forfeited Sec 230 provisions? They were censoring on behalf of the government. The government officials should be brought up under civil rights charges for violating the First Amendment...but the sites should be punished as well.
So if damikesc tells people NOT to disagree with damikesc... Is THAT, too, violating the First Amendment? You're telling people to censor themselves!!! PUNISH yourself NOW, ye of the obscenely exposed punishment boner!!!
Being given a "heads up" by the government is not "censoring on behalf of the government", but if it was, it would be unacceptable.
Adding some topical context:
https://www.techdirt.com/2022/11/02/bullshit-reporting-the-intercepts-story-about-government-policing-disinfo-is-absolute-garbage/
Thanks for the link; I will save it!
You need more specific knowledge on how to fast build an audience if you want to develop your channel. I received assistance from https://gyre.pro/ . I thought that replaying previously recorded programs will help me fast attract new viewers, and the statistics support this.