Tired of Disney not bending to their partisan sensibilities, two politicians update their theme parks.
Photo Credit: John Angelillo/UPI/Newscom; Robert Ng/SCMP/Newscom; Nick Morris/ZUMApress/Newscom; flickr, Justin Ennis; Anthony Behar/Sipa USA/Newscom; Image Press Agency/Sipa USA/Newscom; Jennifer Lynn flickr; flickr, Jeremy Thompson; ALLIE GOULDING/TNS/Newscom, Xinhua News Agency/Newscom;
Flickr, harshlight; Flickr, Ken Lund; PJA/Paul Jacobs/WENN/NewscomStarring Andrew Heaton and Austin Bragg; written by Heaton, Bragg, and Meredith Bragg; Produced by Meredith and Austin Bragg; edited by Austin Bragg.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I wonder who will take personal offence to this one. It's was too damn funny and true to not cause certain people to shout at the screen in anger.
SQRLSY will be the first to lose his shit.
Sarcasmic was the first person to take offence to the idea of someone taking personal offence. And he did it before the first person to actually take offence even took offence.
Meet Sargent Sarcasmic, time cop for the comment police!
Everything perceived as rep or dem. Us or them, easy peasy.
Like juveniles angrily trying to pound square pegs into round holes.
Is that a libertarian thing?
Libertarians don't pound others into holes nor do Libertarians pound the holes of others without adult consent. The same can't be said of Der Fuhrer's Jackbooted legions.
And no Libertarian theme park would have razor wire, mined perimeters, watch towers, machine gun turrets, gas chambers, and mass graves.
Fuck Off, Nazi!
You are feebly making accusations that you can’t prove and requests that are always ignored.
SQRLSY will then proceed to gobble up any shit lost.
(Thanks for setting me up for that one)
This might be the best video yet from these guys.
This was seriously top shelf!
Indeed, got my blood pressure up against both sides. I especially liked the two statues.
But it's practically begging for a third person touting libertarian Disney.
I would imagine libertarian Disney to essentially be Las Vegas.
That's "adult" Disney, not "libertarian" Disney. Though the way the two major parties act perhaps there isn't much of a difference.
Yeah, I don't think I would use the term "adult" for the two major parties.
I have actually collected $39,220 merely six weeks by easily working part-time on my laptop.~yui63~When I have lost my office post, I was troubled & eventually I obtained this best career achieving this I was able to have thousand of dollars just staying at my home. Each individual can start this chance and obtain extra money online by:-
.
Visiting this web……. https://brilliantfuture01.blogspot.com/
How about you just give me your home phone number so I can call you directly about this great offer?!
Might want her to send a few nudes first. Just to be sure it’s worth the effort.
Most intelligent post all week!
sarcasmic is jealous that the spambots are more coherent than his Sqrsly rants.
And you would for Libertarians? Lol
With Jiminy Cricket as the mascot. He was always the street-smart Disney character. Robin Hood and his Merry Men and Feifel and Friends would be great freedom-loving additions. The Park Ranger, Humphrey the Bear, and their Bear Buddies would be out there with their pokers and bags preventing "The Tragedy of The Commons."
The Song of the South cast would be there, not as apologists for racism, but for lessons in Libertarian Stra-te-gery. Br'er Fox and Br'er Bear captured Br'er Rabbit by exploiting his sociable nature with The Tar Baby, and Br'er Rabbit escapes them by appealing to the lure of the forbidden Briar Patch. Lots you miss out on when you're "Woke."
But it's practically begging for a third person touting libertarian Disney.
Action Park closed in 1996. 😉
Action or Acton?
"I wonder who will take personal offence to this one. It's was too damn funny and true to not cause certain people to shout at the screen in anger."
Well, not Trey Parker. He would love it (as do I).
Loved it.
Also who else thinks the "Goofy Suit checking for Genitals" is an idea with real potential?
That's the part I like least.
Both in the video and in real life.
Also, Goofy is the correct choice for verifying the nature of guests, due to his own natural ambiguity. I mean, he's not a dog, but he his a dog, or is he? I mean, is he a dog identifying as a human? Or a human identifying as a dog? Or a furry? I just never figured it out. Why is it that he walks around on two feet and talks yet Pluto is an all- fours, no-talking traditional doggy dog?
It's okay for Pluto to sniff your butt, because he's a dog, yet if Goofy sniffs your butt...
Were you watching Stand By Me last week?
He wears pants and drives a car!
The same can’t be said of SQRLSY, or Hank.
Also, Goofy is the correct choice for verifying the nature of guests, due to his own natural ambiguity. I mean, he's not a dog, but he his a dog, or is he? I mean, is he a dog identifying as a human? Or a human identifying as a dog? Or a furry? I just never figured it out. Why is it that he walks around on two feet and talks yet Pluto is an all- fours, no-talking traditional doggy dog?
Tell me you're a racist without saying, "I'm a racist."
Oh, that one's easy.
"I believe in CRT"
Literally nobody takes offense at your lame ass, cringe worthy, stilted partisan political humor, sarcasmic. They just think you're a lame ass, cringe worthy boomer for clinging to 20 year Jon Stewart bits and creepily inappropriate Lindsay Lohan coomer flicks.
How many accounts do you create a week? I swear every time I mute your antagonistic ass a couple days later you're back with the same tired attacks, only with a new screen name.
Good job sarcasmic! You managed to reply from your sarcasmic handle instead of slipping into your Sqrsly copypasta or your Joe Friday shtick and forgetting which account you're logged in to. Inflation eating into your plastic jug vodka budget this month?
It's an honest question. Mute mutes accounts. Not screen names. So if you simply change your display name you're still muted. That means that every time I see you saying the same stuff after I've muted you, you had to have created a new account.
So, out of curiosity, how many throwaway email accounts do you create a week and you reregister over and over and over?
create a week *as* you reregister
typo - oops
Don't worry, we're used to your constant stream of typos. It's the predictable result of being piss drunk by 8 AM every day.
He also think I’m you. He’s not very smart.
Being a top programmer and network security expert I'm sure you could probably figure that out.
Perhaps. But the only data I have available is raw comments. So I'd have to painstakingly search and you're about as important as a dead fruit fly so that's not happening.
Do you even know?
Just for estimation purposes, how many a week, and for how many years?
I could do an extrapolation. I like that word. It's fun to say.
Ex! trap! o! lation!
Mastering multisyllabic words is indeed quite a remarkable achievement for you. Congratulations!
Btw you don't need to collect, analyze, or extrapolate any data whatsoever to figure out how account registration works. This isn't rocket science.
I would need to search to find some of the many, many accounts of yours that I've muted after you spewed the same old shit, before creating a new email address and a new account for me to mute later for the same reason.
But you're the one creating all the accounts, so I figured it might be easier to just ask.
The fact that you're mystified as to how I create so many email accounts is just... wow. It's not quite as embarrassing as when you claimed you were fleeing to Glibertarians never to return, then returned 12 hours later after having had to ask the non-technical users at Glibertarians how to perform basic HTML text markup after bragging that you had taken the "learn2code" pill, but it's close.
Lol. Sarc thought a commonly used word made him sound smart. Hilarious.
Bet he claims he called up all his buddies to laugh at people calling him dumb online again with that one.
Do you mean the cool dudes with the half million dollar lake house?
Cut Sarc some slack. Some of those words are hard to say after a bottle of bottom shelf liquor or a few bottles of hobo wine.
Well now you know who took personal offense at it.
You were quite literally the first person in the thread to start whinging like the pathetic cunt you are about Republicans abusing the poor Disney corporation for failing to extend their 80 year old copyrights for another 20 years. I don't think sarcasmic had anything to do with the production of this video, what with his full-time job as a professional programmer who doesn't know how to markup text in HTML and his multiple vacations to $200,000 AirBNBs that he has to split with 8 roommates to afford for a weekend. Pointing out that he's a cringey boomer with the most lame ass sense of humor quite possibly in the history of internet culture wasn't a criticism of the video. It's cringey boomer humor, but it's certainly not offensive.
"It's cringey boomer humor, but it's certainly not offensive."
It certainly is that. Like an SNL skit from the 80's.
It was also trying hard to be both sides, but they didn't really understand the motives of either.
Need to be the first to scream at the screen Did you? So pathetic. Just sad you don't realize your projection.
These guys haven’t put out a video yet that I didn’t find hilarious.
Over on the Youtube version Kleptocracy sockpuppets and shills cheer that the show makes fun of "both" (as in we cain't count ta thuree) parties.
love it.
Yesterday Land looks fun.
Because everything is political.
You know who started it?
*clears throat*
Adam?
The snake.
But Republicans and conservatives are just as bad because they launch hysterical moral panics about trivial shit like Disney covering up child molestation for 3 decades and pass draconian laws that prevent blue haired trannies from telling 5 year olds how wonderful it is to cut off your dick.
B-b-b-but the Republicans are racist because the parties switched or something, and a kid's dick can grow back if they don't want to be trans anymore.
It’ll grow back, right?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SatdbVeP0Tw
Hitler?
Political struggle or debate is the key to good political theory. A theory is just a bunch of words— sometimes interesting to think about, but just words, nevertheless—until it is tested in real life. Many a theory has delivered surprises, both positive and negative, when an attempt has been made to put it into practice.
(still reading)
(from the 1970 pamphlet)
Can you imagine what would happen if women, blacks, and workers (my definition of worker is anyone who has to work for a living as opposed to those who don’t. All women are workers) would-stop blaming ourselves for our sad situations?
I imagine that fifty years later the Government would be hell-bent on forcing those others to accept that blame and pay for it.
@00:55 was particularly funny.
Minor cultural criticism: @3:43 Austin needs to say, "Your pistol caliber needs to start with a .4 or higher to ride this ride."
And, OMG, do I have to take my hat off to @2:52, which slid by on the first delivery.
Thanks for pointing that out!
Holy shit! This was so good!
Where liberal arts majors dress up like ninjas and break shit!
More proof that most conservatives aren’t funny.
What?
sarcasmic is piss drunk at noon. It's a day that ends in 'y'.
What?
I used to think it was Tulpa. But he more plays with people as opposed to taking pride in saying mean things. This one goes through accounts like candy. They always have two names. Spews the exact same shit, gets muted, and then shows up again like a bad penny.
Umm. You tried calling out multiple people not in thread and then cry about other people? Lol.
Not going to unmute him, but was he bitching about me?
No, the chief troll just got on his high horse about Tulpa.
As you can see, sarcasmic is now so inebriated that he's forgotten that he "muted" me and is compulsively replying to everything I post. He can't help himself. He will return in about 2 hours after this thread is deader than disco and corpse-fuck it with his Sqrsly One sock, compulsively replying to every one of my posts again, and then reply to himself a few times in a desperate attempt to make believe that he hasn't outed his Sqrsly One sock a dozen or more times, and then spend the next week or so claiming he was hacked and his handle was stolen.
He continues to deny he has fucked up and posted his sqrsly rants under his sarc name multiple times. It is just weird.
But has as much dedication to the delusion as shrike does with his socks.
That's now what I said, idjit. I've muted a hundred plus previous accounts of yours. Just not this one yet. Letting it ride to see how deep of a hole you're going to dig for yourself. What's really cute is how well you and JesseAz are getting along. It's like attack trolls of a feather stick together.
It's now what you said? Lmfao. I wonder if more booze or less booze would help.
You quite literally said you had muted me in your 3rd post in this comment thread. But uh, sure, I'm the one digging a hole here.
Yes I've muted you. Your other accounts. You really aren't very bright.
Bright enough to keep track of my own posts within the same thread within a 20 minute span of time, which is a lot more than can be said for you. Want to keep dancing for me like an organ grinder's monkey, or do you think you can keep the memory of having "muted" me in your head for more than 10 consecutive minutes this time?
Sounds like most of the biblical bulliers. I couldn't tell or care which because the dork is already muted on my screen.
That's right, grandpa. All the bible people here are bullying you.
I thought they were ‘mystical bigots’.
You keep think I’m him too. I am not.
I see where you're confused. KAR-n evil 9 is one of sarcasmic's half a dozen or so sockpuppet accounts, from which he posts his cringey lame ass boomer attempts at humor and "parody", not realizing that it's not 2004 anymore, and none of his cringey lame ass boomer attempts at humor are considered edgy or funny anymore.
Sarc is too much of a drunk to run more than his sqrsly sock.
When literally everyone knows that I lack the imagination or tenuous grasp of sanity to create what Squirrely post, that's clearly just you tying to score points with a troll.
Too funny.
Perhaps if you didn't keep drunk-posting your same 5 Sqrsly copypastas you've been using since 2008 on your sarcasmic account because you're a drunken imbecile who can't keep track of multiple browser windows or tabs you could escape the same of your sockpuppetry.
ok Mary. I'm muting you now. Go buy more wine.
Oh for fuck's sake you drunken imbecile. You were doing so good this time keeping your socks in order, I was almost proud of you. You accuse me of being Mary Stack from your Sqrsly account. You accuse me of being Tulpa from your sarcasmic account. Now let's see if you can remember that you've "muted" me for more than 5 consecutive minutes or if I can keep you dancing on my marionette strings for another 2 hours.
He's too much of a drunk to successfully run even that sock, he's outed it a dozen or more times accidentally replying to himself from the wrong account and posting his same copypasta from the wrong handle. He's a buffoon and a moron, but it doesn't stop him from operating multiple other socks.
And they never get the ‘Hihnt’ and go take a dirt nap.
I think KAR is more likely Buttplug/Shrike.
Touché
More proof that sarcasmic is even worse on his alt handles than his main.
Fart
Anyone who thinks this isn’t funny has serious problems.
Or is under 60 and doesn't think WKRP In Cincinnati was the funniest comedy show of all time.
Seriously, this is some unbelievably cringe boomer shit. It's like watching Nick Gillespie gaze into his navel about how The Velvet Underground and Nico was politically subversive high art.
To quot Daria about the valve underground
"do I file this under self-important posers or underrated geniuses
It was mediocre, but I'm happy some people enjoyed it.
"Tariffs! Wait, or is it free trade?"
You left out him asking "what day is it."
Both. Carpet-biting Yankee Lords of Creation squinted down their monocles at slave-banging hayseed dems who thought 10% a reasonable tariff for revenue. Industrial giants dissed that as pusillanimous "free trade." The expression was expectorated the way NSDAP Republicans spit "pergrEssivs" or "BAYbeekillerz."
Where does Comstock figure in?
He just bear to not being Comstock up frequently. I think he wrote. A term paper on it when it was passed, and it’s one of the few things he can discuss.
Except Democrats aren't using the government to try to force Disney to do anything and Republicans are.
And I think we have a winner for the first person to get offended by this! Congrats, Tony.
It does represent the not very bright, remarkably ignorant, perpetually offended groups.
There's a rather important distinction between culture evolving organically and people having opinions vs. legislating to take away people's freedom because of that fact. Naturally libertarians are steadfast in their lack of confusion on this issue, being the big anti-government guys.
You guys just tried creating a Ministry of Truth and craft speech laws biweekly.
You're the last people in the world who should be pretending to be laissez-faire when it comes to pushing others around.
It sucks when your intended victims hit back, doesn’t it? You fucking crybaby swishbuckler.
Activists pushing Fringe post-modernist/neo-Marxist philosophies via elementary school curriculums is not the “natural” evolution of culture.
States absolutely have the power over curriculums paid for with public money.
So, not a compelling argument either way.
Rumor has it that you you have the best sense of humor on this site. This is a good example of the rumor being true.
This was better than the usual fare, much like burnt gruel is better than an ebola sandwich.
Just wash it all down with some Drano. Or even an off brand drain cleaner. They’re all good.
Bake the cake!
Because if you're going to be a big-government tyrant, you might as well be a hypocrite about it.
Tony, you’re the biggest hypocrite here.
If Disney doesn't want to be political, and I agree they should not want to be political, maybe they should stop being political. No one made Disney decide to take sides on the anti grooming bill in Florida. When you start taking political sides, things get well pretty political. Who knew?
But guess who did decide that half their characters would be woke?
The problem was that these businesses drank a bunch of HR kool-aid over the past 20 years, proclaiming how Millennials want to work for a company that represents their values and fulfills them.
Essentially, we have had HR and other idiots turning companies into a big daycare. A daycare run by the children. And they have told those children over and over that they are there to make sure those kids never have hurt feelings.
I try not to say it out loud, but working for a large tech company full of people 20 years younger than me has given me a really terrible view of Millennials. I, literally, think of 30 somethings as children at times.
I work at a grocery store and have met a few. One swears he can’t buy a house because he’s a millennial (makes as much or more than I do), is more concerned about my grandfather potentially being a racist (80 years ago) than his efforts to fight the empire of Japan in New Guinea, and blames literally everything on “end stage capitalism”.
Met some 20 somethings who skipped college that may end up alright, though.
Revoking half century old special government privileges for multinational media conglomerates with a market cap larger than Mexico's GDP is tyranny.
That was funny because I don't have the least clue what you're trying to say and what clue I do have relegates you to Hihn/Tony levels of historical political unawareness and self-contradiction.
George and EIC weren't tyrants, it was those damned colonists oppressing everyone in the Kingdom!
Serious question: have you ever been clinically evaluated for mental retardation? It wasn't a complicated or historically difficult statement you dumb fuck. Briggs Cunningham had stated that Disney entered the political arena of its own volition. I sarcastically pointed out the "Republicans pounce!" narrative in response to Disney losing some of its half century old legal privileges like having their own municipality where their private police force has covered up child molestation and having their copyrights extended by acts of congress for 50 fucking years after they would have otherwise expired. Clear enough, or shall I go fetch the crayons?
So then what was the point about 50 yrs. and having a market cap larger than Mexico's GDP? Would you be OK if they reactionarily revoked the privileges of a company that owned 2 parking meters for 20 min. You do know to which George and EIC I was referring right? Adolph and Porsche? Go fetch your crayons, and when you get back use them to write down the exact number of years and exact market cap at which you think it's OK for the government to extend and then revoke protections.
The Original LP Platform urged repeal of laws paying inbred yokels to point loaded service pistols at pregnant women and doctors before 100 days were up. That got America the first electoral vote for a woman and increased our vote count 4700% by next election. Then the anarcho-nazi caucus gutted that into a plank saying the government ought to ignore the 13th Amendment and let rednecks enslave women at gunpoint while we ride by and wave. That was the last vote surge the LP got until Gary went pro-choice.
‘Anarcho-Nazi’………..
Disney has been the engine of American conservatism for a century. Their idea of putting a gay character in a movie is to put a regular character in a movie and say he was gay in a press release.
It wanted to stay out of it, but since Disney has a large gay fanbase and even a gay day at the park, they got political pressure from the folks. It became untenable for them not to oppose this bill given the media spotlight on the company, and oppose it they must, because it's a bill that targets vulnerable minority groups for government oppression. You should oppose it too, unless you're a fascist bigot.
They can make all the homo movies they want. No one gives a shit. Just don’t put out gay kid’s movies.
No more grooming.
You're a monster and a moron, but you knew that.
Yes, I suppose someone who opposes your child rapist friends and stops them from grooming small children would appear to be a monster to you. But make no mistake you pedantic little poof, I have a dozen times your brain power.
You are an insect among gods here.
Family theme parks that aren't registered card carrying members of our party? Inconceivable! What? They didn't like our proposed legislation! Take away their copyrights!
p.s. Imagine they had a culture war and on one came...
And maybe we have the second place person to take offense! Congrats, Brandybuck.
And here I was expecting the prize to go to Arizona and Canada.
Who's Canada?
ML
Ah, gotcha.
Remember folks, sarcasmic never tries to start shit. He's just a poor, innocent little lamb being picked on by mean girls.
I would love to be picked on by the cast of Mean Girls. Especially if wrestling were involved.
Also cytotoxic (dba chemjeff; de oppresso liber), but we won't talk about that, because sarcasmic's jingoism ends where his Marxist circle jerk begins.
"Also cytotoxic"
I didn't know that.
He basically admits to a) not understanding arguments f others and b) being a troll here.
But he probably thinks favored nation clauses are a good thing along with the other leftist shit he defends.
Lol.
Troll, meet troll. Too funny.
Whats funny is you denying your primary motivation in this thread was to start slinging shit. Did Jeff cry on your shoulder last night? Feel you have to get revenge?
Don't know what you're talking about. I've got a life outside Reason.
And if you take "someone will be offended" as something personal, then that's on you not me.
I've got a life outside Reason.
You spend 12-16 hours a day, every day of the week, shitposting on every single article posted at Reason using a half dozen sockpuppet accounts in addition to this one. Life truly is a banquet, huh?
Lmfao. You literally cited the dude by name right here you drunken fucking buffoon. Jesus fuck my guy, if you're going to lie about what you've said it's better to do it in a different thread or at least wait a couple of hours. Not everyone has drunken blackouts like you.
Oohhh, things are lively here tonight!
Jesse isn’t the troll here.
Youre the primary victim dummy. Lol.
I dont take offense to this. So your judgment here is as wrong as everything else. So far 2 leftists jumped in to decry it. Weird.
But this was just you promoting ideas right?
Right on cue...
What cue was that. You trolling? Thats all you did dummy. So congrats on being a troll?
You taking that personally was your fault, not mine.
Taking what personally? You called me put by name dumbass. Nothing you say offends me. Just pointing out your behaviors.
Are you drunk already?
Um, no. I indirectly expressed my surprise that you weren't the first to take the video personally and get mad with "And here I was expecting the prize to go to Arizona and Canada."
There are plenty of ways you could have reacted to that. Humor. Clarity. Curiosity.
But you of course chose hostility.
Thanks for being as predictable as the sun.
I guess we can add "indirect" to the dictionary full of words sarcasmic doesn't understand.
You also could have reacted to this video with humor, clarity or curiosity, but you donned your persecution complex and started predicting what someone may have said, whom you've claimed to have muted dozens of times. Seriously dude. Don't get me wrong, I will host a kegger on the day you finally succumb to cirrhosis, but take a little break. Get some clarity.
Sarc, you literally stated upthread that you expected Jesse and Mother to be the first to be offended by it. Logic dictates that your very first post was obviously in reference to them (at the least).
How do you imagine anyone wouldn’t take it personally when you call them out by name?
Sarc, you literally stated upthread that you expected Jesse and Mother to be the first to be offended by it.
And that justifies calling me a incestuous drunkard. Good to know.
I say "This humor is so truthful that some might take offense, and we know who they are" and that's equivalent to "This guy is a drunken piece of shit who rapes his daughter."
That's what these guys cheer.
By JesseAz's own definition, not condemning is praising and not praising is condemning. So he's all about cheering the guys who say really sick shit about me by virtue of the fact that he's never said boo about it. If anything he agrees.
Who accuses someone of that? That's sick.
And you're all about defending him.
Fuck off.
I thought better of you Nate, but people make mistakes.
Holy hell man, I said, let alone implied, no such thing.
I know the “not condemning is praising and not praising is condemning.” actually comes from a broader conversation that I’m more than willing to have, but for the record, I wish everyone would lay off the stuff with anyone’s kids, it’s just plain fucked up. (Except for giving shrike shit about posting links, because fuck him for doing that.)
Funny how you never mute Jesse. You must love him very much.
"and that's equivalent to "This guy is a drunken piece of shit who rapes his daughter."
Remind me again of when I said that, you bitter little troll.
I always defend Sarc on that subject. As I don’t beIieve he has a daughter. Or was ever married.
It was sarcasm. So sorry you can't recognize it.
My bad if I did. The p.s. part threw me.
My sarcometer generally recognizes exclamation points to be a strong sign of hyperbole. I thought you were going along with the theme of the video.
Hyperbole is not sarcasm, but then who could expect a lame ass boomer with "sarcasm" in his username to understand the meaning of the word.
I'm a boomer now? Keep digging.
You're probably technically genx, just barely, like Gillespie. You're still closing in on 60, a divorced child abuser, who thinks Jon Steward, Lindsay Lohan and 70 year old boomer rock musicians are culturally relevant. For people under 60, "boomer" is pretty much a catch-all term for retards like you who are stuck in 2003 and can't get out.
I'll give you points for imagination, but other than being divorced you were spectacularly wrong about everything.
And I'm creeped out that you think that much about me.
Lmfao. You quite literally invited Tulpa to meet you in the bathroom of a shitty 80s industrial band composed entirely of 65+ year old men, have posted links to and quotes from Jon Stewart bits from the early to mid 2000s, call anyone who disagrees with you a Mean Girl, and you've posted probably somewhere in the neighborhood of 500-600 drunken rants about your ex wife and how she got custody of your kids. This inbetween your confessions of being an alcoholic and drug addict who lives on the streets and spat in people's food when you were working as a fry cook who didn't know what a Cuban sandwich is (ironic, considering the boomer rock musician you invited Tulpa to come see with you is a fucking Cuban). You really should consider taking a break from the shtick for a while and sobering up so you don't keep making ridiculous mistakes with your own autobiographical details. How's your Sqrsly sockpuppet's cancer-stricken wife who has to fend off hordes COVID-infected wypipo every time she goes to the hospital? Has she been raped by any Mormons from your KAR-en sock?
I’m not sure he’s KAR-en. That one recognizes me, while Sarc thinks I’m Tulpa. Funny thing is, he never asks. He just makes assumptions and proclaims them.
If anyone asked, I would tell.
I'm actually the real Tulpa...
yes, I'm the real Tulpa
All you other fake Tulpas are just imitating...
Will the real Tulpa please stand up?
Gillespie is definitely a Boomer, regardless of his age. His taste in music, the endless search for meaning in triteness.
Ahh, yes, the sarcasmic classic. I was only pretending!
That cartoon is the closest thing to sarcasmic's modus operandi here that I've seen yet.
Libertarians for extending copyrights for 3/4 of a century!
What's the deal with politics? I mean, Republicans, Democrats, they're just two sides of the same coin! Am I right people?
Have you ever noticed that men and women behave differently? I mean come on people, am I right? This is hilariously funny stuff!
I had to take an airplane the other day and they charged me 50 bucks for a carry on bag! Can you believe that? Am I right people? And what's the deal with masks! I mean if you don't wear one then one group of people will be mad at you, but if you do wear one a completely different group of people will be mad at you! What's the deal with that?
And what's the deal with racism? I mean, you have white people who hate funny Jews like me! And then you have black people who hate white people who hate funny Jews like me! Am I right people?
Jesus fuck. It's like stepping back to 1992. This shit was never funny and it its 30th year of recycling, this actually still tickles you boomer rubes, huh?
Yeah! That’s the ticket!
After that video, YouTube thinks I might like GQ's "Beard Expert Critiques Celebrity Beards".
Great video. Bragg is pretty funny and I will watch anything with Heaton in it.
Also, this comment section is more of a shitshow than normal, thanks to the usual suspects yelling at each other.
Haters of a feather bitch together. Am I right, people?
There was a time when Disney goons "inspected" hippies at the entrance. Acidheads had to time things so they weren't tripping at the gate in order to get in and groove on the scary rides.
So?
Never-mind every Republican shot was a reactionary to Democrat Dictation.. And seems they ran out of shots so decided to use Goofy Bathroom checks and Anti-Choice about 3-Times each.
This isn't a D vs R thing. Disney decided to become political, on top of advocating teaching sexually inappropriate materials to young children.
The text of the Democratic Disney sign that flashes by too quickly to read without pausing:
In this amusement park we believe
Mice can wear pants or dresses
No duck should have a pile of gold coins
Gift shops are privilege
Fastpast is late stage capitalism
We self-cancel our older films
Government should extend our copyrights forever
The Republican Disney sign:
Let's go Bambi
I had to attempt the pause-pause three time before I could finally get the right frame to freeze. TOTALLY WORTH IT. Hilarious!