The war on drugs is winding down, and the war on tobacco is ramping up. E-cigarettes, a safer nicotine-delivery alternative, have contributed to plummeting use of traditional cigarette smoking. Yet the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has effectively made it harder for cigarette smokers to switch by limiting vapes from the market. The agency also recently announced a ban on menthol cigarettes and flavored cigars, which will push more products onto the black market, with all sorts of unintended consequences.
"As tobacco, e-cigarettes, and e-liquids transition from legal to illicit, law enforcement agencies will more aggressively interfere with production, distribution, retail sales, and in some cases even individual use," wrote Jacob Grier, author of The Rediscovery of Tobacco: Smoking, Vaping, and the Creative Destruction of the Cigarette, in a recent issue of Reason. And there's no way to know how far police will go when black market purveyors inadvertently break the law by selling banned smoking products.
There's overwhelming evidence that vaping is safer than smoking regular cigarettes, and that policymakers should be making it easier for Americans to switch. "Vaping isn't completely risk-free but is far less harmful than smoking tobacco," according to the British Royal College of Physicians.
"Laboratory tests of e-cigarette ingredients, in vitro toxicological tests, and short-term human studies suggest that e-cigarettes are likely to be far less harmful than combustible tobacco cigarettes," according to the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine.
"We are in this kind of collective hysterical mindset that really resembles what happened with the war on drugs, back in the late eighties and nineties," says Ethan Nadelmann, the founder and former director of the Drug Policy Alliance and a central figure in the unwinding of America's longest war.
By banning options that smokers overwhelmingly prefer, and leaving the traditional cigarette untouched, the FDA is repeating the mistakes of the drug war, says Nadelmann.
"Every society needs a boogeyman."
Photo Credit: Ingram Publishing/Newscom
Music Credits: "Darkness - Light - Darkness" by SAINT-SAMUEL via Artlist; "Float" by Notize via Artlist; "This Will Be the End" by Shahead Mostafafar via Artlist; "Future City" by Maik Thomas via Artlist; "The Cat and the Panther" by The Original Orchestra feat. Ian Post via Artlist; "Toronto" by Anton Vlasov via Artlist; "Bad News" by Nick Kelly via Artlist; "Beyond" by Stanley Gurvich via Artlist; "Scavenger" by Notize via Artlist; "Apparation" by Stanley Gurvich via Artlist; "A Tender Heart" by The David Roy Collective via Artlist;"Intrepid" by Brianna Tam via Artlist
Written and narrated by Natalie Dowzicky; edited by Danielle Thompson.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Government knows best.
Home income solution to enable everyone to work online and receive weekly payments to bank acc. Earn over $500 every day and get payouts every week straight to account bank. (rrt30) My last month of income was $30,390 and all I do is work up to 4 hours a day on my computer. Easy work and steady income are great with this job.
.
More information. >> https://brilliantfuture01.blogspot.com/
Scrutiny of Republicans who embrace ‘great replacement theory’ after Buffalo massacre
Extremist ideology has found favor with media figures like Tucker Carlson and also with elected politicians and others seeking office. Born from far-right nationalism, the extremist ideology expounding the view that immigration will ultimately destroy white values and western civilization has found favor not only with media figures, such as conservative Fox News host Tucker Carlson, but a host of elected politicians and others seeking office.
Those who have convinced themselves Democrats are operating an open-door immigration policy to “replace” Republican voters with people of color and keep themselves in power permanently include congresswoman Elise Stefanik, chair of her party’s House conference, and JD Vance, the Donald Trump-approved Republican nominee to represent Ohio in the US Senate.
After the Buffalo shooting, the pair are among those receiving blowback for encompassing the conspiracy theory that the killer referred to repeatedly in an online manifesto authorities believe he posted to justify the attack.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/may/16/buffalo-massacre-great-replacement-theory-republicans
Using the senseless deaths of others to further your political views is sick.
But we do need to talk about how these senseless deaths relate to politics, because they do.
The interracial terrorism of the last few years (both white-on-black and black-on-white) is unequivocally due to Democratic and progressive social and educational policies.
Our schools need to stop teaching children to divide themselves up by race and instead teach children again to view people and society in a race-blind way and to become members of a single, mainstream American culture.
I’d never heard of the Great Replacement Theory until I saw it mentioned in the Washington Post, relating to the Buffalo shooting. Sounds like something Liberals made up, to use in charging up their base.
Progressives have predicted that the US will be majority minority and expressed that this is desirable.
Progressives have also been rejecting immigration policies that favor immigration from Western democracies and instead have been favoring large scale immigration from countries with populations that are considered minorities in the US.
It is indeed a "conspiracy theory" to believe that there is a secret group of people who are embracing such policies because they want to "replace Americans". Instead, progressives embrace these policies openly because they want to "end white supremacy" and "increase diversity".
I found something of the sort in a 1910 story by Jack London and a 1927 Monteiro Lobato novel about Americans electing a Black President. London, the "socialist orator," suggested genocidal replacement of China's population. Lobato exploited 1920s racial collectivist extrapolations of differential fertility rates in population share equations. So what about the conspiracy to replace cross-burning national socialism with objectivist ethics? Should a lynch mob go after that?
idiot
How about scrutiny of the New York Times?
The shooter is the product of a progressive, social-justice centered educational system, a system that teaches kids to divide themselves into racial groups and stigmatizes whites as oppressors and blacks as helpless victims.
Racial hate crimes and terrorism are the direct responsibility of Democrats and progressives, who have been doing everything to stir up interracial hatred and destroy a race blind society.
The actual words he described himself with were *center left.* Calling one who says that a far right extremist amounts to a lie. Not just a lie but a deliberate and carefully chosen lie.
the FDA is repeating the mistakes of the drug war
What mistakes? Just look at how much the War on Drugs increased government budgets and manpower and rulemaking authority. I suppose you think throwing tens of billions of dollars at defense contractors with no accountability and little oversight is a terrible thing, too. Defense contractors love it.
So, if you thought that vaping might be more harmful than smoking, you'd be OK with banning it?
That's the progressive view: "ban things that are harmful, permit things that are beneficial (as judged by the experts)."
Stop pretending that you are libertarians.
Not OK with banning it, but we'd have less reason to make fun of banning it. And to make fun of the people thinking that way.
The progressive view is more complicated than you're portraying it. They see no value in the hedonic, only with the utilitarian such as health. Plus they have a prejudice against the application of pure chemicals, i.e. chemicals named as chemicals. Plus they're idealists; it doesn't matter that the practical result of what they promote achieves the opposite of what they want, they just care that perfection demands no ingestion of chemicals for hedonic purposes.
But progressives do roll logs, so they aren't always idealists. They made allies with the counter-culture because the counter-culture was counter to the culture, so if the counter-culture liked free sex and pot, they were for free sex and pot, regardless of what their ideals said.
To glue onto, mimic, infiltrate or stalk is different from to make allies with...
stupid should not be illegal. if you want to kill yourself by vaping or smoking then go ahead, but there is no role for government.
You can’t kill yourself vaping regular e cigarettes. Some weed vape products contained vitamin e and that killed a few kids but no one makes those anymore.
Since 1986, the CDC, US SG, other DHHS agencies, all State/Local Health Departments, the American Cancer Society, American Lung Association, American Heart Association, American Medical Association, American Academy of Pediatrics and other Big Pharma shills have been protecting the cigarette industry (and killing smokers) by knowingly and intentionally deceiving Americans to believe that smokeless tobacco products (e.g. Skoal, Copenhagen, Red Man) are just as or more harmful than cigarette smoking (even though daily smokeless tobacco use poses 99% less risk than daily cigarette smoking).
During the past several decades, those same government agencies, self proclaimed health groups and medical groups (which were given hundreds of millions of dollars by J&J and GSK (makers of Nicorette and Nicoderm) and Pfizer (maker of Chantix) to demonize and lobby to ban and/or excessively regulate and tax all new smokefree tobacco/nicotine products (including dissolvables, snus, and then e-cigarettes), all of which are about 99% less harmful than cigarettes.
From 2002-2009, Mitch Zeller was a lobbyist for GSK who actively negotiated/authored/lobbied for the Tobacco Control Act (in alliance Philip Morris cigarette company and Big Pharma created/financed Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids (a coalition of ACS, ALA, ACS), Rep. Henry Waxman and Senator Ted Kennedy.
From 2003-2009, I called their Tobacco Control Act the "Marlboro Monopoly Act: and exposed how it would protect deadly cigarettes by grandfathering them in to remain on the market while banning all new less harmful smokefree tobacco/nicotine alternatives unless/until FDA approves a multimillion dollar application similar to new drug applications), banning ALL truthful marketing claims by low risk smokefree product manufacturers, and by mandating false and misleading warnings on ALL smokefree tobacco products.
In 2009 (after Democrats took control of the House, Senate and White House), Congress enacted the cigarette protecting Tobacco Control Act into law, while falsely claiming they protected another generation of children from smoking cigarettes.
Also in 2009, Democrat NJ Senator Frank Lautenberg (who received more money from Big Pharma than anyone else in Congress) and Big Pharma funded CTFK, ACS, AHA, ALA sent letters to Obama's FDA urging the agency to ban the import of all e-cigarettes because, as they falsely claimed, were addicting children, were gateways to cigarettes, didn't help smokers quit and might be more harmful than cigarettes. Within days FDA ordered the import ban on e-cigarettes, and US Custom Agents seized nearly 1,000 shipments before the DC federal Court unanimously struck down FDA's e-cigarette ban as illegal. Two justices on the DC Court of Appeals were named Gorsuch and Kavanaugh.
But instead of apologizing to America for illegally banning and lying about e-cigarettes, FDA announced its intent to redefine and regulate tobacco free e-cigarettes as tobacco products under the Tobacco Control Act, which would impose massive costs on small e-cigarette manufactures (whose products could remain on the market only if they submitted multimillion dollar applications and received formal FDA approval).
Then in 2013, Obama's FDA hired GSK lobbyist Mitch Zeller to become Director of FDA's Tobacco Center and impose the new Deeming Regulation, which I correctly pointed out would further protect cigarettes (and harm both smokers and vapers) by banning >99.99% of the 1,000,000+ different e-cigarette products already on the US market.
In 2016, FDA imposed the cigarette protecting Deeming Regulation (while continuing to falsely claim e-cigarettes were addicting lots of children, were gateways to cigarettes, didn't help smokers quit, and may be as harmful as cigarettes).
In response to lawsuits challenging FDA's Deeming Rule, Obama appointed Judge Amy Berman Jackson dutifully ruled in favor of the Obama FDA regulation.
Meanwhile, in the past decade, vaping has virtually wiped out cigarette smoking by high school students, has cut young adult smoking rates in half, has helped millions of smokers quit smoking.
But just as Fauci and CDC won't admit they lied about Covid's origin, lockdowns, mask mandates and vaccine mandates, don't expect CDC, FDA, US SG or any other DHHS agency to admit they've been lying to Americans for decades about the low risks of smokefree tobacco/nicotine products, nor admit the 2009 Tobacco Control Act and FDA's 2016 Deeming Rules protected the cigarette industry at the expense of free markets and public health.
Although federal, state and local government enacted/imposed tobacco control policies have protected cigarettes (which are >100 times more harmful than smokefree nicotine/tobacco alternatives), the good news is that nicotine vaping has sharply reduced cigarette smoking among US high school students from 17% in 2009 to just 1.9% in 2021 (an 89% decline)
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/71/ss/ss7105a1.htm?s_cid=ss7105a1_w
Vaping has also sharply reduced cigarette smoking by young adults (i.e. 18 - 24 years) from 20.1% in 2010 to just 7.4% in 2020 (a 63% decline).
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/71/wr/mm7111a1.htm?s_cid=mm7111a1_w
Unfortunately for honesty, transparency and public health, the CDC continues to refuse to acknowledge that vaping has dramatically reduced cigarette smoking rates among teens and young adults.
What happened to “my body, my choice”?
Mostly your body. But mostly our choice.
Something's got to give soon, because I see a constituency wrapping around a tree and having its left and right wings crash into each other:
What's going to happen with THC and CBD? The same constituency that's anti-nicotine is pro-cannabis. But they're also anti-smoke. They're going to want access to vaporizable cannabinoids and to flavorings for them.
Progressives just want more government power, and the more inconsistent and contradictory laws they pass, the more power they get. It's a feature, not a bug.
That doesn't answer my question. Whether progressives have a lot or little to do with it, what's going to happen with THC and CBD vapes? And with flavors for them?
Although the FDA has no regulatory authority over cannabis products, the FDA (and CDC) have redefined e-cigarettes as any vapor product (that can be used to vape nicotine, THC, CBD, or any other substance).
That's why/how the CDC and FDA falsely claimed that e-cigarette use by teens skyrocketed from 2016-2019 (in order to ban flavored nicotine vapes) as half of the teens who reported vaping (including the vast majority of daily and frequent teen vapers) reported vaping THC. But CDC and FDA misrepresented their own survey data to falsely claim (in dozens of press releases) that all teen vapers were tobacco/nicotine users.
Then in 2019 after THC vapes (that were contaminated) caused severe lung diseases in several hundred teens and young adults, the CDC knowingly and intentionally issued weekly press releases falsely claiming that tobacco/nicotine vapes were causing the diseases (that CDC falsely named E-cigarette Vaping Associated Lung Illness or EVALI).
Waitaminnit... Am I expected to believe that just because a gang of parasites threatens people with guns and denies the facts of reality they would also stoop to the sin of lying?
Brought to you the same sheep that advocate for killing babies.
Believers are a huge boon to governments. Where else will you find a group that keeps their heads down, quietly obedient, and willing to wait til the afterlife to get justice? Fucking idiots are welcome anywhere.
+1
But,
Everything Is a poison, it's simply a matter of dosage.
Absolutely everything you can imagine can overdose and kill people.
"Believers are a huge boon to governments. Where else will you find a group that keeps their heads down, quietly obedient, and willing to wait til the afterlife to get justice? Fucking idiots are welcome anywhere."
Do you "believe" that?
The most deadly thing about the vape franchise is the vape fluid. Not even the nicotine either. It's that the nicotine is so low you have to die from pneumonia before you get a fix. They do this to sell more vape fluid. The whole point was to offer a way to make nicotine safer by isolating it from all the other toxins, but then they go ahead and ad more toxic substances than cigarettes even contain.
Vape biz is a cannibal conspiracy. It's simultaneously the people that started it being everyone that's trying to destroy it. They tricked a bunch of investors and then started milking them....
Catholic mafia....
Old man Delano shipped to These States opium the wreckage of China could no longer absorb--just in time for the Civil War. That entrenched deadly narcotic sells like hotcakes alongside its imitations. Non-lethal latecomers like LSD, mescaline, DMT and plant leaves are banned, confiscated, their traders killed or jailed lest they compete with the entrenched monopolies of nicotine and opiates. Is there a pattern to behold in any of this? Will you vote to continue it or try something different?