Why Did Pandemic Authorities Treat Tattoo Shops Like Titty Bars?
"Government restrictions came in, which literally shut us down," says Paul Smith, who co-owns Red Stag Tattoo in Austin, Texas.
HD Download"There's a huge libertarian streak that runs through the tattooing community," says Paul Smith, who co-owns Red Stag Tattoo in Austin, Texas. "Tattoos are a way of claiming yourself and putting images or words or whatever on your body that no one else can control."
The tattooing industry was hit very hard by pandemic restrictions—even in Texas.
"Government restrictions came in, which literally shut us down," says Smith. "That cost us all of our shop's savings, all of [the owners'] personal savings. [My business partner and I] were kind of wiped out financially."
And yet Smith and his business partner decided not to apply for money from the federal COVID relief program, which was rife with fraud, and in which the federal government handed out about $800 billion to millions of small businesses. That program ultimately cost taxpayers between $170,000 and $257,000 for every job saved over 14 months of the pandemic, according to a National Bureau of Economic Research working paper.
In May 2020, Texas' Republican Governor Greg Abbott allowed hair salons, gyms, and other personal service providers to reopen. But tattoo shops weren't included.
"They took us out of that classification and put us in with businesses like titty bars," says Smith, who blames an outdated perception of tattoo shops for how regulators treat the industry.
"Used to be, [tattoos were] for… unseemly sorts of characters."
Ohio also excluded tattoo shops from the state's reopening plans, which may have been a violation of their First Amendment rights. "Both state and federal courts have recognized tattooing as a constitutionally protected form of free expression," noted Reason's Damon Root in May 2020.
Tattooing started to shed its reputation for degeneracy in 2005, when the reality show Miami Ink premiered on TLC, running for six seasons. Kat Von D, one of the stars of the show, also became a successful model and makeup entrepreneur following her breakout role.
Today, celebrity icons like Joe Rogan, Justin Bieber, Rihanna, and Lena Dunham are heavily inked, and tattoos have become much more accepted in other realms of the music and film industries. Smith says he's all for that kind of popularization.
"As a tattoo shop owner and somebody who makes my money doing it, the more people that want them, the better," says Smith.
Reason's Liz Wolfe, who owes most of her left arm tattoo sleeve to Smith, visited his shop to talk about life during and after the pandemic for tattoo artists. They also discussed the history of tattooing and where the industry and craft might be headed next.
Interview by Liz Wolfe; edited by Zach Weissmueller; camera by Andrew Miller and Weissmueller; graphics by Regan Taylor and Isaac Reese; sound design by Ian Keyser.
Photos: Louis Grasse/PxImages/Icon Sportswire EGS/Louis Grasse/PxImages/Icon Sportswire/Newscom; Abaca Press/Hahn Lionel/Abaca/Sipa USA/Newscom; Gregorio T. Binuya/Everett Collection
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"They took us out of that classification and put us in with businesses like titty bars,"
Why use this for your topline quote? The argument here, the best I can construe it, is that vice should be regulated separately and Tattoo Shops aren't vice. Otherwise, Tattoo Shops are way more intimate and reasonably regulated during infection disease than gross theater.
Reason increasingly has this vibe of arguing for a certain libertine, 20 something, type of cool. I accept that regardless of my own thoughts. When the heck did y'all start to hate titty bars though? That's entirely in your wheelhouse.
And, one less preempt, it's not that the interviewee said it, it's that Reason chose it as their top-line.
I believe Paul Smith did say it:
"They took us out of that classification and put us in with businesses like titty bars," says Smith, who blames an outdated perception of tattoo shops for how regulators treat the industry.
Yes, he did. I meant more that he said it, and that's the pull quote Reason used for it's top-line. It contradicts most of the things they do here.
They also treated gyms, parks, bars, and restaurants like gathering of criminal orginization
"Government restrictions came in, which literally shut us down," says Paul Smith, who co-owns Red Stag Tattoo in Austin, Texas.
Remember when you moved to Austin and why?
Today, celebrity icons like Joe Rogan, Justin Bieber, Rihanna, and Lena Dunham are heavily inked, and tattoos have become much more accepted in other realms of the music and film industries.
"much more" is an understatement. The Tattoo is now the calling card of the suburban soccer mom.
Ugh, and they all look like Homer's web page
https://homerswebpage.neocities.org/
As someone who has no ink, it feels like almost everyone is inked up. I don't really have a problem with them, but haven't found a timeless and meaningful design that I would be happy to have on my body for life. Too often it feels like people get tattoos impulsively for fleeting interests. On the other hand, I totally respect people making their bodies a canvas for interesting art or a mosaic of their life and beliefs.
Also, please link to the video on Youtube as the first line of the article, or as an endnote. The Reason website is not loading things correctly so I can't actually listen to the video.
I finally found the video. I appreciate that at 2:30 or so you used a song that sounds like it's taken from FF7.
That said, I don't understand the point of this video. Is this a pro-tattoo video which is almost entirely outside of politics, or is it an anti-covid restriction video, which isn't argued well.
Also, the introduction where it argues you had tattoos that were trendy but not having long term value is almost entirely anti-libertarian. You're basically making an argument for a very specific hipster version of "I am art, you are a soccer-mom."
That's just awful. It's just smug.
Blood.
Blood is why tattoo parlors got treated differently than hair salons. Blood is a constant at a tattoo parlor.
Bodily fluids are vectors.
That would make sense if they were grouped with plastic surgery clinics. But it doesn't when the got grouped with "titty bars".
The article doesn't tell us if titty bars were allowed to reopen so I don't know if their was some classification that included titty bars and tattoo shops. I suspect the guy was talking out of his ass and the editor just thought it was a cool quote. I think Azaroth!! Is probably right about the logic of the Top Men in charge.
Except, it's a respiratory disease. It is spread via aerosols, not blood, not fomites, aerosols.
For the sake of public health when dealing with aerosols, you're far more worried about environments with larger numbers of people in an enclosed space for any longer period of time. It's those three things: Viral concentration, Time of exposure, Number of people who can be exposed.
A tattoo parlor where there might be a handful of people in the room, or even just the artist and the customer, for an extended period of time puts one or two people at risk of contagion. This is very much in line with hair salons for the sake of the 'rona.
A titty bar will have scores of people indoors for a long time. restaurant open indoors also has scores of people, or a small church. A concert hundreds or thousands for a couple hours. An office could have dozens for 8 hours at a time. I'm guessing that restaurants and offices have more in common with a titty bar, from a 'rona based public health standpoint, than a tattoo shop.
Treating tattooers differently than restaurateurs, hair salons, or other businesses with greater risk of spread to a large number of people makes no sense in the case of Covid.
We didn't know it was airborne two years ago, so restricting activities that spread blood made sense. Just as I don't have the right to shoot off my gun inside city limits (self defense aside) I don't have the right to spray my, possibly lethal disease containing according to what we knew then, blood around inside city limits either.
They should have fixed it long before now though.
It is spread via aerosols, not blood, not fomites, aerosols
Actually, it is spread by bodily fluids being aerosolized
And tattooing aerosolizes blood.
Sorry, but tattoos are still linked with degeneracy, it is just that so much of our modern society is awash in degeneracy so this is small potatoes.
Also, you got the government and restrictions you wanted so quit whining about them.
Your logic is unassailable.
Lena dunham is neither a celebrity, nor an icon.
No, she is a loudmouthed, ugly, stupid bitch.
Who molested her little sister. And now brags about it.
"Sailors and dogs, keep off the grass"
Thanx for sharing this great post. keep it up.
Because they both have three of the letter T in the them? Face it, neither tattoo parlors nor titty bars are exactly critical infrastructure. I don't know why 'reason' thinks tattoos have some some kind of deep cultural significance when in fact they're just a fad for morons. Put your money into laser skin ablation parlors in about five years.