Artist Ai Weiwei Warns of Chinese and American Authoritarianism
In 1000 Years of Joys and Sorrows, the renowned artist details his struggles with censorship.
HD DownloadOn the morning of April 3, 2011, the renowned artist Ai Weiwei was picked up by Chinese police at an airport in Beijing. Later that day, he found himself in the back of a van surrounded by security officials, wearing a black hood. They drove him to a secret detention facility where he was interrogated and monitored. It was here that Ai began to think of his young son, wondering when he would see him again.
"I was thinking I would be in that position for next 10 or 13 years," Ai told Reason. "And I realized, if there is a chance, I would write down [my memories] so I can pass them to my son."
The resulting book, 1000 Years of Joys and Sorrows, tells the story of his 81-day detention, his repeated struggles with the Chinese Communist Party, and of his father, the famed poet Ai Qing, who was severely punished during China's Cultural Revolution.
"He was heavily punished with about half a million intellectuals," Ai explains. "They relocated us from the capital to the most remote province….That experience gave me an early and very intimate relation to politics."
Growing up in exile, watching his father struggle, profoundly affected Ai's views on human rights, individuality, and freedom of expression. Views that repeatedly put him at odds with Beijing. But, as Ai states in his book, China is not alone in curbing speech.
"Ideological cleansing," he writes, "exists not only under totalitarian regimes—it is also present, in a different form, in liberal Western democracies. Under the influence of politically correct extremism, individual thought and expression are too often curbed and too often replaced by empty political slogans. It is not hard to find examples today of people saying and doing things they don't believe in, simply to fall in line with the prevailing narrative and make a superficial public statement."
Produced by Meredith Bragg
Music: "Jericho at Dusk," by Alon Peretz, via Artlist; "Om Karam," by Yotam Agam, via Artist
Photos: Jin Lei / Xinhua News Agency/Newscom; Michael Melia / Avalon/Newscom; Teresa Nunes/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom; Pedro Fiuza/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom; Aaron Chown/ZUMA Press/Newscom; Beowulf Sheehan/ZUMA Press/Newscom; Stephen Shaver/Ropi/ZUMA Press/Newscom; Britta Pedersen/dpa/picture-alliance/
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"You live in authoritarian state, you just don't know it [yet]."
Does this put him into the "alt right" category, too?
Anything slightly right of extreme far left is alt right.
No. I think his criticisms apply to many in the alt right as well.
"Ideological cleansing," he writes, "exists not only under totalitarian regimes—it is also present, in a different form, in liberal Western democracies. Under the influence of politically correct extremism, individual thought and expression are too often curbed."
This isn't bothsideism. He's not saying Chinese and progressive totalitarianism are equivalent. He's just speaking the truth.
I think he's trying to point out that anti-liberal is bad.
China is totalitarian, and they are doing a hell of a lot here, whether people know it or not. Control of Hollywood is a big deal, at least some folks know they censored movies now. Cowtowing of sports organizations, etc, are obvious examples.
But it is so much more. Subtle manipulation of colleges, for example, from having some students snitching on others so professors won't allow discussion of China to "protect" chinese students.
And, frankly, a lot of social media's horribleness is chinese botnets manipulating it. They have LOTS of people making it look as though public opinion is what they want it to be, and often they just want it to be divisive and illiberal. They're very good at it, and getting better. They do it because propaganda works.
Responding to that shit in an illiberal manner, even if it's shouting down dissenting voices or blocking people for "misinformation", is a dangerous thing.
A warning there is fair.
"Ideological cleansing," he writes, "exists not only under totalitarian regimes—it is also present, in a different form, in liberal Western democracies. Under the influence of politically correct extremism, individual thought and expression are too often curbed and too often replaced by empty political slogans.
Look, we just want Rogan to use his platform responsibly, that's all we're asking.
That alt right bastard. Far right extremist ideologue.
What else is he? Oh, racist, too.
Amazing how so much mainstream media ostensibly doesn't understand the very predictable script of the twitter bots and other social media manipulators in the cancel culture era. Too many inexperienced, young, ideologically driven "journalists" in control of legacy media. Old salts know they're being used, these kids probably think they're running the scam, not being run.
But it's only censorship when the government does it. Private companies throttling speech are muh free markutz, which promote freedom and prosperity for everyone, everywhere, every time.
CRT and anti-racism seem to be taken right from Mao’s cultural revolution playbook.
Ambiguous use of ambiguous terms.
Can someone tell me why we even have relationships with China?