This Texas Town Rejected Stimulus Money to Avoid Vaccine Mandates
"Obviously we could have used the money, but at what cost?,” says Sheila Hemphill, an activist and lobbyist from Brady, Texas
HD DownloadThe American Rescue Plan Act, which was signed by President Joe Biden on March 11, 2021, allocated $19.5 billion in federal aid to municipalities with populations of less than 50,000.
Brady, Texas, population 5,500, was offered $1.3 million. But it turned the money down.
"Obviously we could have used the money, but at what cost?" Brady-based activist and lobbyist Sheila Hemphill told Reason.
Brady was one of at least 243 small towns across the country to reject or return the federal stimulus aid. Residents were concerned that in return for the money, the government would have the right to audit how the funds were used. They were also worried that the money would allow the Biden administration to force the town to comply with its executive order mandating vaccination for all employees at companies with more than 100 workers. Though it was later struck down by the Supreme Court, the order wouldn't have had much of an impact on Brady regardless since its school district is the only organization in town large enough to be impacted.
For the residents of Brady, it was the principle that mattered.
"Today it's about the COVID-19 vaccine mandate. But the big problem is it's an executive order that could be who knows what, because that comes with the stroke of a pen," said Hemphill.
Sixty-seven other Texas towns followed suit. Among them was Mason, which has a population of 2,400 and turned down $570,000.
Sue Pledger, a Mason city commissioner, learned about the potential drawbacks of accepting stimulus money from Hemphill. "The federal government has no right to come in and audit us, has no right to our financial records," she told Reason. "We haven't entered a contract…We're separate, and that's the way we want to keep it here in Mason."
"We had very strong support in a very short time that we had made the right choice, based on what representing the citizens in this community meant. It meant giving back the funds, staying sovereign, keeping our independence, not giving the federal government a foot in our finances, or over what we do with our contracts."
Mike Maharrey, the national director of communications for The Tenth Amendment Center, says that the government has a long track record of using federal money to extend its control over states. The Anti-Commandeering Doctrine gives Brady the right to refuse to enforce executive orders, but the stimulus funding gives the federal government the power to say if you don't "'enforce these various mandates and regulations…we can take the money back,'" Maharrey told Reason.
Nationwide, the share of each state's total revenue contributed by the federal government ranges from nearly half to a quarter, and that money generally comes with conditions.
"Bribery is a very good term for what the federal government is doing," says Maharrey. "The only way that you can avoid the consequences of being bribed is to not take the bribe."
He adds: "In a lot of cases you don't know specifically what those strings are going to be because the federal government writes these contracts or agreements in such a way as to give the federal government a great deal of latitude to kind of retroactively fit in what policies they want in place."
Maharrey says a system that gives power to local governments is the better of two evils. "I'm not somebody who's all for decentralization because I think state and local governments are somehow better. They're just as bad as the federal government. But as with any system, a decentralized system is going to be better for the individual than a monopoly system…I'd rather deal with 50 different states than have everything, one-size-fits-all, emanating from the federal government."
Produced and edited by John Osterhoudt, camera by Osterhoudt and Zach Weissmueller, additional graphics by Isaac Reese
Photos: Abaca Press/Gripas Yuri/Abaca/Sipa USA/Newscom; Earl S. Cryer/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom; MEGA/Newscom; Coolcaesar/CC BY-SA 3.0/Wikimedia Commons
Videos: Brady Chamber of Commerce; City of Brady; Kelly L from Pexels.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
That money would have been a shot in their arm.
accepting the money would be a Brady violation.
Earn income while simply working online. work from home whenever you want. just for maximum 5 hours a day you can make more than $600 per day online. (re12) From this i made $18000 last month in my spare time.
Check info here:- ==>> http://moneystar33.blogspot.com/
It does appear to have failed to produce immunity but certainly stimulated a response to a specific disease.
and more.. Video: Graphene Oxide: A Toxic Substance in the Vial of the COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine? By Ricardo Delgado and Prof Michel Chossudovsky Global Research, January 19, 2022.
Videos. Experimental Injections. ''Biggest Crimes Against Humanity Ever Committed.'' Anna de Buisseret Explains Who Will Be Held Liable. Under The Law. By Anna Buissseret. January 08. 2022.
Video: Reiner Füellmich and 50 Lawyers: “Different Batches” and “Lethal Doses”, ”The Vaccines Are Designed to Kill”
Global Research Newsletter 24.01.22 Dangerous and Deadly: Over 1000 Scientific Studies Referencing Injuries and Deaths from COVID Vaccines. Vasko Kohlmayer
I make 85 dollars each hour for working an online job at home. KLA02 I never thought I could do it but my best friend makes 10000 bucks every month working this job and she recommended me to learn more about it. The potential with this is endless.
For more detail …. http://rb.gy/u603ti
The founders thought of this when they said that any federal income tax must be returned to the states based upon population. So the government passed the 16A which opened the door to returning money to the states on the condition that the states pass laws that are beyond the defined powers of the federal government. Like drinking age, speed limits, mask mandates, etc..
Yes, great idea. You reject money to avoid a vaccine mandate that does not exist. Own the libs no matter what the cost.
Americans want democrats out of their lives.
Your reading comprehension leaves a lot to be desired. Try again. Maybe after reading more than just the headline.
But it did happen. SCOTUS had to overturn the illegal order.
It did not apply to them anyhow.
the government would have the right to audit how the funds were used
A federal audit is a 'get-into-jail-free' card.
And whether the mandate gets enforced or not, it in no way invalidates the government auditing local finances.
Apparently, "refusing to accept 'free shit'" = "pwning libs".
Funny that they don't seem to realize that the locals have recognized their schtick and, rather than quietly slinking out of town rather than being strung up as a carpetbagger, are insisting they have a right to spend their $ to influence local policy.
""Obviously we could have used the money, but at what cost?" Brady-based activist and lobbyist Sheila Hemphill told Reason..."
Well, your ability to walk down the street without a napkin over half your face, your ability to enter a store ditto, your ability to enter a restaurant without having to show your papers...
Just minor things like most of your freedoms, that's all that costs.
The mouse is starting to suspect the cheese might not be free.
while others have run around shouting " ITS A TRAP!!!-"
If you are on the Left, and don't like these over-reaches of power, you have only yourself to blame. A majority of Republicans want these mandates to end. A majority of Independents want these mandates to end. Only a majority of Democrats wants this to continue.
That majority of Democrats isn't going to listen to someone labeled Anti-vaxxer or White Supremacist or Trumper. They MIGHT listen to one of their fellow liberal friends. Maybe. But until you step up and tell them you'd rather be in agreement with a Trumper than allow these abuses to continue, these abuses will continue.
So it is time for all of you principled left-leaning lovers of freedom to decide that checking the power of your team is more important than signaling that you aren't on other teams. For some reason, I just don't see that happening. Hope springs eternal, though.
"Obviously we could have used the money, but at what cost?,”
Uhh, at the cost of not infecting the vaccinated!
U r but a clown show..., with a minor in pure wanted ignorance.
The Phucko Knows
anti semite says what?
This feels like taxation without representation.
Mike will be by shortly to discuss how Texas is exactly equally bad as an given number of blue states.
The town I live in couldn't whore itself out fast enough to get all the Bidenbucks it could!
Texas is killing it's own citizens.
Global IQ increases with every death.
The world is laughing at Clown Car America.
I'm actually laughing every time I think about defeated, spineless, boot-licking Europeans and Australians and find news stories about their disarmed impotence very entertaining.
Like the Rats of NIMH, we've learned to read the instruction on our cage locks . . .
Here’s a radical idea. Instead of sending money to DC just to have them return it to the states minus their ‘cut’ and with conditions, just keep all the money in the state without the conditions. Just saying.