Squid Game Says More About Communism Than Capitalism
The breakout Netflix series contains critiques of a decidedly "anti-capitalist" political and economic system that's haunted the Korean Peninsula.
HD DownloadSquid Game, the breakout Korean series about players competing to the death for a giant piggy bank full of cash, is Netflix's biggest series launch, and co-CEO Ted Sarandos says "there's a very good chance it will be our biggest show ever."
Critics have argued that the show offers a devastating critique of contemporary capitalism.
In a Jacobin review headlined, "Squid Game Is An Allegory of Capitalist Hell," the writer asserts that "Korea's extreme inequality is Squid Game's central theme." New York Times reporter Jin Yu Young wrote that "it has…tapped a sense familiar to people in the United States…that prosperity in nominally rich countries has become increasingly difficult to achieve, as wealth disparities widen and home prices rise past affordable levels."
The show's creator Hwang Dong-hyuk told Variety that he "wanted to write a story that was an allegory or fable about modern capitalist society, something that depicts an extreme competition, somewhat like the extreme competition of life."
"Is there a theme more unifying in global pop culture than 'capitalism is bad?'" asks Vulture writer Roxana Hadadi in her recap of one episode before continuing, "It helps that the statement is true, of course…"
But Squid Game has a much richer and more resonant takeaway than "capitalism is bad."
(Warning: This article and video contain spoilers.)
The series hints at a different message when Front Man, the Darth Vader–esque manager of the dangerous and lucrative series of competitions, chastises an employee who violated the rules. "You've ruined the most crucial element of this place: equality," he says.
Later, players are invited to witness the mass execution of those who violated the "pure ideology" of this insulated world when they participated in an organ harvesting scheme for personal enrichment, with the emphasis on the enrichment as the heart of the crime. Throughout the games, the faceless pink-uniformed workers are all masked with only symbols distinguishing their ranks in the collective's hierarchy. Meanwhile, the elites sit cloistered together, observing the spectacle from above.
Does this all sound like a reference to capitalism or a different economic system—the one that's actually haunted the Korean Peninsula?
One participant in the games is North Korean escapee Kang Sae-byeok, who's accepted the deadly consequences and poor odds in the long-shot hope of winning money to bring the rest of her family across the border after a sleazy smuggler ripped her off.
Are organ brokers and border coyotes examples of capitalism? They're black markets of the sort that crop up when voluntary trade is prohibited. More than 1,000 people a year risk their lives trying to escape the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, and the majority of successful escapees settle in the South, according to the charity Connect North Korea.
Another character, Pakistani Ali Abdul, also finds himself in dire straits because of exploitation from a boss leveraging his immigration status against him. In other words, the consequences of a gray labor market emerging in response to state-imposed border control.
What about the main character, Seong Gi-Hun? He's an unemployed gambling addict in trouble with loan sharks, drawn into the game because he wants to make enough money to prevent his ex-wife from moving his daughter abroad with her new husband. We later learn that his life troubles began after a strike at the car factory where he worked killed a colleague and caused Gi-Hun to miss his daughter's birth.
His story is based on the real-life 2009 Ssangyong Motor strike that ended in a militarized raid by Korean riot police.
This might sound like a critique of modern capitalism, but in the real-life strike, Ssangyong Motor had been taken over by Shanghai Automotive Industry Corporation three years earlier—a Chinese state-owned operation, which was responsible for the crackdown on workers.
So was free market capitalism to blame?
A key to understanding Squid Game's deeper meaning is the distinctive wardrobe, and in particular, the green tracksuits that the contestants are required to wear. The show's art director told The New York Times that they're a reference to the green uniforms of the Saemaul Undong, or New Village Movement, a state-led industrialization program. This was government industrial policy—i.e., centralized planning—and, like China's Cultural Revolution under Mao's communist regime, involved stripping communities of their local customs and identities through a program known as misin tapa undong, or "movement to overthrow the worship of gods."
There are some obvious symbols of capitalist excess in the show, like the crass, golden-masked Westerners who watch the proceedings from a luxury box while placing bets on the desperate contestants as if they're the very racehorses our protagonist lost all his money on. Or the arrogant and broke former financial adviser who believes that everyone gets what they deserve.
And, of course, there's that giant piggy bank near the ceiling filling up with bundles of cash every time someone is eliminated from the competition.
South Korea is an unqualified capitalist success story. Unlike its communist neighbor to the north, "the miracle on the river Han" experienced massive economic growth from the 1960s on largely thanks to market reforms, and growth that raised the standard of living for the rich, middle class, and poor at a rate that far exceeded that of its neighbors. Today, the country has the 37th-highest GDP per capita in the world and ranks 26th in the Fraser Institute's Human Freedom Index.
South Korea's approach was far from perfect, and persistent government meddling in the economy accounts for many of the country's problems. Housing prices have skyrocketed as South Korea's idiosyncratic land-use regulatory regime has encouraged rampant real estate speculation. And its loose monetary policy fueled troublingly high levels of personal debt and price inflation—trends that have accelerated in the COVID era.
All of these are serious problems facing South Korea, and many advanced economies worldwide. Its citizens are putting more money into cryptocurrencies like bitcoin, which The New York Times characterizes as emblematic of the "get rich quickly" culture of South Korea but could also be the result of a crisis of confidence in centralized banking and the legacy financial system represented by the main character's bottomed-out hotshot financial adviser friend.
Maybe the reason for Squid Game's global resonance isn't its leftist critique of capitalism—a Hollywood cliché—but that it taps into something more fundamental and universal: a growing unease with systems of centralized surveillance and control. At its core, this is what the game is all about.
A central horror of Squid Game is that participation is voluntary—to a degree. Participants sign away their lives and their rights, which can only be regained with a majority vote. This conceit, too, misunderstands the nature of capitalism and contracts. In a truly free society, you always have the right of exit. Instead, the game's structure is more reminiscent of social contract theory, which is regularly employed to justify gross governmental violations of rights so long as those carrying them out are appointed through an ostensibly democratic process.
Squid Game is not about voluntarism, but force, deception, and coercion. It's not about free markets and choice, but dehumanization and forced assimilation into a collective.
As the show's star, Lee Jung-jae, told The New York Times: "It's about people. I think we pose questions to ourselves as we watch the show: Have I been forgetting anything that I should never lose sight of, as a human being?"
And, in the end, our hero regains his personal agency at the last possible moment and decides not to play any longer, even with victory assured. He leaves battered and traumatized, but with his soul intact.
Squid Game isn't really about capitalism, properly understood. It's about developing strategies for undermining and resisting authoritarian control and retaining your humanity under a system designed to strip it all away.
Produced by Zach Weissmueller; graphics by Calvin Tran
Photo credits: Dong-Min Jang/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom; Wang Yiliang / Xinhua News Agency/Newscom; Rod Lamkey - CNP/Sipa USA/Newscom
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
If you want to find casual sex contacts with fine shemales in France check out our web platform Transexuelles Lille
Stunning and brave!
I am making $165 an hour working from home. i was greatly surprised at the same time as my neighbour advised me she changed into averaging $ninety five however I see the way it works now. I experience masses freedom now that i'm my non-public boss.
that is what I do...... Visit Here
Any underage trannies?
It is a fucking tv show. Turn it off. Go out into the real world and do something. Ffs.
Calm down. People do. Yesterday, I sat on a park bench and scrolled Insta and Tik Tok.
Yesterday, I sat on a park bench
And eyed little girls with bad intent.
greasy fingers smearing shabby clothes.
No, those little girls were well-dressed.
Just what were the little girls intending?
While I agree, it is important to point this shit out. Over a hundred million people watched this stuff and a significant number think that its over contrived plot devices and hackneyed symbolism are actually a commentary on true capitalism.
It is definitely worthwhile to spend time showing how these "takedowns" of capitalism are actually taking down nothing of the sort, but rather setting up strawmen effigies of capitalism to set ablaze on their own convoluted terms.
a significant number think that its over contrived plot devices and hackneyed symbolism are actually a commentary on true capitalism
Maybe, but I don't think most people really dive that 'deeply' into it. I watched the whole thing with my 14-year-old and it was just a sci-fi suspense thing with a loosely tacked-on comment about money lending in the last episode (it's bad that people can get rich making predatory loans).
But this 'moral' is tacked on so artificially that I can tell you it meant exactly nothing to my 14-year-old - what she saw was the struggle against authoritarianism, and she definitely caught the anti-Communist stuff (which is unavoidable and in your face, because it's real in Korea) much more than the 'critique of Capitalism' that's grafted on at the end.
I don't think either assessment is mutually exclusive. Both my 12 and 14 yr. old had carved through serious holes in the plot ("He murdered that guy in broad daylight, so why exactly are they waiting until night to get attacked in groups?") and any anti-authoritarian messaging was diffused between the authoritarians in the movie and the authoritarians building straw men and setting them on fire as some sort of moral lesson. Building authoritarian characters using rhetoric and tearing them down doesn't confer moral superiority on your rhetoric.
My 15 year old caught a lot of the tropes because they are the tropes they are fed daily in the CA school system. While you saw the anti-authoritarian messages as warnings against what the communists did, she saw it as reminiscent of the stories of what "capitalism" unleashed on the native american tribes.
"Building authoritarian characters using rhetoric and tearing them down doesn't confer moral superiority on your rhetoric."
Yeah that was the point I was making below. When you have such a flawed view of the real world, your attempt to analogize it will not be successful. That is why I really wonder if what we see as anti-communist messages are earnestly held beliefs of the writer(s) that these are capitalist tendencies.
I think this line from the article encapsulates it nicely: "The show's creator Hwang Dong-hyuk told Variety that he "wanted to write a story that was an allegory or fable about modern capitalist society, something that depicts an extreme competition, somewhat like the extreme competition of life.""
It's important to remember that, for ideological leftists, any sort of dedicated competition is absolute poison, because they are chronically addicted to the impossibility of bringing about absolute equality of outcome in all things for all people. That's why leftist regimes tend to become authoritarian, anarcho-tyrannic shitholes, as the leftists try increasingly desperate, heavy-handed measures to bring about the outcomes they want but reality refuses to provide them.
It's also why the ultimate end-goal of society for these kinds of people is the Peter Gibbons ideal--"I'd relax, I would sit on my ass all day, I would do nothing." Even his redneck neighbor knows how stupid this sounds--"Shit, you don't need a million dollars to do nothing, man. Look at my cousin. He's broke, and he don't do shit."--and in the end, Peter winds up in a blue-collar construction job with the same redneck neighbor, because being a wealthy layabout ultimately doesn't provide people with any kind of emotional or spiritual fulfillment, a lesson the neo-Marxists have been struggling against for over 50 years now.
That is why I really wonder if what we see as anti-communist messages are earnestly held beliefs of the writer(s) that these are capitalist tendencies.
I'd wager he sees himself as a centrist and his point as being "look - extremes of Capitalism are just as bad as extremes of Communism," although he pretty much has to imagine a Communist society and pretend that it's Capitalist in order to do it.
Both my 12 and 14 yr. old had carved through serious holes in the plot ("He murdered that guy in broad daylight, so why exactly are they waiting until night to get attacked in groups?")
And you certainly didn't want to think too hard about any aspect of the cop storyline. I put it somewhere between Bond movies and Lost on the 'please just eat your popcorn and stop thinking too hard about this' scale.
Building authoritarian characters using rhetoric and tearing them down doesn't confer moral superiority on your rhetoric.
No, and while I think the guy does a decent job of constructing characters and having them interact, his 'social vision' is completely incoherent and any pretense to a morally superior view on 'capitalism' is pretty laughable.
There a 'return-of-the-repressed' aspect to some unguarded moments, however, like the way the game managers keep commenting that they want to make sure things are 'fair and equal' the they aren't 'out there,' and the faux-democratic processes pasted onto the fundamentally totalitarian construct of the whole thing is a pretty direct indictment of the Communist attitude, whether its intended as a critique of 'capitalism' or not.
This is why it feels so incredibly false when they let the news report play in the background of the finale with the handwringing about how the government isn't regulating lenders hard enough.
We just now got finished watching this whole thing happening with hundreds of people dying and the government not even knowing about it. Millions of dollars are changing hands in a totally black market, and the moral of the story is "needs moar government regulation."
It's like reading a whole Howard Zinn book about how evil and awful the government is and finding him concluding that the problem is that the government isn't powerful enough.
"While I agree, it is important to point this shit out. Over a hundred million people watched this stuff and a significant number think that its over contrived plot devices and hackneyed symbolism are actually a commentary on true capitalism..."
So do those who watch "A Christmas Carol", and not a damn thing can be done about it.
Where true capitalism is represented by men with service pistols banning plant leaves and nationalizing property via asset forfeiture for Jesus?
There is one reason to watch TV: Sports, where you count the score or the lap times, not the "judges" opinions.
All else is pablum, especially the "news".
I couldn’t get into the Squid Game.
The gambling addict’s problem isn’t capitalism. The problem is he played a random claw grab game at an arcade to play Russian roulette with his daughter’s birthday present.
Why not write her a letter, or a poem telling her how much she means to you on her special day? It’s a lot more meaningful, and practically free.
No, the main character has to play a cutthroat game of capitalism in order to buy his family’s love.
Obviously, he can’t just be wise.
yes, that claw thing was so aggravating
All I can see is the lack of representation in this series.
Squid Game isn't really about capitalism, properly understood. It's about developing strategies for undermining and resisting authoritarian control and retaining your humanity under a system designed to strip it all away.
FYI, that's how the Marxist left perceives capitalism.
Because capitalism is a mirror. The Marist left looks at it and sees themselves.
You bet.
And of course, when they want to list examples of prosperous socialism, they list countries that are not socialist at all.
I watched a bit of Squid Game, and it wasn't so bad if you turn off the logical part of your brain.
It is always amusing to me when people act like it is some great feat to stick it to the man in some anti-cap passion play. But to me, it is like praising a kid for building a lego model and smashing it. There is nothing particularly clever about creating a caricature of something you don't well understand and then mocking it.
And, frankly, that is what happened in Squid Game. The creator doesn't really understand what power structures are created by capitalism and which are created by the elites who regularly tilt the scales in non-capitalist ways. And since he does not understand these mechanisms, he makes a bunch of confused mistakes, just as Mr WEISSMUELLER calls out above.
As Weissmueller noted, the way to criticise Microcosms in literature is to point out exactly how sloppy and off base the author was when they created that metaphorical microcosm. That doesn't mean you cannot still appreciate the story despite its flaws.
I enjoyed it to an extent but I suspect for the same reason most people did, the ultra-violence juxtaposed against children's games and the set/costume design. The story was rather blah and I don't think I'll be watching the 2nd season. Shutting off your brain was definitely needed.
Yeah, it was all right as a one-off, but the character--and to a certain extent, the creator--shows just how flawed he is at the end by not getting on the plane to go see his daughter, who just wants to spend time with her dad.
There's an unintended, yet eloquent indictment of the political left in that scene, as it shows how they consistently put their ideological crusades above the things that provide real personal meaning to one's life, such as familial relationships, and think they're noble heroes for doing so rather than self-aggrandizing, self-absorbed narcissists. That certainly wasn't what the director intended, but that's how it comes across.
Ultimately, the main character is really just a selfish, self-indulgent asshole, and no amount of simping for the supposedly oppressed will ever change that.
great take, saved me trying to write the same thing
but the character--and to a certain extent, the creator--shows just how flawed he is at the end by not getting on the plane to go see his daughter, who just wants to spend time with her dad
This was actually my daughter's takeaway. I think she missed the message about usury completely and saw it as Gi Hun's failure to learn anything from his experiences. He started out stupid about money (but greedy and selfish) and ended up stupid about money (but greedy and selfish).
The fact that he dumps his entire stash into a savings account and ignores it, and refuses to listen to the bank manager who begs him to invest it, instead going on a year-long drinking binge on top of the lecture from the game's mastermind about how you have to make money in order to lend money, and 'making money is not all that easy,' the show's actual message is not what its creator thinks it is.
As such I think the creator's main moral blind spot is that he doesn't see any of the contestants as having any culpability for any of their debt. If no one had ever come along and offered to loan them money, then they would be just fine.
And these people exist in the real world, hence the push from the organs of the Left like the ACLU for student loan debt forgiveness.
So Jesus' religious conservatives are the genuine altruists?
The irony is that you can get a great idea of how sadistic Pacific Rim Asians are to each other just by watching Japanese game shows.
And here I thought it was a critique on The Lord of the Rings nuclear allegory. No, that isn't right. Maybe is was about an anti anti-communist critique of Wrinkle In Time. Or maybe it just wanted us to kill John Lennon.
Jesus Christ people, why does everything have to have deeper meaning? It was a mediocre TV show with a horrendous ending (everything after "1 Year Later" should have been cut), and not even the best Korean deadly game show style TV series on Netflix (that would be (that would be Alice in Borderland).
Jesus Christ people, why does everything have to have deeper meaning?
Squid Game was in no way subtle about its 'deeper meaning,' but Tolkien was clear that LOTR was not an allegory about the A-bomb.
but Tolkien was clear that LOTR was not an allegory about the A-bomb.
Indeed. And even knowing that he vociferously denied any allegory in his story, people continued to insist it was there, but Tolkien was "playing a trick on us".
Jesus Christ people, why does everything have to have deeper meaning? It was a mediocre TV show with a horrendous ending (everything after "1 Year Later" should have been cut), and not even the best Korean deadly game show style TV series on Netflix (that would be (that would be Alice in Borderland).
Especially given the almost minute-by-minute 'lost in translation' moments in every episode. "The circle. It reminds me of the moon where I'm from." Earth?
Seriously, my 14 yr. old had realized the people were idiots for staking their lives for a sum of money that they didn't know would solve their problems by the end of the first episode and had thoroughly hacked the game a couple of different ways by the 3rd episode. If your cover story can't compete with Santa Claus, how meaningful can your deeper narrative be?
A couple of questions about the show - were Netflix and the South Korean production company and all the actors and the crew being paid to put this show out? And if so, were they all paid equal amounts? Was it a "fair" amount or as much as they could get? Is anybody getting rich off this thing? If the show had bombed and lost money, would all these various people have shared equally in the loss or would the actors and the crew and all the people connected with putting the show on the air still have been paid while the Netflix corporation and the production company stockholders bit the big one?
so don't waste my time?
As Overt said, it's OK if you know going in that it's a 'brain off' proposition. Anyone suggesting it's a 'brain on' thinkpiece or social critique should be pointed to the very obvious plot holes and the likely depth of thought of or penetration of narrative on people who need a "Don't torture people for money." moral lesson.
cool gracias. my brain-off show right now is Bosch I waited until there were seven seasons to watch lol
The thing I like to (try to) keep in mind about Netflix is, for all of the inspired think pieces they may carry or produce, none come even remotely close to the popularity of CoComelon.
I watched Squid Game. I thought it was a pretty poor effort at any sort of serious commentary on Capitalism. The people who volunteered to play were generally gamblers, drug dealers/addicts/whores, etc. And the ending sucked. (Spolier Alert) Go see your daughter, ya dumbfuck! I figure most people just watched it to see the different ways people would get killed in the games.
But this does bring to mind the Netflix movie Platform, which was supposed to be a critique of capitalism but which I thought perfectly depicted Communism. If you haven't seen it, it's a scifi flick about a vertical prison with one cell per level. Two people per cell. A food platform moves from the top level to the bottom stopping at each level for two minutes. At the top are the people who run the place, the rich and powerful (or the fortunate). At the bottom are the worst (or most unfortunate). There was something something about how the people could move up levels based on something or other and they were always trying to move up to the top and hopefully out.
The chefs on the top level fill the platform with piles and piles of food. The top level gets first pickings, and as it moves down the selfish and greedy people try to take as much as they can and there is less and less to pick from until there's nothing at the bottom, except perhaps for excrement and puke. This is actually Communism in a nutshell. There is only a set amount of food (wealth) and it is distributed by a higher power from the top down. There is no wealth generation. There is no expansion of wealth. There is no free association and trade. Just top/down managed distribution of resources. The Commissars get the cream while the proles get the shit.
And everyone is forced to live in some Brutalist atrocity because it's more "efficient" (or "sustainable" in modern parlance).
For example, I'm no fan of how housing prices have gone through the roof nearly everywhere the last 5-10 years, but even I realize that this is a supply-and-demand issue tied to larger public policies like encouraging mass immigration, extreme liquidity via rock-bottom ZIRP rates, and poor residential development planning. The last thing anyone should want is the horrifically dystopian pod existence that the World Economic Forum keeps pushing for.
The last thing anyone should want is the horrifically dystopian pod existence that the World Economic Forum keeps pushing for.
But it keeps the peasants from dirtying the world up!
Who gives a flying FUCK what a media outlet named after mass murder, the reign of terror , in the French Revolution thinks about fictional murder.
"Is there a theme more unifying in global pop culture than 'capitalism is bad?'" asks Vulture writer Roxana Hadadi in her recap of one episode before continuing, "It helps that the statement is true, of course…"
As she watched the privately produced show on her 55 inch flat screen TV that was made in Japan, with the show streaming from one of several competing streaming services....
"I just watched a show where people get tortured and killed for money. It taught a very valuable lesson that I think everyone should learn: Capitalism is evil unless I'm the one making money."
Bernie’s motto:
“Go after the millonahhhs”.
Bernie becomes a multi millionaire
“Go after the billionahhhs”
Good point.
Perhaps we’ve had it so good, for so long, that many of us feel that “income inequality” is actually as bad as real poverty; bone crushing, cold in the winter, going to sleep hungry kind of poverty.
The entertainment industry hive-mind certainly seems to believe this. Those of us who have experienced it ourselves, or have had the privilege to be raised around family that knew what real poverty was all about, should certainly know better than to buy this bullshit.
What could be more laughable than a Vulture “writer” complaining about capitalism? Of course, these types always figure that in worker’s paradise they’ll be poets of the people, continuing on with their bullshit, and not the ones that Central Planning decides to place in work camps.
"As she watched the privately produced show on her 55 inch flat screen TV that was made in Japan, with the show streaming from one of several competing streaming services...."
Ask her if it could have been made in NK or Cuba. Capitalism exists quite well without communism; communism cannot exist without capitalism.
It's like everything else. People will read into it what they wish. It amazed me how many people told me I might as well be blind if I saw the underpinnings of a Socialist utopia in The Handmaid's Tale. I said I'm sorry if they couldn't see the ideal of "from each according to their ability, to each according to their need", but it's definitely there in the main theme.
Didn't Atwood confirm that she based the story in Handmaid's off of what she thought life under the Iranian mullahs was like?
And poor Fred mentions in season four that Gillead is a successful economy with the highest birth rates in the world. Reminds me of the… But California, but California… on economic growth (never mentioning 1/3 of federal transfers, crime, etc).
Not only that, the commanders are the ruling political class. The infertile mass populations reside in the colonies.
Agreed with all of this, but the bigger and more confusing point is: this show sucked hairy arse, so why is anyone watching it or talking about it???
I watched it because my wife wanted to watch it, but if I had been on my own, I would have turned if off halfway through the first episode, and then *many* times after that... not because of its message, but just because it was mindnumbingly stupid, poorly directed and acted, the dialog was awful and incredibly plodding...
If there was a worse scene in any TV or movie in the last ten years than those involving the "elites" that were the customers of the Squid Game, I'll eat my shoes... You want to talk about cultural stereotypes, go and watch how this show portrays westerners, all dumb as fuck, evil to the core, and homosexual rapists to boot.
Why oh why is anyone talking about this??
"...watch how this show portrays westerners, all dumb as fuck, evil to the core, and homosexual rapists to boot."
OK, so not ALL, but most. LOL
So that's what Let's Go Brandon is about?
LOL, OK so Reason, a decidedly anti-socialist and rabidly anti-communist publication feels the need to tell us that an obvious critique of (financialized) capitalism from a country where they know a thing or two about it is *really* a critique of communism. LOL again.
Financialized. Capitalism.
Capitalism. Financialized.
Until now, when I saw Squid Game referenced a lot, I assumed it was an actual game show.
Me, too.
'Squid Game' Smuggler In North Korea Faces Death Penalty, Set To Be Shot By Firing Squad After 7 Students Get Arrested For Watching Netflix Show
https://www.newsbreak.com/n/0d6oa7NZ?pd=05vSRvT0&lang=en_US&s=i16
"...In a Jacobin review..."
Stop right there. May as well ask Tony regarding natural rights.
I wonder if the Girondin has done a review yet?
I saw Squid Games as an allegory on the impossible task of getting ahead in the communist Biden economy with its crippling 4% annualized inflation. Everyone in California must at least now be roving the desert landscape in search of food and petrol. Well, hey, fuck you California. You had your chance when you could have elected my fellow Black conservative, Larry Elder. Your loss. Now you’re stuck with super-commie, Gavin Fucking Newsom— who has literally torn the California economy apart.
Myself? Yeah, you could say I’ve seen things. Terrible things. Tonight while I was Searching for 65% cocoa chocolate chips I had to settle for milk chocolate chips instead. Yet another example of how things were better in the Trump administration and how things have deteriorated to where we are at now with 4% unemployment and inflation at historical averages. Bleach… scary times. Fuck Joe Biden!
Fuck off and die, shitbag.
Later, players are invited to witness the mass execution of those who violated the "pure ideology" of this insulated world when they participated in an organ harvesting scheme for personal enrichment, with the emphasis on the enrichment as the heart of the crime.
So, you didn't actually watch the show?
The player's witnessed the mass execution of the organ harvesters, not because the organ harvesters were enriching themselves, but because they involved a player in their scheme and gave him unfair advantage by telling him about the puzzles in advance. They (the organ harvesters) were clearly told that the organ harvesting was otherwise totally fine.
It says more about human nature greedily choosing to take sides against rational behaviour.
Nicaragua has again gone communist. Expect mass migration of sensitive, concerned and aware Antifans to go show them how to loot stores. None of this would be possible without mystical conservatives sending DEA agents to Monroe Doctrine ghettos to blast them away from bad plant leaves and back into the arms of the tobacco, distilling and televangelism rackets. There is something about the initiation of force that simply begs for reprisals.
Korea's extreme inequality is Squid Game's central theme.
It's weird that so few South Koreans are interested in migrating to the peoples' paradise of North Korea.
The movie has the most absurd capitalist stereotypes ever put on film. It's so obviously about capitalism a five year-old could see that. You can stretch, but you can't stretch this hard, or you're going to break yourself.
South Korea (and much of Asia, really) is an oligarchy. The economy is controlled by a few conglomerates who often operate at a family level. America is certainly not immune from this, but family connections, marriage to a right "clan" and a college degree determines your future WAY more there.
The "anti capitalism" messaging in movies like this is actually Korean directors tapping into the nation's eternal bitching and discontent against the wealthy class. Not only do the middle class there have limited options of upward mobility, they also have to live in a tiny land populated by pushy, judgmental people. Men there have to enroll in military service. Students spend 8-10 hours in school. Their homes are high rise apartments, not suburban existence with a front yard and a dog.
Much of that is the legacy of old feudalism still in effect. Korea is an old ass country, and much of their people were trapped in caste system for most of its existence. Koreans effectively love capitalism, because they're trend driven people obsessed with materialism. They just detest the "tale of two cities" life created by protectionism and red tape they often vote for.