Biden Won't End the Warfare-Surveillance State
National security reporter Spencer Ackerman on 9/11, mass surveillance at home, and failed wars abroad.
HD DownloadIn the wake of the 9/11 attacks, the United States invaded and occupied two countries, bombed four others, helped create 21 million refugees and cause over 800,000 deaths, and spent over $6 trillion on combat and anti-terrorism measures. Republican and Democratic presidents and congressional leaders authorized sweeping new initiatives that effectively put all American citizens under surveillance.
Even as the United States has left Afghanistan, ending our longest war, many of the programs and mindsets born out of events 20 years ago are still firmly in place. In Reign of Terror, national security reporter Spencer Ackerman argues that the war on terror also profoundly destabilized American politics and helped to produce the Donald Trump presidency by stoking fears of a racialized Other. "The longer America viewed itself as under siege," he writes, "the easier it became to see enemies everywhere."
He talks with Reason's Nick Gillespie about how a coalition of libertarians and progressives can work to stop ongoing government surveillance and military interventionism underwritten by overwrought fears of Islamic terrorism.
Edited by Ian Keyser. Intro by Paul Detrick. Interview by Nick Gillespie.
Photos: Randy Taylor/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom, GORAN TOMASEVIC/REUTERS/Newscom
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
no shit
Start making money this time… Spend more time with your family & relatives by doing jobs that only require you to have a computer and an internet access and you can have that at your home.AFj Start bringing up to $65,000 to $70,000 a month. I’ve started this job and earn a handsome income and now I am exchanging it with you, so you can do it too.
Here is I started.…………… VISIT HERE
Seriously I don’t know why more people haven’t tried this, I work two shifts, 2 hours in the day and 2 in the evening…wrh And i get surly a check of $12600 what’s awesome is I m working from home so I get more time with my kids.
Try it, you won’t regret it........CASHAPP NOW
This year do not worry about money you can start a new Business and do an online job I have started a new Business and I am making over $84, 8254 per month I was started with 25 persons company now I have make a company of 200 peoples you can start a Business GTb with a company of 10 to 50 peoples or join an online job.
Join this right now............... VISIT HERE
This year do not worry about money you can start a new Business and do an online job I have started a new Business and I am making over $84, 8254 per month I was started with 25 persons company AFt now I have make a company of 200 peoples you can start a Business with a company of 10 to 50 peoples or join an online job.
For more info Open on this web Site............E-CASH
Biden probably can't end it.
Look at what they did to Trump. You think it would be any different for Biden if he went against the FBI and the CIA, etc?
I can never quite put to bed the feeling that JFK was an inside job.
Why? By all accounts, JFK was absolutely a craven tool to the state. Don't believe Oliver Stone's nonsense about JFK vs the Military Industrial State- JFK Loved the idea of Vietnam because it gave him a chance to act tough and bypass the catastrophe of the Bay of Pigs debacle.
Find USA Online Jobs (800$-95000$ Weekly) safe and secure! Easy Access To Information. Simple in use. All the Answers. Multiple sources combined.HGl Fast and trusted. Discover us now! Easy & Fast, 99% Match......
Start now................ VISIT HERE
He shares much of the blame. But If I remember correctly, Shortly before he was assassinated he did an interview expressing doubts about the escalation in Vietnam.
Could just be public posturing, or maybe there was some infighting afoot.
You didn't get Trump because of racism or "the other" that is complete bullshit. Many voters are in the GOP and vote the party ticket, others liked his America First platform (meaning jobs and manufacturing) and had been Perot voters year before, finally some were former Obama voters upset that the democrats had forgotten laborers and had embraced the security state and endless warfare.
The notion of Trump as racist is purely the result of the Clinton campaign turning their very powerful persuasion techniques on the public, and the IC and FBI using their neocon powers of surveillance. Sadly the libertarians bought into it.
He announced his candidacy by going on a rant about Mexicans. And you all let him off the hook because he added one CYA clause of "...some of them, I assume, are good people."
Then you have the endorsement (accepted or not) of virtually every notable racist organization leader out there. Yeah, I think we can surmise that Trump was the go to vote for racists.
Not saying all Trump voters are rabid racists, but most racist were Trump voters (if they vote at all).
Trump voters are advocates of CRT, race essentialism, and the notion that blacks can't obtain an ID or succeed without extra help?
You're projecting again.
but most racist were Trump voters
Ibrahm X Kendi and Robin DiAngelo even had Trump stickers on their cars.
Everybody's got to favor somebody. Who would they have voted for if Trump weren't running?
What an asshole.
>>helped to produce the Donald Trump presidency
waaaah. if Ackerman is leading with that why bother?
I see no mention of wokism amok. Far as I can tell from friends, that is the primary reason for Trump's rise. People STILL can't understand that he was elected for the simple fact of not being a typical pandering politician, and for not being afraid to call out wokists for the idiots they are.
Multiplying Genders Led to Trump.
I'd read that article.
Cancel culture, fake rape stories, everything which was politically correct and is now woke. It's a large fertile field.
"Bitter clingers," "basket of deplorables," white privilege, economic "recovery" that somehow missed the entire middle of the country...
dude you're spot on.
Of course he won't end it. We will not be permitted to elect a president who will threaten the power elite's oligarchy.
He talks with Reason's Nick Gillespie about how a coalition of libertarians and progressives can work to stop ongoing government surveillance
Proggies want to control every facet of life. They don't want to end surveillance. And I'm assuming he's not including conservatives because he thinks they're ickypusses.
A coalition of Libertarians and Taliban can also end forced marriage of child brides
A coalition of Liberaltarians and Antifa can also end violence at political rallies
A coalition of Liberaltarians and grizzly bears can stop salmon fishing in Kodak
You notice how when it is Cancel Culture or deplatforming or anything that is done 99% or more by Progressives, it always has to be "Both Sides" with Fonzie and the senior Reasonistas - but when it comes to something that actually was a "Both Sides" problem, it's up to the Liberaltarians and the Progressive statists to band together to stop evil Conservativedom
Of course he won't. Did you really believe he would?
He is more likely to double down.
Double up, more likely. You can double down only once.
Only morons though Biden would end any of this.
But morons are the majority. Isn't is democratic to let them set the rules?
Are you effing kidding? You seriously thought that Biden would end this?
The Democratic party wants more surveillance of Americans, they have said so: they want all financial transactions transmitted to the government, and they want people with opinions that differ from the party line to be treated as potential domestic terrorists.
Hi) My name is Paula, I'm 24 years old) Beginning SEX model 18+) Please rate my photos at the link - http://xurl.es/id378955