Hong Kong Protesters Combat the Surveillance State
Encryption, other privacy measures, and decentralization have made the protest movement possible.
HD DownloadA major priority of the protest movement that has consumed Hong Kong for the past three and a half months has been to thwart the surveillance apparatus that's virtually everywhere. Demonstrators have felled camera poles with chainsaws, spray-painted security camera lenses, used green lasers to destroy sensors, and shielded themselves with umbrellas while marching through the streets.
"I think there a growing concern [in Hong Kong] about surveillance, and this [is] totally understandable because there's a total lack of trust in the government with this whole saga over the last several months," says Charles Mok, a legislator representing the city's technology sector.
Though Hong Kong is politically autonomous under the "one country, two systems" model, local authorities have wired up the city, enabling them to keep an eye on every corner of public life—and protesters suspect they may be sharing that information with the Chinese government.
Hong Kong officials deny that cameras on the top of the city's so-called Smart Lampposts feed location or facial recognition data to Beijing, but that may be a lie. Activists with the political organization Demosisto analyzed the internal components of one of these cameras and found an ethernet switch that could conceivably connect to the mainland's surveillance network. They also found components inside that were manufactured by a known supplier of surveillance technology to the Chinese government.
Many demonstrators use virtual private networks, or VPNs, to access the internet, and they communicate through Telegram, which fully encrypts their messages.
"Without safe communication, I don't think this revolution [could] last for that long," says Wincent Hung, founder of Genesis Block, a Hong Kong–based cryptocurrency exchange. "The government [could] track down everybody very, very easily if there [were] no encryption in this revolution."
Demonstrators are also refraining from using their credit cards or the digital payments system Octopus, which is an option in Hong Kong's public transit system and most stores.
"People are quite wary about cybersecurity and their digital footprints," says Amon Liu, an activist with Demosisto. "All their personal information [have been used] for past prosecutions by the police. So that's why they use cash this time."
To discuss strategy, demonstrators use LIHKG, a social media site that allows anonymous posting and is known as the Reddit of Hong Kong.
They've also created decentralized networks for sharing information through AirDrop, a function on the iPhone that transfers data directly to another person via Bluetooth without a third-party intermediary.
"This is a movement that is totally leaderless and decentralized," says Denise Ho, a Hong Kong–based singer and pro-democracy activist. "[Youth activists] have used…the tools on the Internet to really find a newer way to organize this sort of movement and to really sustain it in the longer term."
The protest movement's unofficial motto is "be water," a Bruce Lee phrase that's meant to convey that in battle, a more fluid and malleable adversary is harder to stop.
A major factor motivating the protesters in their fight to maintain autonomy from mainland China is the surveillance apparatus that the Beijing government imposes on its own citizens. Under the "social credit system," for example, individuals are rated for good behavior and a bad score can impede their ability to travel, attend the best schools, or get hired for the best jobs.
The Hong Kong government has stopped answering protesters' demands, and the conflict grew more acrimonious on October 1, after a police officer shot and injured an 18-year-old demonstrator who had attempted to hit him with a rod. Last week, the government announced a ban on wearing face masks in the streets.
"It has escalated to a point where people are realizing what we need is a political reform in the whole Hong Kong legislative system," says Ho. "And also, of course, the communist government is not backing down either. So we are preparing ourselves for an even longer fight."
Produced by Zach Weissmueller. Camera by Edwin Lee.
Photo credit: Aaron Guy Leroux/Sipa USA/Newscom
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Don't see it ending well for Hong Kong. Xi has lost far too much face already, and the 70th anniversary is coming up. There's nothing the rest of the world can do.
Kinda funny about Trump and all his tariffs and sanctions. If he hadn't shot his wad with those, he might have some weapon against China. But he can't do much more with tariffs, and his Iranian sanctions have already spread wide enough to get backlash, ensnaring Chinese oil tankers. Nothing left there. Not that he could have done much, but now he can't do squat.
Not that this is a particularly good idea, but doesn't he have the option of individually sanctioning Chinese leaders? Or has he already done that?
He probably can, but that sounds like desperation, scraping the bottom of the barrel.
The 70th anniversary was Tuesday, October 1st.
Oops! Well I am surprised -- I expected Xi to do something before then. Guess I don't prognosticate so well for Xi and the PRC.
These protesters are brilliant! Let's learn all we can about their tactics; we may need them ourselves, soon enough.
--Leslie <
Actually, there's plenty more that Trump can do -- such as tightening alliances and trade agreements with every country in Asia that hates China, particularly India.
--Leslie <
The Don could again pick up the phone and talk to Taiwan's president, this time about the possibility of Hong Kong declaring independence and seeking an alliance with a non-communist neighbor. Eng-Land, sated with its opium wars, has abandoned Hong Kong. Surely it has occurred to someone to seek alliance with Tsia Ing-Wen and her democratic supporters, no?
Speaking of surveillance state, WTF Snowden: https://twitter.com/Snowden/status/1179510505708359681
"I am neither Democrat nor Republican, but Sanders is in my opinion the most fundamentally decent man in politics. His life-long struggle for a more equitable society is a reminder of how far we have come—and a challenge to complete the journey. #GetWellBernie"
Hmm. Some people can be very smart in some things and very dumb in others.
Clearly. One wonders how you can have a socialist megastate without systematic privacy violations.
Actually, most people would be lucky to be smart about even one thing.
But back to what seems like Snowden's cognitive dissonance, the fear of control by big corporations that most progressives whine about seems ironic given their desire for control by big government. Why prefer a surveillance state over a surveillance economy?
Those idiots imagine they could control the state, and that the business people are anonymous unaccountable thieves. When in fact it is nearly the opposite.
As an aside, I wish people who wore Guy Fawkes masks would, you know, actually study what Guy Fawkes wanted and called for.
Papal dominance?
Gay marriage?
Pineapple pizza?
Don't be silly. That was the South Seas bubble 150 years later.
Girls asking guys to the dance?
Dystopian comic books?
The protesters are getting their asses kicked.
They are having zero effect on the surveillance state. That battle has been lost.
We are barely opening our eyes to the advancement of the surveillance state here. That battle will be lost too.
We’d better battle for the ability to record our own memories to combat the bias of the state.
What technology has birthed can be battled by new technologies. I have turned my tinfoil hat into a tinfoil sombrero, for instance, thus shielding my face from facial recognition technology, while still preventing mind reading/control by the illuminati.
That's quality innovation, right there. Be careful the lizard people don't cheat you out of your patent, though.
"We are barely opening our eyes to the advancement of the surveillance state here. That battle will be lost too."
Blackface renders facial recognition useless. So does KISS makeup and Juggalo war paint. Just have to pick your flavor.
Now we just need people in the west to realise that they're often under surveillance while online.
There are the equivalent of green lasers for that too.
Take a lesson from your Hong Kong brothers and sisters.
Our Hong Kong brothers and sisters are wishing they had X-ray lasers right about now. They should organize a Libertarian Defense Caucus at the very least.
Has "The Moon is a Harsh Mistress" been translated into Chinese?
I get the impression that Cixin Liu has read it, at least.
I think all are agreed that AI is beneficial as well as dangerous for human it hold all command without giving your instruction
Best Xiaomi earbuds 2020