Dave Barry Is Running for President (Again)
America's favorite libertarian humorist on fake news, Florida, getting woke, and getting old
HD DownloadDave Barry is the author of approximately eleventy billion books and the recipient of exactly one Pulitzer Prize. For four decades he wrote a weekly column, syndicated from his home base at the Miami Herald, and he is the author of an annual, despairing, hilarious "Year in Review."
Barry's books formed the basis for a short-lived show about his life, Dave's World, and his novel Big Trouble was made into a film of the same name. It's the story of a group of miscreants who wind up inadvertently stealing a nuclear suitcase and hijacking a plane due to their own incompetence. The film was set to be released—inauspiciously—on September 12, 2001.
In June, Reason's Katherine Mangu-Ward sat down with Barry to talk about his new book, Lessons from Lucy, America's strategic helium reserve (which Barry last discussed with Reason in 1994), jokes he can't tell anymore, and his perennial vaguely libertarian campaign for the presidency.
Interview by Katherine Mangu-Ward. Intro by Todd Krainin. Edited by Ian Keyser. Cameras by Krainin and Mark McDaniel.
'Vox Bubble Rumba' by Podington Bear is licensed under CC NC-BY 3.0
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Please Dave, run for president! Anyone but Orange Cheeto on the rigth and the Clown Posse on the left!
Quite frankly, the sanest person on the field right now is... Vermin Supreme.
the Clown Posse on the left
Now visualize Cory Booker as a juggalo.
Cory's down with the clown 'till he's dead in the ground.
I think Bernie would make a great clown. He would kill it at a children's birthday party. And by 'it', I don't mean any sense of mirth. I mean his flailing hands would knock some poor kid into the pool and kill the parents' Zinfandel buzz.
"No, that's not a giraffe, you little moron! That's exploitation!"
"Hello Georgie. Would you like free health care? It will come in handy after I tear your arm off! HA HA HA"
Yeah, Dave is more appealing than any of the D or R front runners. Which is a very sad distinction for US politics. (Sorry, Dave.)
I was re-watching Stranger Things 2, and noticed all the Reagon/Bush lawn signs. And then got all wistful about about that saner era. Back when the big political brouhaha was some dude with a bimbo in a boat. And how we needed to vote for Mondale so we could get a woman in office. Or something like that.
Today Reagan and GHW Bush would be hounded out of the party.
Today Reagan and GHW Bush would be hounded out of the party.
That's because they were globalist cucks.
Vote for Nobody for President!
Nobody's better than Trump!
Nobody's better than Hillary!
Nobody's better than Remy, even, although just barely.
Willie Nelson?
Waylon > Johnny > Kristofferson > Willie imho
That's quite a soul train.
i agree w/this.
Johnny > Willie > Waylon
Kristofferson doesn't belong on the same line with those greats.
Yes!!! That's my one wish, that every ballot has to have None of the Above as a choice.
I wish this even if we don't honor "none of the above". At a minimum, it means that a sneaky vote counter can't quietly fill in the bubbles that happen to favor their choices for candidates.
(For a ballot that requests choosing three, I would go so far as to say that there should be options like "no one", "only one" and "only two", for the same reason.)
(Having said that, I think it would be good to have a "none of the above" result in the office being unfilled until the next election if it got enough votes, too.)
"Interview by Katherine Mangu-Ward. Intro by Todd Krainin. Edited by Ian Keyser. Cameras by Krainin and Mark McDaniel. DIDN'T REGAN DO A CAMERA?"
I DON'T KNOW, WHY ARE YOU SHOUTING?
Dad jokes are in af right now
I hope you're not suggesting that all, or even a large proportion, of Barry's jokes are Dad jokes.
He's the New Balance 608 of comedy.
De gustibus non est disputandum, which is Latin for "some people find Dave Barry funny, and others are...Crusty."
Eddy is disgusted by dad jokes and always strives to move his humor away from such filth.
...so the midget says, "I rang the doorbell, didn't I?"
He hasn't even been metoo-ed so he's not cool enough for Crusty
Dave Berry is a good guy, but I'm still voting for Johnny Fuckerfaster.
At least he knows what he's doing and does it in a very quick manner.
So what is Erma Bombeck up to?
Perhaps you would prefer the hip stylings of millennial comedians:
https://www.thegrablegroup.com/comedy/young-comedians-entertain-millennial-audience/
"America's favorite libertarian humorist..."
Dave Barry is great but I think that PJ O'Rourke is "America's favorite libertarian humorist", even if has gone ever so slightly for interventionism these days.
I'm completely against any form of government welfare, but whether we're talking about Social Security, or Food Stamps and Housing, or sending troops to Germany and South Korea, I have enough of a heart to insist that we should wean off those who are receiving support.
An 80-year-old who has depended on Social Security for the last 15 years shouldn't have their funding cut off. They should be provided for to the day they die.
A single mom shouldn't have to decide that it's better to continue to get benefits than get a raise, because the raise cuts off certain benefits, and she gets a net loss of income for supporting her family. Benefits should be tapered off in such a way that seeking raises should be encouraged.
A country shouldn't be left defenseless just because we chose to pull out our troops. We should announce our intention in four years, and offer citizens basic militia training (and require an accompanying respect for something akin to the Second Amendment), so that if some country decided to invade, the entire citizenry would be ready to fight back.
But then, if we do this, people can't be dependent on the State, and thus politicians can't rely on the ability to threaten the removal of benefits (and demonize their opponents as someone who *will* do so), and thus hold their own constituents hostage for getting their votes...so politicians aren't going to change any time soon.
That, and voters somehow like getting bribes from these politicians for their votes, which bribes are paid for by politicians sending out thugs to take their money in the first place!
(Both sides do it. Heck, Libertarian Ron Paul himself did it, albeit in a sneaky way: he'd amend the bills to benefit his constituents, and then vote against the bills he amended because of the pork spending included, which would then be passed anyway.)
Thanks admin for giving such valuable information through your article . Your article is much more similar to https://www.bocsci.com/at9283-cas-896466-04-9-item-84-100114.html word unscramble tool because it also provides a lot of knowledge of vocabulary new words with its meanings.