John Stossel

Stossel: Bad Laws Worsen the Homeless Crisis

San Francisco encourages homelessness by limiting housing, offering generous welfare, and failing to enforce basic laws.


HD Download

San Francisco is one of America's richest cities, yet it has a major problem with homelessness and crime. An average of 85 cars are broken into daily, yet fewer than 2 percent lead to arrests.

The homeless themselves are often harassed. "They run around and they shout at themselves," one man who usually sleeps on the streets told our crew. "They make it bad for people like us that hang out with a sign."

Since store owners can't rely on city cops for help, some have hired private police to patrol their stores. There used to be hundreds of these private cops citiwide—and then the city's police union complained. There are fewer than 10 left.

San Francisco's politicians have promised to help the homeless going back decades. In 1982, Mayor Dianne Feinstein bragged about creating "a thousands units right here in the Tenderloin." In 2002, Mayor Willie Brown said "you gotta do something about it." In 2008, Mayor Gavin Newsom boasted about moving "6,860 human beings off the street." In 2018, San Francisco passed a new local tax to help pay for homeless services.

Why have the results been so lackluster? One reason: San Francisco has the nation's highest rents.

Laura Foote runs the non-profit "YIMBY Action," which stands for "yes in my backyard." The organization promotes policies that encourage more housing construction as a way to bring down prices.

Many San Francisco residents object to this mission.

"I would hate it," one woman told John Stossel.

"I think it'd be really congested," said another.

"Let me build," said developer John Dennis. He spent years trying to get permission to replace a graffiti-covered, long-defunct meat-packing plant with a 60-unit building. He eventually got permission—but it took 4 years.

"And all that time, we're paying property taxes and we're paying for maintenance of the building," Dennis told Stossel.

"I'll never do another project here," he says.

Subscribe to our YouTube channel.
Like us on Facebook.
Follow us on Twitter.
Subscribe to our podcast at iTunes.

The views expressed in this video are solely those of John Stossel; his independent production company, Stossel Productions; and the people he interviews. The claims and opinions set forth in the video and accompanying text are not necessarily those of Reason.

NEXT: Remy: Better Now?

HD Download

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. Thank you John Stossel for being one of the only real libertarians who still provides content here!

    Every day I’m more and more amazed that George Soros hasn’t had you banished yet.

  2. Much of the blame for homelessness should be placed at the feet of homeless advocates. Program after program and millions of dollars can’t solve the problem until common sense is allowed to take priority. The issue shouldn’t be homes for all, it should be shelter. Too many homeless are in need of mental help, meaning time in some type of an institution. It sounds heartless until you realize that the only alternative is living in filth. Those in need of mental help may or may not be involved with drugs and alcohol but no matter what substance abuse gets blamed when the problems run deeper. The second type of homeless are the criminal homeless and in California there has been a correlation between the increase in homeless and the passing of Prop 47 and 57 and related cases. This is one area that us Libertarians have it wrong. The mass incarceration whining crap makes sense when you’re talking about having a bit of weed but not for harder stuff. I’ve seen this up close and the mantra that “it’s up to you what you put in your body, not the government” sounds smart but for most hard drugs, specifically meth and heroin it is rarely and maybe never something that effects only the user.
    If you deal with these two categories of homeless, the rest of the problem will be much smaller and much more manageable.

Please to post comments