Cornell law professor Michael Dorf asks whether Clarence Thomas would vote to strike down federal laws restricting abortion, on federalism grounds. The answer might well be yes. But the issue would have to be presented to him in the right way.
The justices have passed up one opportunity after another to clarify the boundaries of the constitutional right to arms.
Asset forfeiture has "led to egregious and well-chronicled abuses," Thomas writes.
Correcting a liberal smear about the conservative Supreme Court justice.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10
