The Politics of Permanent Outrage
Lauren Hall looks at the roots of political tribalism, why voters feel trapped between false choices, and how radical moderation offers a way out of constant polarization.
This week, guest host Eric Boehm is joined by Lauren Hall, a political science professor at the Rochester Institute of Technology and the author of The Radical Moderate's Guide to Life, a Substack newsletter that encourages readers to reject binary thinking and keep politics from consuming every part of their lives.
Hall's work focuses on the roots of tribalism and political polarization, examining where they come from, why they are so powerful, and how they distort both public debate and personal relationships. She has grown increasingly concerned about the populist impulses shaping American politics on both the right and the left, and about how political elites frame elections as a choice between the lesser of two evils.
In the interview, Boehm and Hall discuss what it means to be a "radical moderate," why she believes that outlook offers a way out of America's broken political compass, and the diverse intellectual influences that have shaped her political philosophy. They also talk about what Hall did not anticipate in the second Donald Trump White House, and how moderates can navigate a political culture that rewards outrage, loyalty tests, and constant engagement.
The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie goes deep with the artists, entrepreneurs, and scholars who are making the world a more libertarian—or at least a more interesting—place by championing "free minds and free markets."
0:00—Introduction
1:17—What is radical moderation?
6:24—Third parties in America
9:19—Polarization and elitism
15:13—Evolutionary biology and tribalism
27:24—Hall's path to political science
35:06—Culture of Rochester, New York
41:39—Expectations for the second Trump administration
47:19—Radical moderate advice for Democrats
51:03—Lessons from Edmund Burke
- Producer: Paul Alexander
- Audio Mixer: Ian Keyser
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
Zzzzzzz
More of reason depending they are the neutral ones.
"...about how political elites frame elections as a choice between the lesser of two evils.
In the interview, Boehm and Hall discuss what it means to be a "radical moderate," why she believes that outlook offers a way out of America's broken political compass, and the diverse intellectual influences that have shaped her political philosophy."
Which is a species of populism in itself, as it postulates malevolent elites preventing the people from expressing their true will where all differences in policy visions are conveniently hammered out to everyone's general satisfaction.
Lauren doesn't have a nose ring, blue hair, big chunky black glasses, or tattoos, and she's not wearing a keffiyeh. Yet she claims to have an advanced degree?
I'm skeptical...
Advanced degree in this case just means no actual real world experience but she knows things so trust her. Self appointed expert from books.
Reminds me of the first time i saw someone have a PhD in Reading.
Gee, if only there was a political philosophy that limited government so much that it would not matter which tribe was most popular.
Anarchists of the world, UNITE!!
The first time I read of an Anarchists Union fighting on the communist side in Spain's 1936-39 civil war, I was mighty confused. Then I found out that left libertarians are a thing. Their main schtick is denying the existence of private property. Some limit that to the means of production. Others extend it to houses, cars, etc. The most extreme extend it to everything, including underwear and toothbrushes.
There are some mighty weird people in the world. About the only good thing about the most extreme left libertarians is that sharing underwear and toothbrushes shows they at least stick to their principles ... although I imagine the only way they could ever get underwear and toothbrushes is by theft, since any kind of organized production, like textile or toothbrush factories, is impossible with their principles.
>>Their main schtick is denying the existence of private property.
I loved wearing my Property is Theft! shirt when I had one. Contradictions be damned lol.
Dyslexics of the world UNTIE!
Gee, we could start a magazine and a web site right here in the barn!
My mother always told me I had indigenous ancestry specifically of the Cherokee pursuasion. It was very cool to have a tribe. My high cheekbones were a dead giveaway and I was on track for a high paid job at Harvard. Until an ill advised DNA test destroyed my dream. Tribeless and cast adrift I became a libertarian, or at least identified as one. Free minds and free markets. What could go wrong? But the ever evolving tribe left me behind. These days I'm looking at the Groypers. Don't know a lot about these fellas but they're like super famous at Reason. What could go wrong?
Quick question if the blacks get reparations how much do the charokee owe? 30% of their population was slaves
First thing is people need to be honest and stop labelling racism as a far right staple.
Also labelling religion, White Nationalism, homophobia and misogyny as on the right.
What do any of these things have to do with Anarchy or limited government or Libertarianism? How can it be said that these things are not among socialists, Marxists, liberals, democrats or other parties on the left?
Suggesting that there are no religious people voting democrat or for socialist policies is ridiculous.
Suggesting that the Taliban is on the right when they are completely Totalitarian and socialist. Same for most of Islam.
To suggest that being a nationalist is on one side or the other is wrong on it's face as plenty of nationalist folks are socialists. And to act as though white people are the only nationalists is absurd.
This is all propagated from the left to attempt to make anyone in the middle or on the right who have not bent the knee to their demands and agenda as the "other" and evil or bad.
The gullible, naive, power hungry, elite and narcissists follow along with this leftist propaganda believing they are smarter, have higher moral standards, stand above and can punch down and know better and deserve the power to tell everyone else how they should live.
love is the answer.
I've had the blues
The reds and the pinks
One thing for sure
possibly most underrated band ever.
Fuck you. Cover the Walz/Somali fraud story.
agreed, but also be happy he didn't complain about tariffs for two minutes
They sadly assigned Boehm to it.
The Radical Moderate's Guide to Life, a Substack newsletter that encourages readers to reject binary thinking and keep politics from consuming every part of their lives.
Man, it must be exhausted telling TDS-suffering blue-city lefties to shut up and calm down.
Tribalism is built into our genes by millions of years of evolution. It takes intelligence, experience, and steadfastness to overcome that instinct and choose cooperative productivity and tolerance instead. With the understanding, of course, that at any moment fear can temporarily derail the good times and turn them back into the dark ages.
I'm in the 'reject tribalism tribe'. You're either with us or against us.