Christina Dent: The Evangelical Christian Fighting To End the Drug War
The evangelical Christian argues that drug legalization is the conservative thing to do.
This week's guest is Christina Dent, whose organization, End It For Good, seeks to change the approach to addiction from a criminal justice issue to a health-centered one. But Dent is not your typical anti–drug war activist. She's an evangelical Christian who believes legalizing drugs is the conservative thing to do—a position she adopted after an encounter she had as a foster mom.
Reason's Billy Binion and Dent talked about her conservative religious upbringing, the surprising history of the war on drugs, how the current approach to substance abuse fuels crime, misconceptions about people struggling with addiction, and why prohibition is actually a progressive response. She has also offered to send a copy of her recent memoir, Curious, free of charge to anyone interested in learning more, which you can request at curious@enditforgood.com.
0:00—Introduction
4:45—The foster experience that changed Dent
11:43—What causes addiction?
16:55—Addiction and recovery are not one-size-fits-all.
25:57—Drug criminalization is anti-Christian conservative values
33:14—Helping families struggling with addiction
41:34—Decriminalization efforts in the U.S.
46:52—The costs and tradeoffs of legalization
59:43—Is Dent conservative or Republican?
1:02:15—Dent's law enforcement outreach
1:17:26—Effective treatment is not cold turkey or zero-sum.
- Video Editor: Ian Keyser
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
""seeks to change the approach to addiction from a criminal justice issue to a health-centered one.""
The problem is the health-centered one only works for people who want to participate. Sometimes criminal justice gets involved to mandate treatment.
I agree, using the drugs should not be a crime. However if you commit a crime while using drugs you can't use drugs as the excuse.
I know/known lots of drug users. Most of the "justice involved" people who did time did so because of crimes they committed while on drugs. Not for the drugs themselves.
But because drugs are illegal, addicts are compelled to commit crimes to pay the prices that illegal substances necessarily involve. Dealers add in the risk of prison, as well as all other components of cost and risk when pricing their product.
Somebody's gotta decriminalize insulin.
Illogical in the exterme.
Where one is an addict anybody will raise prices. Look at CA fires.
"LA wildfires create spike in rent prices, forcing rental listing sites to act"
Dealers don't do either. Why do you think they target children? As a way of avoiding risk, a child is probably not an undercover narc.
You speak of cost and risk but all low-level dealers MUST be part of a hierarchy of increasingly evil characters.
Addicts are compelled--- If something has the poosibility of turning me into a thief and murderer I just don't do it.Traditional ethical teaching going bact to OT and the Greeks: The first free act that puts you on a path you know might lead to addiction/compulsion IS THE MOST EVIL
Legalizing drugs is working out so well for Colorado (sarcasm). Every loser and deadbeat is showing up and destroying this state. The liberal nitwits who want to make the government your daddy keep voting in laws that encourage this behavior. Soon, we will be California.
Don't conflate drug legalization with decriminalization. The latter does nothing to eliminate the black market and the gang crime that comes with it.
Also, CO didn't decriminalize hard drugs. I think you meant to say WA and OR. But what all of these leftist-run places did was de-facto, and in some cases, de jure decriminalization of property crimes and violent crimes.
My libertarian approach would have been to legalize all drugs, while still enforcing property rights, punishing violent crime and theft (no Soros DAs deciding not to prosecute because of racial justice BS), and not incentivizing addicts by giving them money and other free shit. If you want to take heroin, go ahead; you own your body and are free to do stupid shit to yourself. But taxpayers aren't going to subsidize your habit, and if you commit actual crimes, you will be prosecuted, not coddled.
I would heartily support your libertarian approach. Unfortunately, some Pollyanna always seems to come along and "help others with your money!
Progressives are the most generous... with other people's money.
Taxoayers do support them , you are wrong.
THe work they don't do, the taxes they don't pay, the messed-up children they foist on the world and that hazy horrible mist of deprssion that descends on all who know them and watch this happening.
Go bact to 60s and 70s when libertarians emptied the loonies on society at large if you want respnsibility for this.
IF this bothers you analyze at another level.. I taught college for about 10 years and saw graduates who couldn't give anybody a minimum wage'sf worth of return. They become the society outcasts,not all, but many.
Isn't she the congress candidate who was (unfairly) attacked because she shared her PERSONAL opinion on birth control when asked without ever intimating she'd try to outlaw it?
Wasn't reason part of that attack on personal values?
She shouldn't have to tie her opposition to anything related to office. You elect a person not a rubber stamp. This reminds me of Sen Collins, a bloody dumb woman, who attacked Justice Kavanaugh for --- in my words--- suckering a poor innocent naive Senator about Roe v Wade.
She's an evangelical Christian who believes legalizing drugs is the conservative thing to do
Then she's not an evangelical Christian.
Well even the way it's reported --- even the way she might report it-- if she is a mother, or lives in a neighborhood with lots of kids, she might think "Oh, there are better ways to spend this money, or this is important but other things more important, or I only think this because I don't know the full story.
At any rate nobody posts an article
Mary x The not-Evangelical not-Christian Fighting To End the Drug War
and why is that ???
Take it from ATF, the Papal Pederast--soi disant expert on Inquisitions, Pear of Anguish and girl-bullying.
Anyone can huff gasoline for $3/gal.
They do drugs literally just as a big F'You to all the Karens and Babysitters out there.
And a welfare-state that funds it.
C'mon, readers aren't that stupid. You mentioned "Christian' to mock. Even a Christian can see that blah, blah. blah... Why does the beliefs of an arguer change the argument [m,
Most odd that this signature Libertarian position gets so few comments. And why is that? Ignorance of our political system,of Economics ,and of Natural Law.
If Trump sends the Marines after Tren de Arague they are gone, gone, gone.