Daniel Akst: The World War II Pacifists Who Changed America Forever
"Christian libertarians" Bayard Rustin and David Dellinger challenged state power and ended up leading the civil rights movement and anti-Vietnam War protests.
My guest today is Daniel Akst, a journalist and novelist who has written one of the most remarkable books I've read in a while. War By Other Means: The Pacifists of the Greatest Generation Who Revolutionized Resistance is an irresistibly readable history of peace-mongering practitioners of "Christian libertarianism" who refused to sign on to America's entry into World War II even after Pearl Harbor.
Two of the main figures in the book, Bayard Rustin and David Dellinger, served prison sentences in the 1940s for refusing to even register as conscientious objectors—they said the state had no right to make such demands on them. Along with others such as Catholic Worker founder Dorothy Day, they pioneered the use of nonviolent resistance that energized the Civil Rights Movement and anti–Vietnam War protests in which they would figure so prominently.
Akst discusses Dwight Macdonald, the leftist writer and editor who worked at Fortune magazine, staunchly opposed the Soviet Union, ruthlessly critiqued mass media, and mentored a generation of public intellectuals including Lionel Trilling, Mary McCarthy, and Bruno Bettelheim. He also explores the origins of the short-lived America First Committee, which opposed U.S. entry into World War II and whose members and sympathizers included a wide range of people, including future President Gerald Ford, Kennedy in-law and Peace Corps leader Sargent Shriver, author Gore Vidal, Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart, and National Review founder William F. Buckley.
In War By Other Means, Akst recovers a lost current in American politics that will make you think differently about the past and the present, especially given how identity politics and the worst sort of unprincipled tribalism reign supreme in our world today.
Read Max Longley's review of War By Other Means in the March 2023 issue of Reason.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Rustin, for one, expressed a naive appreciation for communism when young.
Leaping forward to a naive belief in non-violence, it may have worked well in America in the Civil Rights Movement, but one wonders how it would have applied to Nazi or Jap Imperialist invaders? I once asked a Quaker how they would respond if they discovered an outlaw motorcycle gang had taken possession of their meetinghouse. His response is they would do nothing but fortunately they had non-pacifist neighbors who would call the cops for them! How nice to be able to outsource self-defense in order to stay true to your beliefs.
Remodeling $700 on a daily basis with my telephone part-time. currently I’ve gotten my fifth record for $19,632 and each one I’ve created has over up duplicating and pasting pictures online. Fv10 This trade builds american kingdom able to make further money daily for clear aiming and jobs and additionally the quality earnings are simply awesome…
See this article for more information————————>>>usdtpay
Good point. Pacifism appeals to me. I respect it. But there is a limit. Pearl Harbor and 9-11 are two examples of crossing a limit line. But this book sounds like it is worth the read.
I get paid between $145 and $395 an hour online. I heard about this job 3 months ago and after joining it I easily made $23,000 with no online skills. Just try it on the companion page..
.
.
.
For Details►—————————————➤ https://Www.Coins71.Com
I don't agree with the pacifism in such circumstances, but I will respect them for having standards in a world where moral standards are mocked.
I will turn my own cheek, but I draw the line at striking my neighbor's cheek. This is why I won't ever be a true pacifist.
So when we counsel love of neighbor and turn the other cheek -- even the highest ideals --- are we condemning soldiering, for example?
NO
JACQUES MARITAIN
A crucial part of Augustine's account of "just war" lies in his interpretation of the scriptural passages which some Christians may take to prohibit Christians from participating in war. Augustine said that "If the Christian Religion forbade war altogether, those who sought salutary advice in the Gospel would rather have been counselled to cast aside their arms, and to give up soldiering altogether. On the contrary, they were told: 'Do violence to no man . . . and be content with your pay' [Lk. 3:14. If he commanded them to be content with their pay, he did not forbid soldiering." Or again that the precept to "turn the other cheek" means that our inner attitude should be not inclined to vengence and hence the precept "should always be borne in readiness of mind, so that we be ready to obey them." In his survey of just war in the middle ages, Jonathon Barnes says: "Augustine's scriptural exegesis may raise a sceptical eyebrow or an outraged hackle, but it was gratefully accepted and piously parroted by the medieval political theorists: by returning a negative answer to the question ''s soldiering always a sin?'' Augustine made room for a morality of warfare and a theory of just war.
The Good Samaritan --- what would he do if he stumbled on the actual attack? He would fight like a Maccabee.
Online, Google paid $45 per hour. Nine months have passed since my close relative last had a job, but in the previous month she earned $10500 by working 8 hours a day from home. Now is the time for everyone to try this job by using this website…
Click the link—↠ http://Www.Smartjob1.com
"peace-mongering practitioners of "Christian libertarianism" who refused to sign on to America's entry into World War II even after Pearl Harbor."
Shrike and Jeff call them Christian Nationalists nowadays.
If you would only respect FACTS
“There is no question we should have attempted … to go after Auschwitz,” [ George ]McGovern said in the interview. “There was a pretty good chance we could have blasted those rail lines off the face of the earth, which would have interrupted the flow of people to those death chambers, and we had a pretty good chance of knocking out those gas ovens.”
And that is George McGovern.
David Dellinger went on to be one of the Chicago Seven, and was convicted for crossing state lines with intent to incite a riot.
Because he was a pacifist.
But... but... but... we have to keep going to war otherwise the other side will win!
If they changed America forever, why is resistance still completely futile? If an aggrieved minority - i.e. libertarians - could resist tyranny by using their methods, why is tyranny large and growing? Also, I could have picked a better war to resist than World War II, even if the trend may have ended Vietnam sooner. And whatever happened to the war protestors in Iraq, Afghanistan, the Balkans, Libya and Syria?
I worked part-time from my apartment and earned $30,030. After losing my previous business, I quickly became exhausted. Fortunately, I discovered this jobs online, and as a result, I was able to start earning money from home right away. Anyone can accomplish this elite career and increase their internet income by….
After reading this article………………….>>> http://www.jobsrevenue.com
I don’t know who said it, but I agree: “Those who beat their swords into plowshares end up plowing for those who don’t.”
Or as Clintie put it:
There’s Only Two Kinds of People
https://youtu.be/6YnryHbJqC4
While there's no dishonor in avoiding a fight, the bad guy always has the first shot and when a fight is unavoidable, free people with rational minds must prepare.
WE should not assume that pacifism implies any stance at all towards grave unquestionable evils
“There is no question we should have attempted … to go after Auschwitz,” [ George ]McGovern said in the interview. “There was a pretty good chance we could have blasted those rail lines off the face of the earth, which would have interrupted the flow of people to those death chambers, and we had a pretty good chance of knocking out those gas ovens.”