What We Got Right and Wrong About 2021 (and What We Predict for 2022)
Plus, the CDC's amateur psychoanalyzing.

The Reason Roundtable is back! After a week off from being affected by the pandemic one way or another, Matt Welch, Katherine Mangu-Ward, Peter Suderman, and Nick Gillespie discuss the new COVID-19 variant and their predictions for 2022.
Discussed in the show:
1:44: The new COVID-19 variant and the latest policy changes.
19:50: Weekly Listener Question: Help me understand something. Anthony Fauci is in charge of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. As such he has almost no statutory authority. He can't make anybody do anything. In his role as White House adviser his job is to dispense advice. That's it. He has the moral authority of someone who led his agency through the AIDS crisis and the intellectual authority of someone who has done actual science in service of human health, but he can't give an order that anyone has to obey. So why has Reason (maybe not all of its writers, but I'm lookin' at you Mr. Soave) jumped on the bandwagon to cast him as a comic book supervillain? There are people and agencies of the government that bear direct responsibility for obstructing solutions to this crisis and exploited it for political gain. Good on you for calling them on it. But why has this man become the target of choice for vilification, when really all he can do is make suggestions?
31:05: 2022 predictions!
57:34: Media recommendations for the week. (And click here for all of the Roundtable's media recommendations, ever.)
This week's links:
- "CNN's Leana Wen: 'Cloth Masks Are Little More Than Facial Decorations,'" by Robby Soave
- "Against Faucism," by Robby Soave
- "Fauci Wants To Kick the Unvaxxed Off of Airplanes," by Matt Welch
- "RIP, 'Pandemic of the Unvaccinated,'" by Matt Welch
- "We Don't Know Why Murder Rates Spiked in 2020," by Brian Doherty
- "What's inside Tyler Perry's new $250M Southwest Atlanta movie studio?" by Sean Richard Keenan
- "The Matrix Resurrections Is Less a Sequel and More a Bizarre Thinkpiece About The Matrix's Legacy," by Peter Suderman
Send your questions to roundtable@reason.com. Be sure to include your social media handle and the correct pronunciation of your name.
Today's sponsors:
- We all want to make sure our family is protected in a medical emergency. What many of us don't realize is that health insurance won't always cover the full amount of an emergency medical flight. Even with comprehensive coverage, you could get hit with high deductibles and co-pays. That's why an AirMedCare Network membership is so important. As a member, if an emergency arises, you won't see a bill for air medical transport when flown by an AMCN provider. Best of all, a membership covers your entire household for as little as $85 a year. Now, as a listener of our show, you'll get up to a $50 Visa or Amazon gift card with a new membership. Simply visit AirMedCareNetwork.com/reason and use offer code REASON.
- If you feel something interfering with your happiness or holding you back from your goals, BetterHelp is an accessible and affordable source for professional counseling. BetterHelp assesses your needs and matches you with a licensed therapist you can start talking to in under 24 hours, all online.
Audio production by Ian Keyser
Assistant production by Regan Taylor
Music: "Angeline," by The Brothers Steve
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Koch-funded libertarians got the most important thing right about 2021 — they knew Biden would be great for billionaires. That's why they endorsed him in 2020, after all.
Indeed, the 10 richest Americans increased their net worths by a combined $324 billion in Biden's first year. Meanwhile the federal minimum wage didn't rise by even one penny.
#OBLsFirstLaw
#BillionairesForBiden
This is the best you can do? Biden can't wave a magic wand and raise the minimum wage or tax billionaires without Congress' approval. Where he can change things he has (ordering 15 minimum wage for federal contractors) and he's called both for a wider minimum wage raise and billionaires tax but Congress didn't bite.
LOL
Democrats control the White House and Congress but — gosh darn it! — we're getting the rapid concentration of wealth at the very top we'd expect from 1980s "decade of greed" Republican rule. What's going on? It can't possibly be that Democrats are doing exactly what their billionaire base wants ...... ?
No! I've got it! It's all because of Sinema and Manchin. I guess people who want to "drink billionaire tears" will just have to show up and vote Democrat again in the midterms. Yeah, 2023 will be the year we finally put a dent in Mark Zuckerberg's net worth. 😉
The switch from 'Biden' to 'Democrats.' Pathetic.
Well, you do know pathetic. It’s intrinsic to your being. Part of why you’re a democrat.
Sᴛᴀʀᴛ ᴡᴏʀᴋɪɴɢ ғʀᴏᴍ ʜᴏᴍᴇ! Gʀᴇᴀᴛ ᴊᴏʙ ғᴏʀ sᴛᴜᴅᴇɴᴛs, sᴛᴀʏ-ᴀᴛ-ʜᴏᴍᴇ ᴍᴏᴍs ᴏʀ ᴀɴʏᴏɴᴇ ɴᴇᴇᴅɪɴɢ ᴀɴ ᴇxᴛʀᴀ ɪɴᴄᴏᴍᴇ... Yᴏᴜ ᴏɴʟʏ ɴᴇᴇᴅ ᴀ ᴄᴏᴍᴘᴜᴛᴇʀ ᴀɴᴅ ᴀ ʀᴇʟɪᴀʙʟᴇ ɪɴᴛᴇʀɴᴇᴛ ᴄᴏɴɴᴇᴄᴛɪᴏɴ... Mᴀᴋᴇ $90 ʜᴏᴜʀʟʏ ᴀɴᴅ ᴜᴘ ᴛᴏ $12000 ᴀ ᴍᴏɴᴛʜ ʙʏ ғᴏʟʟᴏᴡɪɴɢ ʟɪɴᴋ ᴀᴛ ᴛʜᴇ ʙᴏᴛᴛᴏᴍ ᴀɴᴅ sɪɢɴɪɴɢ ᴜᴘ.i do.. Yᴏᴜ ᴄᴀɴ ʜᴀᴠᴇ ʏᴏᴜʀ ғɪʀsᴛ ᴄʜᴇᴄᴋ ʙʏ ᴛʜᴇ ᴇɴᴅ ᴏғ ᴛʜɪs ᴡᴇᴇᴋ,go to tech tab for work detail,.......... Visit Here
And an educator...
I know, we need the Trump and GOP plan to stick it to those billionaires by...checks notes...cutting their taxes and regulation of their ventures?
Wait, I'll come in again.
Sad
It really is. One of the idiots Yglesias laughed about when discussing how he gaslighted idiots about taxes.
It is sad for GOPers to try to attack Biden for billionaires getting wealthy and the minimum wage not rising. It's like Luthor criticizing Superman for not stopping both missiles.
I don’t criticize anyone for making money. That’s what freedom is.
So you didn't read the thread or you're just being a partisan troll?
A fifty-center like you of all people calling someone else a partisan troll is pretty amusing.
Yeah Patton, anyone who calls out your silliness must be a paid commenter!
Queenie, you’re a vile, lying hypocritical Marxist. Surely you still hate yourself enough to engage in self harm?
But what if he didn’t stop either missile?
That woosh is not one of the missiles going over your head...
Is it your sense of humor going out the window?
Maybe ;).
Humor requires some semblance of intelligence.
Leftists have no sense of humor
Says the dumb bitch arguing with a parody.
Republicans don’t try and pretend they don’t represent the Billionaire classes interest you retarded fucking monkey.
Hi shrike.
I'm shrike, you dumbass.
I own up to my posts.
No you don't. You switch socks often. You fucked up again in this thread lol. Stop using the same language like creeping people out calling them peanuts. Makes it too fucking obvious.
Uh, aren't I supposed to be 'shrike?' I never used 'language like creeping people out calling them peanuts.'
You're deranged.
Shrike. Don't be this stupid. I literally said qa was your sock. Now you made yourself look retarded.
And yes, you've called many people peanuts on all your socks shrike. One of your tells.
The peanut gallery got a whole lot more right than you did. For another year.
You're making Jesse mad.
No he isnt.
Donald Trump endorses fellow fascist lite Viktor Orban:
"Viktor Orbán of Hungary truly loves his Country and wants safety for his people. He has done a powerful and wonderful job in protecting Hungary, stopping illegal immigration, creating jobs, trade, and should be allowed to continue to do so in the upcoming Election. He is a strong leader and respected by all. He has my Complete support and Endorsement for reelection as Prime Minister!"
https://twitter.com/realLizUSA/status/1477997609792983042
Please continue talking about Drumpf nonstop in 2022 like you did throughout 2021, Mr. Buttplug.
Now, some people here will try to tell you it's pathetic to obsess about an unpopular ex-President who's been out of the White House for a year, has zero chance of ever returning, and isn't even on social media. Don't listen to them. You provide a valuable service every time you bring up Orange Hitler, even when it's only to comment on his genitalia.
#TinyMushroomDick
To be honest OBL, I thought Buttplug's 'HAPERINFLATION' of Chewin Tobaccy was inspired. 🙂
Don't change....ever. Please.
So?
The fact that all the Eurofacists are calling him Hitler and refusing to explain why, leads me to conclude that Orbán isn't actually a Hitler at all. He's just a danger to the Davos agenda and George 'Hitlerjugend' Soros' grift$$$.
Pluggo don’t need facts when there are tweets.
"People I think are bad don't like him so he must be good" is childish level thinking. I mean, the commies hated the fascists so I guess the latter were just a danger to the reds!
As compares to you using people you like to say he is bad shrike? As the comment notes. No actual examples.
WTF are you talking about?
Are you capable of reading?
The argument.
The fact that all the Eurofacists are calling him Hitler and refusing to explain why,
Your response
The fact that all the Eurofacists are calling him Hitler and refusing to explain why,
What you were unable to read.
and refusing to explain why,
Youre a dumb one shrike.
Middle quote of your response should be.
"People I think are bad don't like him so he must be good"
First of all, am I supposed to be 'shrike?' I get it, you live in some weird Patton Oswald-esque Super Fan world where another commenter named 'shrike' is your foil, and of course everyone who thinks you're silly here must be 'shrike.' Look, I'm not 'shrike,' I've got a long history of commenting, mostly on Volokh here. Don't be so pathetic. Get out of your basement.
Second, your argument is goofy. Why does the part you highlight change anything? Explain.
This should be fun.
You have fucked up so many times lol.
You protesting so badly at the same time with the socks is hilarious.
Do you know what the word and means and how it works in rhetorical arguments? It is a requirement of both clauses to be true.
So you can't explain?
I am Jack's Complete Lack of Surprise.
You can just say you don't understand what the word and means in rhetorical composition requiring both clauses to be true.
You have made yourself look terrible tonight. Take the night off buddy. Go look at the child porn you like.
No, no, don't use that troll move. I asked you to explain Why does the part you highlight change anything?
If you can't, you can't. Don't just jump to 'no, you explain' like a common, cowardly troll. Man up. Either explain or admit you were wrong. There would be more dignity in it.
Asking Jesse not to use a troll move is like asking a dog not to sniff butts.
"So you can't explain?"
Listen Shrike, you still haven't explained why Orban is bad, and yet look at you pretend that Jesse is the one obfuscating.
You're proving my point. Quit fucking around and tell us what makes him super hitler.
So ML can't explain either?
I am Jack's Complete Lack of Surprise.
Holy shit you are dumb shrike.
Ml says if p and q then r.
You respond
So if p then r is what you are saying.
I explain how no, he said if p and q then r.
You respond with how does logic work. Just a complete idiot tonight shrike.
And Jeff honey, why does someone bring on Rogan remove their PhD and over 100 published articles in journals.
Battle of the idiot leftists tonight.
Answer the question, Shrike, and quit trying to change the subject and turn it around on us.
What has Orban ever done or said that makes him Hitler?
And for fuck's sake stick to a sockpuppet. Either you're going to be Buttplug or QA.
Shrike, stop lying.
Why don't you embrace your fascist leanings like your fellow alt-right Trump-tards openly did at the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville?
ML, be honest for once. At least the Unite the Right pro-Trump neo-Nazi marchers were.
The liberal redefined version of fascism idiots like espouse. Or the actual definition used for 80 years?
You don't think a healthy portion of those at the Unite the Right march were fascists by the definition used for 80 years?
So youre sticking with the politically refined word. Good for you shrike.
Fascists can be on either side. It wasn't the right who sought to redefine it to point solely at the left shrike.
You forgot to change to your pedo sock btw.
"So youre sticking with the politically refined word."
WTF?
Are you autistic?
These dumbasses claim that Nazis were really bleeding-heart liberals.
This is why Jews hate Republicans almost as much as they hate Nazis.
Ironically, everywhere except in the US, Jews are some of the most consistently conservatives voters out there. Only here is that not true. And that is not the case, mind you, in the orthodox community.
Yo Buttplug, which Jews are you talking about? I mean, the uber-libs in my shul cordially detest anything to the right of The Bern. Others in my shul think differently. It is a mix.
My modern orthodox friends are no fans of Team D.
Shrike, I linked you to the definition change that occurred in 2017 you retarded fuck. You ran away after that. Merriam/ Google modified the definition then dumbass.
My God, do you know anythinf?
1. I'm not 'shrike,' stop being so pathetic. Get out of your basement sometime.
2. You linked to the 'politically refined definition?' WTF is that?
3. 'My God, do you know anythinf?' I don't know 'anythinf?' Lol.
1. Yes you are dumbass. Youre not fooling anybody.
2. Redefined. Sound out the words. Autoocorrect is not perfect but you could have figured it out if you were intelligent.
3. Typing on a phone. Sue me.
Now can you address the argument shrike? Doubtful. You've really made yourself look stupid tonight.
1. You're really sad and stupid. You and anyone else can check that I have a long history of commenting on the Volokh side. I'm not 'shrike.' It can't be that you really think only one person thinks your arguments are silly. Get out of your basement sometime, you'll see it's many people.
2. You really shouldn't go 'sound out the words' when you misspelled it.
3. Yeah, another error, I get it.
I can address your 'argument' easily: I already said I'm not referring to the 'redefined' term:
"You don't think a healthy portion of those at the Unite the Right march were fascists *by the definition used for 80 years*?"
You're not very sharp, are you?
Lol. Pure idiocy shrike.
The liberal redefined version of fascism idiots like espouse. Or the actual definition used for 80 years?
You have no doubt reached the height of absurdity by claiming the pro-Trump neo-Nazi Unite the Right mob were actually progressives.
Embrace your Fascism, Jesse! Just like your Unite the Right brethren has.
Are you able to fucking read shrike? I didn't call them progressives retard.
I stated how you switched to using the 2017 redefinition of fascism to make it exclusionary to nationalist right wing figures. And ignore the legacy definition used for 80 years which didn't denote right or left.
Holy fuck you've gotten dumber.
" I didn't call them progressives retard"
That reads like someone from the Beverly Hillbillies wrote it.
Btw-the 'legacy' definition of fascism did denote the right (its counterpart was communism which denoted the left). I think you're trying to say people on the left have greatly expanded the legacy definition to defame lots of people on the right who wouldn't have traditionally been thought of as fascists. You're right about that, you just don't know how to put it.
Damn shrike. You keep fucking up juggling your socks no. Fascism was a form of authoritarian where state utilized regulation over corporations to push their centralized planning and authoritarian rules. It was a different means to control industry.
Just because fascists and communists fought didn't mean they were opposite sides you retarded fuck. Corporatism is a form of soft fascism and is utilized heavily by the left. The Nazi party pushed a leftist platform through a form of fascism. They fought with leftists Stalinists, but had very common goals in their form of control
Again, you have gotten dumber.
No one ever believed that except Jonah Goldberg liars.
In the 1920s, the Italian Fascists described their ideology as right-wing in the political program The Doctrine of Fascism, stating: "We are free to believe that this is the century of authority, a century tending to the 'right,' a fascist century."[49] Mussolini stated that fascism's position on the political spectrum was not a serious issue for fascists: "Fascism, sitting on the right, could also have sat on the mountain of the center. ... These words in any case do not have a fixed and unchanged meaning: they do have a variable subject to location, time and spirit. We don't give a damn about these empty terminologies and we despise those who are terrorized by these words."[50]
Major Italian groups politically on the right, especially rich landowners and big business, feared an uprising by groups on the left, such as sharecroppers and labour unions.[51] They welcomed Fascism and supported its violent suppression of opponents on the left.[52] The accommodation of the political right into the Italian Fascist movement in the early 1920s created internal factions within the movement. The "Fascist left" included Michele Bianchi, Giuseppe Bottai, Angelo Oliviero Olivetti, Sergio Panunzio, and Edmondo Rossoni, who were committed to advancing national syndicalism as a replacement for parliamentary liberalism in order to modernize the economy and advance the interests of workers and the common people.[53] The "Fascist right" included members of the paramilitary Blackshirts and former members of the Italian Nationalist Association (ANI).[53] The Blackshirts wanted to establish Fascism as a complete dictatorship, while the former ANI members, including Alfredo Rocco, sought to institute an authoritarian corporatist state to replace the liberal state in Italy while retaining the existing elites.[53] Upon accommodating the political right, there arose a group of monarchist fascists who sought to use fascism to create an absolute monarchy under King Victor Emmanuel III of Italy
So fascism was right wing in its 1930s Italian origin. When did liberals redefine it?
Right wing Europeans are on the left dumbass. Fascism is agnostic to right vs left. It is a form of authoritarianism. You are really ignorant aren't you.
I love that you and QA continue to define Europeans like their Left/Right is anything like our Left/right.
You would think such stellar intellects would know the difference authoritarian and libertarian governments and that socialism and fascism both exist on one side of the spectrum.
You really are a fool. Left and right are *relative* terms. In the Depression there were a lack of viable pro-capitalist political parties. The Nazis and Italian fascists at times appropriated popular socialist/communist rhetoric but everyone at the time realized they were the 'right' alternative.
But more importantly, you're making my point I made upthread: only a fool would think the fascists deserve endorsement (as Trump did Hungary's leader) because the communists hated them (and 'didn't explain why' lol).
And you used your sock to say the same idiotic shit? Fascism falls on the authoritarian liberty scale, not right left scale you fucking dumbass. Fascist states have occurred on both the right and left side of the spectrums under various regimes.
My God shrike, pick up a book and educate yourself.
So you prefer your old fashioned nazis , like Soros eh?
Will you be honest? I will ask again.
Why don't you embrace your fascist leanings like your fellow alt-right Trump-fans openly did at the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville?
Jesse refuses to reply. ML won't reply.
Will you?
Pluggo, did you ever track down the password to the account that had the same name as an account that posted child pornography in these comments? Or are we back to the account got hacked?
Reply is below, you posturing piece-of-shit.
Here's an additional reply; Fuck you Shrike, you dishonest garbage fifty-center.
Why don't you publicly (you've already done it privately) embrace your fascist leanings like your lord and saviour George Soros? A literal Hitlerjugend who robbed Jewish homes and reported them to the Nazis.
Why don't you also finally admit that you're paid to troll here?
Oh, and when will you stop pretending that your ban wasn't because you posted deep web child porn links here.
Lol. When did I refuse to reply shitnfor brains?
"Why don't you embrace your fascist leanings like your fellow alt-right Trump-tards openly did at the Unite the Right rally in ?
ML, be honest for once. At least the Unite the Right pro-Trump neo-Nazi marchers were."
Where the fuck did this horseshit come from? Who the hell was talking about Charlottesville?
Stop with your bullshit distraction techniques and answer the question of why you think Orbán is Hitler. Aside from getting in the way of your paymaster, George Soros, what has he done bad?
Fascism is a leftist construct. Just like every other form of socialism.
It should be apparent by now, that populists (drawing on popular support from the populace) are a threat to democracy. It's literally hanging by a thread.
Exactly.
Right wing populists who belong to the cult of Trump are just as much a threat to liberal democracy as Bernie Sanders left wing populists.
You are no question the only rational conservative on this board. And if you don't call yourself a conservative then I will stand corrected.
Yes, power from the individual is so much more dangerous than an oligarchy or an elitist centralized government said no libertarian ever.
I would call myself a conservative-leaning libertarian.
Libertarians can be either conservative or liberal.
A lot of Democrats used to be liberal, and preach tolerance.
Increasingly they are becoming illiberal, and preaching intolerance.
There are a few conservatives around here who are not just drooling morons who want nothing more than to 'pwn the libs'. CE is a good duck, so are creech, Squirrel, Overt. But the mean grrlz like Jesse and his squad really stink up the place.
Well, ML, if you are serious about wondering why Orban is bad, here are just a few examples:
1. In this country, if you publish misinformation on social media, about the worst that will happen to you is that you get banned. In Hungary, however, you get sent to prison for 5 years.
2. He completely banned same-sex couple adoptions.
3. He has completely undermined press freedom through a sneaky plan. His government handed out loans to "friendly investors", the investors then bought small media outlets, then those media outlets were "donated" back to the government. In so doing he's put most of the media under direct government control.
4. Oh, and because of coronavirus, he's basically dictator now.
There's more, read it all here.
https://freedomhouse.org/country/hungary/freedom-world/2021
Oh, and because of coronavirus, he's basically dictator now.
But enough about Fauci.
1. Ricky Vaughn wasn't arrested?
2. Pennsylvania didn't try to outlaw religious charities?
3. DoJ didn't just raid project Veritas? Obama didn't use arrest warrants on journalists?
4. Like most leftist governors assuming emergency powers?
2. Should say religious adoption centers.
But Jesse, it’s different! Homos are darlings of the left. Not like those Christian meanies.
This doesn't make him hitler, it makes him corrupt, which is typical for politicians, it makes him biased against homosexuals adopting, and it makes him allegedly attempting to remain in office. Nobody here is arguing that Orban is perfect, but the comparison to hitler, or attempted contrast w/ soros, who is shitty, is dishonest, pathetic, and biased. At some point letting rightist governments defy the EU and not defending those who collaborated with the 3rd Reich will be an argument that the left-leaning commentariat try.
Orban isn't funding or organizing totalitarian activists to attack my freedom and life.
Soros, actual Nazi, is.
He has the moral authority of someone who led his agency through the AIDS crisis
...
So why has Reason (maybe not all of its writers, but I'm lookin' at you Mr. Soave) jumped on the bandwagon to cast him as a comic book supervillain?
Not to defend Robby too vociferously but this is hilariously stupid. There were more AIDS deaths last year than in Fauci's first 10 yrs. as director of the NIAID. He's got the moral authority of someone who's not as bad as Dr. Mengele but not as good as Lysenko. That's why he's the villain, dumbass.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HIV/AIDS_in_the_United_States#/media/File:AIDS_Deaths-US_1987-1997.png
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/03/AIDS_Deaths-US_1998-2002.png
Worldwide about 700,000 died last year, so technically he's right.
Uh, worldwide is not the right metric my horned friend.
He has the moral authority of someone who led his agency through the AIDS crisis
And said that HIV could be spread through casual contact.
Cite?
Shrike, this has been linked to you before dummy.
https://news.yahoo.com/video-resurfaces-fauci-warning-household-180945365.html?guccounter=1
Hmm, it seems here he is quoted as saying "perhaps." Does your screen omit that word? Maybe a glitch?
It’s shows how little he knows.
Uh, when was that from? And the fact that he says 'perhaps' means it's speculation. Were that folks like you would phrase things as carefully!
Science!
Lol. You asked for a cite. He was also the one who influenced schools to ditch water fountains in the early 90s
You have really gotten fucking stupid shrike.
I did ask for a cite for the claim "said that HIV could be spread through casual contact" but you gave me one where early in the crisis he says "perhaps."
Do you not know what the word perhaps means? I could link to a definition...
Please tell us the difference between the word could and the word perhaps.
Lol.
You really are digging a hole here.
This is why I don't bother to give it citations anymore.
I like making shrike look stupid. It is too easy.
Well, that and he doesn't have any.
per·haps
/pərˈ(h)aps/
Learn to pronounce
adverb
adverb: perhaps
used to express uncertainty or possibility.
Good Jesus you're a dumb one, aren't you?
If I say 'perhaps the Eagles will be good this year' and you reply 'he said the Eagles would be good this year' you....are stupid.
Wait, so youre actually arguing the word "could" doesnt imply a possibility?
I mean it is telling you switched the word from could to would in your idiotic example.
Lol. God damn shrike.
Holy shit this was embarrassing.
Fauci, like Herbert Hoover, lives on the fumes of his past performance. He's the highest paid bureaucrat and it seems everyone is afraid to fire him. Maybe he's got a black book on everyone too.
But fauci proved to be wildly incompetent in the past
"What We Got Wrong About 2021"
Oh! Oh! I know! Pick me!
- "I will cast my ballot for Joe Biden in Michigan, a swing state, because there is no bigger libertarian cause right now”
- “Who do I plan to vote for this year? Joe Biden. The nationalists said the libertarian-conservative consensus is dead, and I take them at their word. Also, Stephen Miller is a white nationalist.”
- “I will vote strategically… for Biden.”
- “I will cast my first ever vote for president for Joe Biden in the battleground state of Pennsylvania.”
- “I’ve been vacillating between sitting out this election, as I did in 2016, or voting for Joe Biden. The strongest argument for the latter choice is that it’s an opportunity to support the repudiation of both Trumpism and AOC”
- “I’ll be voting for Joe Biden, primarily for three reasons: (1) A feeble president Biden seems like an opportunity to erode the power and glamour of the dangerous cult of the presidency and also push socialists, nationalists, and identitarians back to the margins, creating space for a more libertarian-friendly coalition to emerge.”
- “If it was going to be close in my state, I might have considered holding my nose and voting for the person (Biden) most likely to supplant the eminently fireable incumbent.”
- "I will vote for Jo Jorgensen—unless I believe there is a chance that Joe Biden will somehow fail to win Virginia, in which case I will vote strategically and reluctantly for Biden."
Not just wrong but also retarded.
Love it
Neither.
“I’ll be voting for Joe Biden, primarily for three reasons: (1) A feeble president Biden seems like an opportunity to erode the power and glamour of the dangerous cult of the presidency and also push socialists, nationalists, and identitarians back to the margins, creating space for a more libertarian-friendly coalition to emerge.”
That sounds suspiciously like exactly what is happening with a feeble Biden practically teeing up a GOP House win in 2022.
5D chess.
Thinking that a feeble Biden wouldn’t just be a puppet for his progressive handlers was one of the dumber things said in that entire article, which is saying a lot.
"Trust the system!"
-creech
Weird how not one them mentions this...
"So why has Reason (maybe not all of its writers, but I'm lookin' at you Mr. Soave) jumped on the bandwagon to cast him as a comic book supervillain?"
They haven't, which is actually a shame actually, because he really is a comic book supervillain.
Oh, come on, it's not like he was torturing puppies or funding illegal bioweapon research or anything . . .
Dr Fauci hasn't even got the laugh down.
https://capnben0.tripod.com/images/comics/tbs_wws3.gif
He's more of a Bond villain, or maybe a henchman.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/66890686@N02/51237482431/in/dateposted-public/
Fauci: 'Individual Rights Are Not As Important As The Needs Of The Borg Collective'
"We must not fall into the old way of thinking, that humans had individual civil liberties. That is why humanity has failed. Humanity is flawed. The individual is flawed. But together, as the great Borg Hivemind, we can transcend humanity and conquer the universe!"
https://babylonbee.com/news/fauci-the-needs-of-the-individual-are-outweighed-by-the-needs-of-the-borg-collective
He doesn't rate supervillain, ML. He is a grey flannel wearing middle man, a henchman, the accountant to the supervillaiin, who has been promoted beyond his potential.
Reason editors supporting Biden was a big wrong.
You're right. They should have refused to vote for either Biden or Trump.
Wait, they mostly did...
You really are a dumb one. Writing articles calling Biden moderate despite his own campaign website was done to hide the extremism in his and the DNCs planks. It was a defense of Biden.
once again
Why don't you embrace your fascist leanings like your fellow alt-right Trump-tards openly did at the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville?
Reply please.
You will never get a straight answer from Jesse. He will just respond with whataboutisms, insults, and strawmen.
For the record I don't think Jesse is a fascist, but I don't think he would mind too much if there was more right-wing fascism in this country.
Lol. Shrike makes up a strawman and you demand something from me? Go eat a donut jeff.
Wtf kind of straight answer does that question deserve?
Hey Jeffy, when are you going to stop beating your wife?
You fatfuck pedo loving little shitweasel. You’re the last one to talk.
You won’t get an answer because the only fascists here are fucktards like Shrike “Obamacare is a market solution because they built a website for you to compare prices”.
He doesn’t deserve an answer and frankly, if you think anybody the regular posters here are fascists, you don’t either.
Oh please, if unite the right is a threat to democracy, democracy deserves no respect.
What are you blathering about pedo? I've never defended Charlottesville dummy. God damn you are flailing badly tonight.
El oh El
I'm curious as to why this is 'lol.' Is it something like 'lol those libs seek help for their problems!'?
Libs have more problems than normal people.
I guess that's why liberal West Virginia has the way highest opioid addiction rate? This is silly reasoning.
Drug addiction =/= depression.
You’re such a desperate piece of shit.
You misspelt despicable.
And left out obtuse, ignorant, and stupid.
So why has Reason (maybe not all of its writers, but I'm lookin' at you Mr. Soave) jumped on the bandwagon to cast him as a comic book supervillain?
Umm, because he acts like a Supervillain and all the people with power listen to him as THE Scienctismist.
Cool story, bro.
Yeah, it is bitch. Good of you to notice.
Written 11 months ago and still very much on point.
https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/arts-letters/articles/david-samuels-new-americans-gamestop-wallstreetbets
"really all he can do is make suggestions"
All Vito Genovese could do was "make suggestions". All the Pope can do is "make suggestions". All Jim Jones could do was "make suggestions". Are you really so naïve that only someone with explicit statutory authority has the power to coerce or intimidate people into obedience?
It's such an asinine question because Biden isn't even running the show, his handlers and advisers are. Well guess who makes that list: Anthony Fauci.
What we got right: both sides bad.
What we got wrong: both sides equally bad.
They're both bad enough. Who cares if they are "equally bad" or not? Neither one is worthy of my vote. We all should have more self-respect than to settle for the bottom-feeding vermin that inhabit both Team Red and Team Blue.
It's cute that you think that politics is supposed to be some noble pursuit. It's a blood-sport; play to win, or you're losing.
He’s a democrat shill. Despite all his protestations to the contrary.
O/T - What the hell was Antonio Brown thinking?
Maybe he's got a WWE or AEW contract lined up? The next 'Loose Cannon!'
Also, I really want to point a finger at sports journalism. This is such a juicy story, and yet we know so little. What was going on on that bench? Maybe the Bucs personnel are just doing a fantastic job of keeping it all close to the vest, but you'd think we'd have more answers...
He was mad at Tom Brady for going to Gronk more in the 2nd and 3rd quarters. In the 3rd quarter, BA then told AB to go back in the game but AB said he was playing hurt and didn’t go in. They tole him they wanted him back in to help win the game and to help him get his bonus incentives. He then walked out on his team. AB being AB.
Maybe that that lady gymnast quit and was turned into a national hero? Maybe that will happen to me if I do it.
I think when he finally dies we’ll find that he has really bad CTE.
Or that he was a dozen ferrets in a Fauci suit.
He's also probably just an asshole
I really like this podcast. This is a podcast krunkerio that everyone should listen to over and over again.
"But why has [Fauci] become the target of choice for vilification, when really all he can do is make suggestions?"
Because he currently has great influence over the people who have power. He is the most vocal of the highly risk averse cadre of medical professionals. He has lied to influence the actions of the populace in the direction he desires. He has reveled in his notoriety. He has essentially declared the pronouncements of government scientists as an unquestionable dogma and himself the pope of the cult of "The Science".
Lastly, when faced with a ban on gain of function research in the USA, he subcontracted out continuation of such research to the substandard Chinese labs that are the likely source of the COVID 19 outbreak.
our roomate's mom makes $72 an hour at home, she has been unemployed for two months and last month her check was $21204 just working at home two hours per day... go to this link >>> http://www.now37.com
If Anthony Fauci has no power then why does the Federal Government keep creating policies that he tells them to? The man appears on national television with more regularity than any current athlete or celebrity and he lays out what Federal government is going to do to crush people it doesn't like.
Why would that bother anyone? Your guess is as good as mine I suppose.
The new Matrix movie was fucking horrible and you should all feel bad for endorsing it.
And ya know what, it even avoided the wokeness that ruins most new movies these days and still managed to suck yuge balls.
Because he currently has great influence over the people who have power. He is the most vocal of the highly risk averse cadre of medical professionals. He has lied to influence the actions of the populace in the direction he desires. He has reveled in his notoriety. He has essentially declared the pronouncements of government scientists as an unquestionable dogma and himself the pope of the cult of "The Science".
Because he currently has great influence over the people who have power. He is the most vocal of the highly risk averse cadre of medical professionals. He has lied to influence the actions of the populace in the direction he desires. He has reveled in his notoriety. He has essentially declared the pronouncements of government scientists as an unquestionable dogma and himself the pope of the cult of "The Science".
https://web-alarab.com/