Does Bitcoin Have the Potential to Become a Generally Accepted Medium of Exchange?
Financial consultant John Vallis vs. George Mason University economist Lawrence H. White

U.S. national debt held by the public is at almost $22 trillion, or about $67,000 per citizen, surpassing the country's annual Gross Domestic Product for the first time since World War Two. The Congressional Budget Office predicts that it'll reach 102 percent of GDP by the end of 2021, to 107 percent by 2031, and hit 202 percent by 2051.
The federal government's "growing debt burden would increase the risk of a fiscal crisis and higher inflation as well as undermine confidence in the US dollar," the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) concluded in its March 2021 Long-Term Budget Outlook.
If the world were to lose confidence in the dollar, what could replace it— another fiat currency, gold, or bitcoin? That was the topic of a recent Oxford-style debate hosted by the Soho Forum.
John Vallis, a financial consultant and host of the Bitcoin Rapid-Fire podcast, believes that bitcoin will eventually replace governments' fiat money as the preferred medium of exchange. He argues that bitcoin's global adoption is a matter of when not if.
Lawrence H. White, an economics professor at George Mason University, is skeptical of bitcoin's future as money. He believes it may have a future as a financial asset, but isn't suitable to become a global medium of exchange.
The debate was moderated by Soho Forum Director Gene Epstein and held before a live audience at the Porcupine Freedom Festival—better known as PorcFest—in Lancaster, New Hampshire.
Narrated by Nick Gillespie, audio production by John Osterhoudt
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Porcupine Freedom Festival. What is the difference between porcupines and the White House? Porcupines have the pricks on the outside.
I'm guessing a certain billionaire is long on bitcoin given all the pumping going on.
Same here.
Exit strategy
We obviously need something like Trump-Coin. It is worth whatever Trump says it is and backed by Trump Taj Mahal casino chips and the Ruble.
What about what Reagan did?
I’m holding out for the Creepy Joe coin. Possessors would be biden their time until it was worthless.
Their method of production is being pulled from behind little girls' ears.
One thing you can be sure of on any commenting around bitcoin: There will be endless throngs of people asserting the definitions of "money" and "currency" as if these definitions weren't regularly argued by actual economists all the time. And they will declare bitcoin either "doomed" or "the future" based on some economic theory that they will assert as if there were never any argument about that economic theory what so ever.
Folks are chomping at the bit, coining new theories to model and forecast crypto.
Not crypto generally, but for bitcoin I think the rational market prediction is bitcoin goes to zero.
The catch is that the market can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent.
So which bin, "doomed" or "the future" does, "He believes it may have a future as a financial asset, but isn't suitable to become a global medium of exchange." go into in your transcendentally enlightened view of the topic?
No.
"If the world were to lose confidence in the dollar, what could replace it— another fiat currency, gold, or bitcoin?"
If by "fiat currency" you mean "has no intrinsic value and isn't backed by anything" then bitcoin IS fiat currency.
I could potentially see bitcoin for international transfers, but not as a functional currency for daily life.
Pretty simple, isn't it?
"what would it look like if a currency was taking over?"
It would look like people using that currency to buy things.
“If the world were to lose confidence in the dollar, what could replace it— another fiat currency, gold, or bitcoin?”
There’s the old standby answer of canned goods and ammo.
A financial device that can gain or lose $30,000 per unit in a six month period as a "standard unit" of exchange?
Ah ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha heee
Nothing says fiat-induced-bubble-resistant currency like tanking 15% in 24 hrs. when China cracks down on bitcoin miners.
At least until the first power outage.
i really hope soon it will be accepted as the general payment
Thanks for sharing!
In fact, the news is very good. Recently, trading news has not pleased me, unfortunately, and the situation on the markets is generally unstable, even more than usual, but the popularization of bitcoin is really great. I just close myself off from all this on https://www.ironfx.com/en/trading/spreads and I study useful information, because reading this all makes me depressed.
Process Development Service
https://www.profacgen.com/process-development-service.htm Profacgen is capable of providing process development service for our customers.