Hail Satan? A New Documentary Shows Devil Worshipers Are Unlikely Defenders of the First Amendment
Director Penny Lane chronicles the rise of the Satanic Temple, a group that combines theatrical stunts with political activism.

"The Satanic Temple is a new religious organization that was founded in 2013, kind of as a prank, but very quickly gained a huge amount of authentic followers," says Penny Lane, director of Hail Satan?, a documentary premiering at select theaters this week.
Headquartered in Salem, Massachusetts, the Satanic Temple began by organizing theatrical stunts designed to shock people. As its membership grew, political activism became central to the Temple's mission. It challenged Christian monuments on public land and opposed the teaching of religion in public schools, making enemies of politicians, television pundits, and pastors across the country.
So what do followers of the Satanic Temple believe? "You do find a range of political views within this religious organization," Lane says. "But when your religious tenets are about rebellion against authority, checking your beliefs against our best evidence…autonomy, freedom, liberty—yeah, you certainly see a large overlap with a libertarian point of view."
In this interview, Lane talks about what makes the Satanic Temple tick and what its struggles with Christians, politicians, and the mainstream media say about religion in America today.
Subscribe, rate, and review our podcast at iTunes.
Produced, hosted, and edited by Todd Krainin.
Music credit: 'Unusual Habitat' by Silent Partner
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Wow, it's like Satanic deja vu.
If you think Christopher Hitchens' version of militant atheism was too mushy and wimpy, and insufficiently edgy, then the Satanic Temple may be for you!
Bonus link #1: The Satanic Temple disses the Church of Satan:
https://thesatanictemple.com/pages/what-is-the-difference-between-the-satanic-temple-and-the-church-of-satan
Bonus link #2:The Church of Satan denounces the Satanic Temple - splitters!
https://www.churchofsatan.com/the-satanic-temple-fact-sheet/
All of their people are white on the right side!
And what ever happened to the Popular Front, anyway?
The Satanic Temple - Defending the 1A when the ACLU won't.
"unlikely defenders of the 1st amendment"? I would think they'd be at the front of the 1st amendment line.
Maybe right behind Larry Flynt.
membership comes w/time travel to last week.
LOL
So some town in podunk midwest passes a law to allow private groups to put up monuments on a space in public parks, and some locals put up a cross to memorialize veterans. Then satanists in San Fran or New York hear about it, jet in, and demand to put up their satanic monument in the podunk town none of them live in.
How is that a defense of 1A?
Seems more like an attack to me.
Devil Worshipers Are Unlikely Defenders of the First Amendment.
That just goes to show you these devil worshipers are really progressives.
"Walpurgisnacht worshippers"
They're rather like the communists in that regard: Stridently in favor of freedom as long as they expect somebody else to have the whip in hand, but let THEM get a taste of power, and it would be different.
Insisting on your own right to your speech and religion doesn't make you a "defender of the First Amendment". It's when you defend other people's rights to free speech and freedom of religion, people you disagree with, that you become a "defender of the First Amendment".
I would categorize the Satanists as neither libertarian in nature, nor as 1A defenders.
They're primarily anti-Christian trolls. They talk some smack about "Cause no harm, Do as thou wilt" but their commitment to freedom seems only as deep as rebelling against an established religious authority and sexual freedom.
Beyond that, they seem to be as authoritarian as any other progressive on subjects like guns, hate speech, etc.
This is one of the worst episodes of the podcast that I've ever heard.