Forced to Unionize: Is this Cesar Chavez's Legacy?
"If Cesar were here today, he certainly wouldn't be supporting what's being done now, which is a union trying to impose itself on employees," says Dan Gerawan, co-owner of Gerawan Farms, one of the nation's largest producers of peaches, plums, and nectarines and a major employer of California farm workers.
Gerawan Farms and some of its employees are in the midst of a fight with the United Farm Workers (UFW) union, which claims to represent Gerawan's workers, despite not having collected dues or bargained on behalf of them for more than two decades.
After years of failed efforts to unionize California's migrant farm workers, a massive grape strike started in the small farming town of Delano sparked a movement leading to the eventual rise of the UFW in 1966. The face of this movement was a man named Cesar Chavez, a man revered by labor historians as the bringer of "peace in the fields," who has roads, schools, and even holidays named after him. He's also the subject of an upcoming biopic starring Michael Peña.
But since then, much has changed in the agriculture industry and in labor politics. The UFW, which once boasted more than 50,000 dues-paying members, now claims fewer than 5,000. Yet with unionization in the industry on the decline, real wages have steadily increased. This might explain why many workers at Gerawan Farms have begun to protest—not against their employer, but against the union.
Gerawan Farms employs more than 10,000 workers a year—more than double the entire membership of UFW—and points to county employment statistics to back up claims that it's an industry leader in employee compensation. UFW won an election to represent Gerawan Farms' workers in 1990. The company and the union had a single bargaining session, and then UFW disappeared from the scene, according to Dan Gerawan.
UFW refused to participate in the story and has not answered questions about why they disappeared for more than two decades. The truth is, they don't have to answer such questions. Despite its 24-year absence, UFW is still the representative union of the workers under California law. Two years ago, UFW initiated a process called "mandatory mediation and conciliation," which would force Gerawan Farms to impose a union contract and terminate any employees not willing to divert three percent of wages towards union dues. This did not sit well with the workers.
Silvia Lopez has worked in Gerawan Farms' fields for 14 years and raised her two daughters on her salary from the job. She once worked in a union shop and didn't enjoy the experience, saying it was like "having two bosses."
"I never liked a company where they have [a] union," says Lopez. "I don't see that I have to pay somebody to explain me my rights. I know my rights."
Silvia started a petition to hold an election to officially decertify UFW. She collected more than 2,000 employee signatures and submitted them to California's Agricultural Labor Relations Board (ALRB). Silas Shawver, ALRB General Counsel, rejected the petition.
"There were some serious problems with signatures submitted that appeared to be fraudulent," says Shawver.
Lopez denies that there were a significant number of fake signatures on the petition, but she nonetheless tried again, collecting thousands of signatures for a second time. Shawver rejected the petition again, citing allegations made by UFW that Gerawan management was putting pressure on the employees to oppose the union. ALRB, which acts as investigator, prosecutor, and judge in these cases, is pursuing unfair labor practice charges against Gerawan Farms in court in conjunction with UFW.
The appearance of collusion between the ALRB and the UFW disturbed Gerawan management and infuriated many of the workers, who staged a protest in front of the ALRB offices in Visalia. In a move reminiscent of the famous Delano grape strike, some even travelled to Sacramento hoping to have their voices heard by Governor Jerry Brown, the very same governor who created the ALRB while in office 38 years ago to create "peace in the fields" and act as a neutral arbiter between companies, workers, and unions.
"Often what our employees tell us is, they don't trust the ALRB," says Gerawan. "They've cited Silas Shawver himself as someone they don't trust."
Following the protests, the ALRB finally granted the workers their election, to be overseen by ALRB and administered by Shawver. Prior to the elections, Gerawan Farms granted ALRB access to their facilities to conduct interviews and run private sessions to inform workers of their voting and unionization rights.
What were the election results? We don't know. Shawver has impounded the votes in an office safe, pending further investigation of the unfair labor practice allegations. He failed to provide a timeline for this investigation.
"What does that mean, to have an election and not count the votes?" asks Lopez. "Where is the right of the farm worker? Where is it?"
Lopez and her co-workers have filed a class-action lawsuit against the ALRB for failing to count their ballots. Gerawan Farms is also suing, alleging that mandatory mediation is unconstitutional. UFW continues to call for a contract to be imposed and, alongside ALRB, alleges that Gerawan has engaged in unfair labor practices.
"The main problem is in the ALRB office," says Lopez. "They are supposed to be neutral with us. But they are not. We can see that they are favoring the UFW organization."
Watch the above video for an inside look at this fight, and scroll down for downloadable versions. Produced by Zach Weissmueller. Camera by Sharif Matar and Weissmueller. Approximately 8 minutes.
Scroll down for downloadable versions of this video, and subscribe to Reason TV's YouTube Channel for notifications when new material goes live.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
#TrollFreeThursday
Too late; they already posted a Chapman article.
I'm offended by your abuse of the pound sign.
As well as trying to impose your will upon the commentariat with everything that follows.
Management is trying to move the farm to Albuquerque, New Mexico?
What were the election results? We don't know. Shawver has impounded the votes in an office safe, pending further investigation of the unfair labor practice allegations. He failed to provide a timeline for this investigation.
This sounds like the prologue of an episode of Burn Notice.
They say art imitates life, after all.
Yes.
Next question?
I'm no history expert, but didn't the Venezuelan people actually vote for Chavez and for the socialism he promised?
And now they're surprised?
And now they're surprised?
Know who else voted for a leader and got surprised by the outcome?
Every voter ever?
Untrue, I've never been surprised. Especially when the winner list is the exact inverse of my ballot.
Come on now, I really doubt Russian's believed they'd get anyone but Putin.
The Senate and People of Rome?
Wrong Chavez
Ooops, paint me embarrassed.
a. Told you I was no expert
b. Perhaps I should actually read the article before jumping to conclusions.
My apologies.
*crawls away and hides under rock*
We'll let it slide this once...
Once!
I thought you were deliberately joking. Next time, play it off like that.
I thought so too.
Yes, but for all intents and purposes a distinction without a difference.
Re: Francisco d'Aconia,
That's his ideological brother, Hugo.
I thought it was Harpo...you know the 3 Marx(ist) brothers
Cesar, Hugo and Harpo Chavez. Right? Harpo was the one who played his machete like a saw...pretty awesome.
I know nothing about Cesar but given the amount of fawning he gets from leftists I can only assume he was some sort of monster.
Government mandated workers protections (OSHA, affirmitive action and anti-discriminations rules, federal minimum wages) have essentially made unions obsolete. All of the truly harrowing practices that unions were originally created to combat are now illegal even without a union, so all unions have left to do is to parasitically feed off productive corporations and the public sector.
...feed off...you mean like they suck?
Alas, if only someone made a vacuum that could suck so well...
There is an excellent article that Murray Rothbard wrote about Cesar Chavez (and you don't have to be an ancap to appreciate it). Here's the link: http://mises.org/econsense/ch38.asp
It would be well worth the time since Chavez is a Messiah for many.
Good article. What also isn't mentioned is the driving higher of farm wages is bringing in automation to areas including grape harvesting.
Watching the video, the moment Silas Shawver was asked about the time schedule for the hearings and the release of the vote, you could tell that mendacious ass was lying. If anyone deserves to be unemployed, it is him.
yes, i should consider the opinion of the head of an agricultural company and a tea partier as to the value of unionization. quick question: when is it going to become not interesting to you conservatives that there are actually people out there that vote and advocate against their economic intetests. 5000 UAW members have had their wages increased by collective bargaining, but whoa, wait a sec, tea party jackoff says she thinks cesar chavez hearts joe stalin. who fucking cares what this shrill, ideologically committed right-winger thinks
Hey shithead, maybe the workers are smarter than you, and they don't want to see their money buying hookers and blow for the mob and the apparatchiki.
It must really suck to be you. How are you coping with the socialist disaster in Venuezuela? Got your bullshit lined up to deny that one, too?
-jcr
nice try moron.
Did you not read the article, or did you purposely ignore the statement that the union has been largely absent for twenty years?
"5000 UAW members have had their wages increased by collective bargaining"
There were as many as 50 thousand members at one point. I guess people just don't like paying union dues. I don't recall a single major strike in which the labor side won anything other than a minor concession from the front office.
Collective bargaining scares the living crap out of businesses, and hasten their demise. That's why your jobs go to China.
What present day liberals fail to recognize is that they are looking to reimpose feudalism. What else could they be doing? Liberals like Smith, Cobden and Bright fought against exactly this.
So, when union only has 5,000 serfs paying dues to their capos, how do they have enough money to buy hookers and blow for apparatchiki like this Shawver douchebag?
-jcr