Free Speech Fight: Campus Anti-Zionism May Result in Hate Speech Ban
No part of American society is supposed to value free speech more than our colleges and universities, but the University of California is now rethinking that idea.
University of California President Mark Yudof assembled a team earlier this summer to assess "campus climate" in response to a series of Anti-Zionist protests and demonstrations.
Yudof's fact-finding team made a series of recommendations after visiting campuses, including banning hate speech.
"When you ban speech, it has a funny habit of boomeranging back at you," says Will Creeley, Director of Legal and Public Advocacy for the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education. "Instead of pulling these often noxious or repellant ideas out from behind closed doors and debating them in open sunlight, you see these kind of fears silenced. And that kind of silencing builds a kind of repression, hate, fear, paranoia."
The prospect of a ban on free speech has students up in arms, including members of the Jewish community.
"Jewish students, Muslim students, students of all creeds, faiths, colors, national origins, religions, sexualities can be trusted to defend their own point of view, to speak and enunciate their ideas clearly enough, to have good ideas triumph over ill-founded ones," Creeley says.
President Yudof has said that he is currently reviewing the recommendations, but understands the first amendment concerns. However, he is still considering the report.
About 3 minutes.
Produced by Tracy Oppenheimer. Shot by Josh Swain and Zach Weissmueller.
Music by Case Newsom.
Go to http://reason.com/reasontv for downloadable versions and subscribe to ReasonTV's YouTube Channel to receive notifications when new material goes live.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I am not even sure that the signs displayed in the video still could qualify as hate speech were that a concept worthy of consideration. You could make an argument that they are factually incorrect, but bigoted?
all these students who flame Israel should be required to trade places with Palestinians for a while. Along the way, they will find that the Arabs with the greatest freedom, the Arab women who are the best treated, the Arab gays who are the least harassed are the ones living in Israel.
The Jewish state may do a lot of things wrong but these hyperbolic comparisons found on campuses do little to engender confidence in the product spat forth by higher ed.
"Along the way, they will find that the Arabs with the greatest freedom, the Arab women who are the best treated, the Arab gays who are the least harassed are the ones living in Israel."
If these people gave a damn about things like rights or equality, otherwise they wouldn't be supporting groups like the Hamas in the first place.
These kids just want to designate the Palestinians as perpetual victims who have never done anything remotely wrong that couldn't immediately be scapegoated in Israel or the US. These are the same people who will whinge about an imaginary "War on Women" and then turn around and make every effort ro obfuscate the goings-on in places like Iran.
I didn't watch the video, so maybe I'm missing something, but since when is calling Israel out for its human rights violations equivalent to supporting Hamas? I can't say I really like either the Israeli government or Hamas...
This. College leftists look for any 'victims' to yell and scream about. History and facts do not matter..
Yeah, the Arabs living in Israel have it great, relatively speaking. Not the ones living in the West Bank or Gaza. Not the Beduins(sp?). I don't think anyone wants to change places with them. Maybe a North Korean would.
these hyperbolic comparisons found on campuses do little to engender confidence in the product spat forth by higher ed.
But remember, college students are basically idiots who are stuffed full of learnin' that they only half-comprehend, especially in the social sciences.
Let the stupid little shits say what they want and wave signs all they want. When they get violent, throw the book at them. The last part is what seems to be missing. There are more than enough laws and campus rules to address this problem. Just need to have the will to enforce the laws on the books.
There is only one group among us who is considered more equal and deserving of preferential treatment; only one group that we are willing to suspend the Constitution to placate.....and Jews ain't it.
How does interrupting a speech relate to the first amendment? How does shouting and rioting in the streets relate to the first amendment?
How do illegal banners aka graffitis relate to the first amendment?
Amongst Alex's clutter, there is indeed a valid question: does organized disruption of campus-sponsored speeches and lectures fall under "free speech"? Should one group use its free speech rights to prevent opposing viewpoints from being heard? And if so, should then all groups then adopt the same tactic so that, effectively, no views may be presented?
The rest of the "hate speech" crap is crap. March with your signs showing Israeli flags with swastikas and hook-nosed doctors harvesting organs from Palestinian widows. Who cares, you're an idiot.
This is a good point. I would argue that an organization has the right to maintain open dialogue on its own property, if it chooses.
"No part of American society is supposed to value free speech more than our colleges and universities ..." Well perhaps in the 60s and 70s, but since then, colleges and universities have led the nation with laws outlawing "offensive" speech.
Here's some interesting questions one might pose to those for having laws outlawing hate crimes/speech:
Should those advocating against free speech, be free to do so?
Should those advocating for free speech, be denied the right to do so?
In the name of tolerance, should we include those who are intolerant?
Should laws regarding discrimination, distinguish between government employees and citizens?
Can black people be racist, and if not why?
A free speech fight resulting in an anti-hate speech ban? How shocking... That's like being surprised that being a minority at the airport results in getting grilled by TSA agents: http://lawblog.legalmatch.com/.....-t-shirts/
Free speech is already banned in America. People are arrested all the time for making threatening remarks toward the President.
People are banned from Internet websites for writing something that is not acceptable by the moderators.
People who believe freedom of speech still exists in America are delusion on the issue.
"No part of American society is supposed to value free speech more than our colleges and universities"
Please.
University administrators are mostly far left. And like a lot of people on the far left their pursuit of utopia can be very heavy handed.
In some regards I can understand, people pay a lot of money to go to college. And college is a place where controversy can disrupt the learning process.
Since it is a State University they cannot water down protection of speech.
If they try, they will be hearing from these guys really quickly:
http://thefire.org/
The Fire has an impressive track record of dragging Universities into court and getting their "speech codes" struck down.