Courts Already Declare Statutes "Void-For-Breadth"—They Just Do So Sub Silentio
At some level, the "void-for-breadth" doctrine already exists, but it needs to be excavated, clarified, and expanded.
Associate Professor, University of Connecticut School of Law
At some level, the "void-for-breadth" doctrine already exists, but it needs to be excavated, clarified, and expanded.
When a criminal law is extremely broad but perfectly clear, in what sense does it violate rule-of-law principles?
Repurposing "fair notice" principles to tackle an important aspect of overcriminalization.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10