The Court rescheduled the case seventeen times and relisted it four times.
The Court is still living in Justice Kennedy's shadow and Justice Jackson questions whether executive actions have as much force as statutes.
What rights do aliens have under Section 1?
According to the Attorney General, the First Circuit's clerk refused to "offer any means of filing" an emergency brief after 5:00 p.m.
Justice Barrett mentioned Ilya Somin, but meant Ilya Shapiro.
Judge Matey explains that umpires indicate what the strike zone will be during warmup pitches that do not count.
"When should circuit judges overturn their own non-originalist precedents? Spoiler alert—the answer is 'always.'"
It always takes a veto-proof majority to claw back the President's powers.
"For now, the only way to advance conservatism is to eliminate liberal institutional asymmetries."
I was in the Court, and I have a different take on the case.
Coney Island Auto Parts, Inc. v. Burton was over in 37 minutes.
The Court installed timers to keep track of how long each Justice speaks for!
The VRA allow Democrats to challenge Republican districts, but does not allow Republicans to challenge Democratic districts.
Puerto Rico does not have a viable path towards statehood, and it is unclear what value Commonwealth status provides to the United States.
A fitting update to the rising tide of antisemitism on the left and the right.
Search and seizure cases are very fact bound. The Court wants to set general standards.
"But the danger that I want to highlight to you tonight is not antisemitism on the left. It is antisemitism on the right."
Governor Abbott's recent appointments to SCOTX did not come from the bench.
A new book provides an inside look to the Florida Special Counsel investigation.
"It is, quite simply, the most thorough, useful, and readable guide to our fundamental law available today.
An intern and a law clerk used generative AI, and the judges didn't catch the hallucinations.
Justice Kagan acknowledged an unspoken truth in standing law: it is easier for blue litigants to have standing than for red litigants.
The Court will likely find standing in Bost to avoid the "nightmare scenario" of cancelling votes after they are cast.
Judges would find the law, rather than mechanically following every word that appears in a published opinion.
In Bost, Paul Clement engaged in negotiations with the Justices about the proper standing rule.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanks
Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks