Josh Blackman is a constitutional law professor at the South Texas College of Law Houston and the President of the Harlan Institute. Follow him @JoshMBlackman.
9/11/2001 in Staten Island, New York
My annual remembrance of September 11, 2011
My annual remembrance of September 11, 2011
There are several elements of the panel's decision that cast doubt on DOJ's case.
It feels like 2010, all over again.
The new executive action will also implicate the spending power, and federalism.
There will be lots of litigation, and some judge, somewhere, will find the mandate unlawful.
He implores Nina Totenberg, "I would like this interview to be about my book."
This case really should be captioned United States v. United States.
"The State of Texas includes all of its officers, employees, and agents, including private parties who would bring suit under S.B. 8."
Summer fellows are eligible to earn $10,000 in salary for their 10 weeks of employment.
It still isn't clear who DOJ would sue. Even if sovereign immunity is waived, there is no statewide injunction available.
Instead of issuing summary order, Court grants cert, and orders oral argument in Ramirez v. Collier for "October or November 2021."
The Court will also provide a live audio feed from the Court.
One year since Justice Ginsburg's passing on the Jewish calendar.
Carter Snead: "Texas responded to this futile cycle by adopting a strategy developed by progressives to root out fraud against the government": citizen suits.
At some point, some abortion provider will try to set up a test case to challenge S.B. 8.
If you want to win before a conservative Supreme Court, you must learn to use the lingo of conservative Justices.
President Biden is wrong: The Supreme Court lacks the “supreme authority to ensure justice could be fairly sought.”
But who would the United States sue?
The ACLU endorses a dictum from Prince v. Massachusetts (1944) that predated modern Free Exercise Clause jurisprudence.
Chief Justice Roberts dissented, and would have "preclude[d] enforcement of S. B. 8 by the respondents." But it isn't clear how the named respondents could enforce the law.
I hope the Justices, and their clerks, exercise even greater discipline to avoid further leaks.
Contributions from Katsas, Maggs, Stras, Ho, Hardy, Ryan, Rao, and Garnett
Twenty-five years ago, the official biographer was paid $600,000. Timothy Flanigan is in no hurry.
This article for the Cato Supreme Court Review—my fourth—considers the legal arguments that California v. Texas declined to reach.
"There are a lot of blurred things there, and there are many considerations. They form a whole. I’ll make a decision."
This shadow docket ruling, combined with Biden v. DHS, may be the most significant administrative law rulings of the Term.
The Biden Administration went 0-2 in 48 hours at the Supreme Court.
A new word, coined from DHS v. Regents and Biden v. Trump
I had read the 183-page opinion that morning, and lectured about it in the afternoon.
From Trump to Biden, from Citizens United to Dobbs, from Roe to Casey.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10