In a SCOTUS first, Justice Kagan refers to "red and blue states" and implied that redistricting was a mark of "loyalty" to Trump.
Both cases attempted to hijack the Fourteenth Amendment to help one political party.
Brown, Milliken, and Judge Brown.
One of the few pieces of new information in the New York Times article raising "concerns" about the SG's Office.
An incomplete list of priceless artwork shared with the Justices.
The Plaintiffs argued the 2021 map was an unconstitutional gerrymander. How could reimposing the 2021 map actually redress their purported injuries?
A guest post from Professor Seth Barrett Tillman.
A challenge for cause or a peremptory strike?
Yet another FedSoc debate or an existential challenge?
The Court's order uses the passive voice, which differs from most orders which use the active voice.
The Court rescheduled the case seventeen times and relisted it four times.
The Court is still living in Justice Kennedy's shadow and Justice Jackson questions whether executive actions have as much force as statutes.
What rights do aliens have under Section 1?
According to the Attorney General, the First Circuit's clerk refused to "offer any means of filing" an emergency brief after 5:00 p.m.
Justice Barrett mentioned Ilya Somin, but meant Ilya Shapiro.
Judge Matey explains that umpires indicate what the strike zone will be during warmup pitches that do not count.
"When should circuit judges overturn their own non-originalist precedents? Spoiler alert—the answer is 'always.'"
It always takes a veto-proof majority to claw back the President's powers.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanks
Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks